Needle-free anesthetic polymeric device for dental anesthesia in children: A randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Inacio, Gisele Carvalho [1 ]
Pedrazzi, Vinicius [2 ]
de Freitas, Osvaldo [3 ]
Ferreira Duarte, Maira Peres [3 ]
Bezerra da Silva, Raquel Assed [1 ]
Nelson-Filho, Paulo [1 ]
Garcia de Paula-Silva, Francisco Wanderley [1 ]
de Carvalho, Fabricio Kitazono [1 ]
Lucisano, Marilia Pacifico [1 ]
de Oueiroz, Alexandra Mussolino [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Pediat Dent, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Oral Rehabil, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Sch Pharmaceut Sci Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY | 2023年 / 36卷 / 02期
关键词
FREE BUCCAL ANESTHESIA; AMINO AMIDE SALTS; COMPUTERIZED ANESTHESIA; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; PAIN; AGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate efficacy of an anesthetic mucoadhesive film with a polymeric device (PD) in promoting anesthesia compared to conventional local infiltration (LA) in children. Methods: 50 children aged 6-10 years (both genders) needing similar procedures on homologous teeth on the maxilla were included. The parents and children were asked about perception of dental treatment. The child's heart rate per minute (bpm) and blood pressure were evaluated before and after each anesthetic technique (AT) procedure. Anesthesia efficacy was measured by reporting pain using Wong-Baker Faces Scale. Children's behavior and AT preferences were also evaluated. Paired T-test, chi-square and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical comparisons. Results: Fear of anesthesia was reported by 50% of caregivers and by 66% of children. No difference was observed in systolic (P= 0.282) and diastolic (P= 0.251) blood pressure, comparing both AT. Difference was observed regarding the child's behavior when the PD was used (P= 0.0028). Evaluating the face scale, 74% of the children selected the "no pain" (face 0) (P< 0.0001) for PD, and 26% for LA. PD was preferred by 86% of children. Only 20% of the PD anesthesia needed to be complemented by LA. (Am J Dent 2023;36:69-74). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The polymeric device presented promising results since most children did not report pain and dental procedures could be performed without local infiltration.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Needle-Free Anesthesia and Conventional Anesthesia in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Jaju, Krishna Kanth
    Nasim, Iffat
    Choudhari, Sahil
    Sandeep, Hima
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [2] Comparative evaluation of pain perception with a new needle-free system and dental needle method in children: a randomized clinical trial
    Halenur Altan
    Melek Belevcikli
    Alem Coşgun
    Osman Demir
    BMC Anesthesiology, 21
  • [3] Comparative evaluation of pain perception with a new needle-free system and dental needle method in children: a randomized clinical trial
    Altan, Halenur
    Belevcikli, Melek
    Cosgun, Alem
    Demir, Osman
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] Palatal needle-free anesthesia for upper molars extraction. A randomized clinical trial
    Amorim, Klinger de Souza
    Franz-Montan, Michelle
    Groppo, Francisco Carlos
    Muniz, Bruno Vilela
    Macena de Araujo, Jaiza Samara
    Ferreira Santana, Jose Vanison
    Gercina Carvalho Dantas, Anne Caroline
    de Paula, Eneida
    de Almeida Souza, Liane Maciel
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 48 (08) : 815 - 819
  • [5] Needle-free injection: Dental infiltration anesthesia
    Gao, Qiman
    Noel, Geoffroy
    Khatchadourian, Zovinar Der
    Taqi, Doaa
    Abusamak, Mohammad
    Henley, Anna
    Menassa, Karim
    Velly, Ana
    Emami, Elham
    Mongeau, Luc
    Tamimi, Faleh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2021, 604
  • [6] Efficacy of articaine anesthesia with needle-free/Comfort-in method and conventional needle injection in dental patients with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial
    Nogueira, Amanda Palmeira Arruda
    Ferreira, Meire Coelho
    Maia, Claudia de Castro Rizzi
    Goncalves, Bruna Lais Lins
    Maia Filho, Etevaldo
    Costa, Cyrene Piazera
    Gavini, Giulio
    Grazziotin-Soares, Renata
    Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (03)
  • [7] Efficacy of articaine anesthesia with needle-free/Comfort-in method and conventional needle injection in dental patients with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial
    Amanda Palmeira Arruda Nogueira
    Meire Coelho Ferreira
    Cláudia de Castro Rizzi MAIA
    Bruna Laís Lins Gonçalves
    Etevaldo Maia Filho
    Cyrene Piazera Costa
    Giulio Gavini
    Renata Grazziotin-Soares
    Ceci Nunes Carvalho
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 28
  • [8] Needle-free anesthesia: clinical efficacy of a mucoadhesive patch for atraumatic anesthesia in dental procedures
    Adami, Larisse Eduardo
    de Freitas, Osvaldo
    Tocchini de Figueiredo, Fellipe Augusto
    Ferreira, Maira Peres
    Macedo, Ana Paula
    do Couto, Rene Oliveira
    Pedrazzi, Vinicius
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2021, 35
  • [9] Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Fractional Doses of Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Administered Intradermally by Needle-Free Device in Cuba
    Resik, Sonia
    Tejeda, Alina
    Mas Lago, Pedro
    Diaz, Manuel
    Carmenates, Ania
    Sarmiento, Luis
    Alemani, Nilda
    Galindo, Belkis
    Burton, Anthony
    Friede, Martin
    Landaverde, Mauricio
    Sutter, Roland W.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 201 (09): : 1344 - 1352
  • [10] Needle-Free Jet Lidocaine Administration for Preinjection Anesthesia in Trigger Finger Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Earp, Brandon E.
    Stanbury, Spencer J.
    Mora, Ariana N.
    Blazar, Philip E.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 42 (08): : 618 - 622