Fuzzy best-worst method-based approach for warehouse location selection and a case study in Izmir

被引:3
|
作者
Cergibozan, Cagla [1 ]
Golcuk, Ilker [2 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Decision-making; Supply chain management; Optimization techniques; Fuzzy logic; Warehouse location selection; DECISION-MAKING; MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; FACILITY LOCATION; OR/MS RESEARCH; HUMANITARIAN; PRIORITIZATION; SYSTEM; MODEL; SETS;
D O I
10.1108/K-06-2023-0941
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
PurposeThe study aims to propose a decision-support system to determine the location of a regional disaster logistics warehouse. Emphasizing the importance of disaster logistics, it considers the criteria to be evaluated for warehouse location selection. It is aimed to determine a warehouse location that will serve the disaster victims most efficiently in case of a disaster by making an application for the province of Izmir, where a massive earthquake hit in 2020.Design/methodology/approachThe paper proposes a fuzzy best-worst method to evaluate the alternative locations for the warehouse. The method considers the linguistic evaluations of the decision-makers and provides an advantage in terms of comparison consistency. The alternatives were identified through interviews and discussions with a group of experts in the fields of humanitarian aid and disaster relief operations. The group consists of academics and a vice-governor, who had worked in Izmir. The results of a previously conducted questionnaire were also used in determining these locations.FindingsIt is shown how the method will be applied to this problem, and the most effective location for the disaster logistics warehouse in Izmir has been determined.Originality/valueThis study contributes to disaster preparedness and brings a solution to the organization of the logistics services in Izmir.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Kazemi, Mostafa
    Rezaei, Jafar
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 242 : 612 - 623
  • [2] A goal programming-based fuzzy best-worst method for the viable supplier selection problem: a case study
    Rostami, Omid
    Tavakoli, Mahdieh
    Tajally, AmirReza
    GhanavatiNejad, Mohssen
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 27 (06) : 2827 - 2852
  • [3] Prioritizing Surgical Cancellation Factors Based on a Fuzzy Best-Worst Method: A Case Study
    Momen, S.
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.
    Ghasemkhani, A.
    Shahnejat-Bushehri, S.
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, H.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (13): : 112 - 117
  • [4] A framework of Trapezoidal Fuzzy Best-Worst Method in Location Selection for Surface Water Treatment Plant
    Debnath, Kalyani
    Debnath, Piyali
    Choudhury, Sudipa
    Saha, Apu Kumar
    Majumdar, Abhijit
    POLLUTION, 2024, 10 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [5] A framework of Trapezoidal Fuzzy Best-Worst Method in Location Selection for Surface Water Treatment Plant
    Debnath, Kalyani
    Debnath, Piyali
    Choudhury, Sudipa
    Saha, Apu Kumar
    Majumdar, Abhijit
    POLLUTION, 2023, 9 (02): : 839 - 853
  • [6] A Fuzzy Best-Worst Method Based on the Fuzzy Interval Scale
    Goldani, Nastaran
    Kazemi, Mostafa
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 59 - 73
  • [7] Best-worst method for robot selection
    Ali, Asif
    Rashid, Tabasam
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (01) : 563 - 583
  • [8] An approach based on Fuzzy Best-Worst method for sustainable evaluation of mining industries
    Pezeshkan, Mehdi
    Navid, Hosseini
    GOSPODARKA SUROWCAMI MINERALNYMI-MINERAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2020, 36 (02): : 41 - 69
  • [9] Group decision making in best-worst method when the best and worst are not unique: case study of scholar selection
    Adali, Esra Aytac
    Caglar, Atalay
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2023, 29 (01): : 30 - 44
  • [10] A holistic FMEA approach by fuzzy-based Bayesian network and best-worst method
    Yucesan, Melih
    Gul, Muhammet
    Celik, Erkan
    COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 7 (03) : 1547 - 1564