Contrasting performance of marine spatial planning for achieving multiple objectives at national and regional scales

被引:0
|
作者
Stephenson, Fabrice [1 ,2 ]
Leathwick, John R. [3 ]
Geange, Shane [4 ]
Moilanen, Atte [5 ,6 ]
Lundquist, Carolyn J. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waikato, Sch Sci, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England
[3] 3 Kairuri Lane,Heathcote Valley, Christchurch 8022, New Zealand
[4] Dept Conservat, POB 10-420, Wellington, New Zealand
[5] Univ Helsinki, Finnish Nat Hist Museum, POB 17,Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 13, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Dept Geosci & Geog, Helsinki, Finland
[7] Univ Auckland, Sch Environm, Auckland, New Zealand
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Biodiversity; Demersal fish; Gradient forest models; Marine protection; Spatial prioritisation; Zonation; PROTECTED AREAS; GRADIENT FORESTS; TRADE-OFFS; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; RESERVE; FISHERIES; PATTERNS; NETWORK; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106978
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Although spatially explicit decision support tools are widely used in marine conservation planning, only a few studies have used multi-objective approaches to explicitly achieve biodiversity conservation and sustainable use objectives. Here, we use spatial analyses of a comprehensive environment-based classification (developed using Gradient Forest modelling) that summarises spatial patterns in demersal fish composition and turnover in the oceans around New Zealand, and a 20-year record of trawl locations (representing spatial use by fishers), to identify options for biodiversity protection that vary in their relative delivery of conservation outcomes and impacts on fishers. We also compare analyses carried out at a national scale with those generated by aggregating independent regional analyses. The top-ranked 20% of sites identified using fish composition data alone would on average protect 33% of the geographic range of each fish species, but would result in a 58% loss of areas currently fished. By contrast, using the trawl locations as a cost layer reduced average fish protection by 23% in relative terms, but loss of fished areas was almost eliminated. Using different weightings to vary the influence of the trawl footprint, a range of intermediate scenarios were identified that delivered greater fish protection than the fully cost-constrained scenario. However, these intermediate scenarios resulted in greater reductions in the area retained for fishers than the biodiversity optimised scenario. Aggregated regional scenarios delivered lower conservation returns and higher impacts on fisheries than comparable single national scenarios, reflecting the constraining of opportunities for biodiversity protection whilst avoiding overlaps with trawling. While stakeholder MPA design processes often occur at regional scales, our analyses demonstrate the value of considering both regional and national analyses to identify optimal reserve configurations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prioritising multiple objectives in marine spatial planning for Aotearoa New Zealand
    Jefferson, Tamlin
    Hillman, Jenny R.
    Lundquist, Carolyn J.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 246
  • [2] Marine spatial planning: achieving and evaluating integration
    Portman, Michelle E.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2011, 68 (10) : 2191 - 2200
  • [3] APPROACH TO DYNAMIC REGIONAL-PLANNING WITH MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES
    ROY, GG
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1976, 8 (03) : 341 - 350
  • [4] Integrating regional conservation priorities for multiple objectives into national policy
    Beger, Maria
    McGowan, Jennifer
    Treml, Eric A.
    Green, Alison L.
    White, Alan T.
    Wolff, Nicholas H.
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Mumby, Peter J.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 6
  • [5] Integrating regional conservation priorities for multiple objectives into national policy
    Maria Beger
    Jennifer McGowan
    Eric A. Treml
    Alison L. Green
    Alan T. White
    Nicholas H. Wolff
    Carissa J. Klein
    Peter J. Mumby
    Hugh P. Possingham
    Nature Communications, 6
  • [6] Uncovering the multiple objectives behind national energy efficiency planning
    Haydt, Gustavo
    Leal, Vitor
    Dias, Luis
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 54 : 230 - 239
  • [7] PLANNING RESOURCE USE ON NATIONAL FORESTS TO ACHIEVE MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES
    SCHULER, A
    MEADOWS, JC
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1975, 3 (04) : 351 - 366
  • [8] Marine spatial planning in areas beyond national jurisdiction
    Wright, Glen
    Gjerde, Kristina M.
    Johnson, David E.
    Finkelstein, Aria
    Ferreira, Maria Adelaide
    Dunn, Daniel C.
    Chaves, Mariamalia Rodriguez
    Grehan, Anthony
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 132
  • [9] Regional marine spatial planning - The data collection and mapping process
    Shucksmith, Rachel
    Gray, Lorraine
    Kelly, Christina
    Tweddle, Jacqueline F.
    MARINE POLICY, 2014, 50 : 1 - 9
  • [10] Privatisation of Urban and Regional Development: Achieving Societal Benefits or Business Objectives? Corporate Spatial Responsibility or Corporate Spatial Strategy?
    Knieling, Joerg
    Othengrafen, Frank
    Preising, Tobias
    RAUMFORSCHUNG UND RAUMORDNUNG-SPATIAL RESEARCH AND PLANNING, 2012, 70 (05): : 451 - 464