共 50 条
Language-of-thought hypothesis: Wrong, but sometimes useful?
被引:0
|作者:
Roskies, Adina L.
[1
]
Allen, Colin
[2
]
机构:
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Philosophy, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Hist & Philosophy Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词:
D O I:
10.1017/S0140525X23001991
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
Quilty-Dunn et al. maintain that language-of-thought hypothesis (LoTH) is the best game in town. We counter that LoTH is merely one source of models - always wrong, sometimes useful. Their reasons for liking LoTH are compatible with the view that LoTH provides a sometimes pragmatically useful level of abstraction over processes and mechanisms that fail to fully live up to LoT requirements.
引用
收藏
页数:75
相关论文