The seismic damage mechanism of Daliang tunnel by fault dislocation during the 2022 Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake based on unidirectional velocity pulse input

被引:35
|
作者
Chen, Pingliang [1 ]
Geng, Ping [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Junbo [1 ]
Gu, Wenqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Key Lab Transportat Tunnel Engn, Minist Educ, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] 111 Second Circled Rd North, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Tunnel; Menyuan earthquake; Seismic damage mechanism; Fault dislocation; Unidirectional velocity pulse; TENSILE FAULTS; RUPTURE LENGTH; DEFORMATION; MAGNITUDE; IMPACT; MOTION; SHEAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107047
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Fault dislocation may cause severe damage to tunnel structures. A representative example is the severe damage of the Daliang Tunnel caused by the dislocation of the Lenglongling Fault in the 2022 Menyuan, Qinghai, China, Ms6.9 earthquake. The relative displacement on both sides of the fault during an earthquake is often assumed to be a quasi-static dislocation load, ignoring the dynamic effect. In this study, the dislocation load was considered as a unidirectional harmonic velocity pulse and the damage mechanism of the Daliang tunnel was studied. First, the back-ground of this earthquake and the damage of Daliang tunnel is introduced. The characteristics of surface displacement in this earthquake are analyzed by finite fault model and Okada dislocation theory model, and the dislocation vector of Daliang tunnel is calculated. On this basis, a fault -tunnel FEM nonlinear dynamic model is established, in which unidirectional velocity pulse is used as input of dislocation displacement to consider the dynamic effect of fault dislocation. The study found that the Daliang tunnel was located in one of the regions with the largest dislocation displacement in this earthquake, and the tunnel structure was damaged as a result. The analysis of FEM model reveals that when a unidirectional velocity pulse is used as the load, the tunnel damage is consistent with reality, and the conventional method using the quasi-static dislocation as the load only reflects the dislocation effect of the fault displacement and ignores the impact effect. When the dislocation displacement is certain, the duration of the unidirectional velocity pulse is an important parameter; the shorter the duration, the greater the amplitude of unidi-rectional velocity pulse, resulting in more serious tunnel damage. The tunnel's failure mechanism near the fault can be divided into dislocation failure and impact failure. The dislocation failure is manifested by non-uniform dislocation displacement along the longitudinal direction of tunnel, which is mainly related to the amount of dislocation. The impact failure is manifested by crushing and invert uplift of the lining in cross-section, and it is related to the pulse duration.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] THE DISASTER MECHANISM OF THE Ms6.9 EARTHQUAKE IN MENYUAN, QINGHAI PROVINCE, 2022
    Niu, Peng-Fei
    Han, Zhu-Jun
    Guo, Peng
    Li, Ke-Chang
    Lü, Li-Xing
    Dizhen Dizhi, 2024, 46 (04): : 761 - 782
  • [2] Fault locking of the Qilian-Haiyuan fault zone before the 2022 Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake and its seismic hazards in the future
    Liu, Lei
    Zhuang, Wenquan
    Ji, Lingyun
    Zhu, Liangyu
    Jiang, Fengyun
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [3] Simulation of strong earthquake characteristics of a scenario earthquake(MS7.5) based on the enlightenment of 2022 MS6.9 earthquake in Menyuan
    Zhiwei Ji
    Zongchao Li
    Mengtan Gao
    Jize Sun
    Xiangyun Guo
    Earthquake Science, 2022, (06) : 485 - 496
  • [4] Simulation of strong earthquake characteristics of a scenario earthquake (MS7.5) based on the enlightenment of 2022 MS6.9 earthquake in Menyuan
    Ji, Zhiwei
    Li, Zongchao
    Gao, Mengtan
    Sun, Jize
    Guo, Xiangyun
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2022, 35 (06) : 485 - 496
  • [5] Resilience assessment of the seismic damage mechanism of the Daliang high-speed railway tunnel in the 2022 Menyuan earthquake (Mw 6.7) in China
    Huang, Shan
    Xin, Chunlei
    Song, Danqing
    Feng, Wenkai
    Liu, Xiaoli
    Wang, Enzhi
    Xu, Tenghui
    Xiong, Xiaohui
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2024, 49
  • [6] Seismic structure and b-value in the focal area of the 8th January 2022 Menyuan, Qinghai MS6.9 earthquake
    Sun, Anhui
    Gao, Yuan
    Zhao, Guofeng
    Ren, Chao
    Liang, Shanshan
    Acta Geophysica Sinica, 2022, 65 (03): : 1175 - 1183
  • [7] THE SURFACE RUPTURE CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON THE GF-7 IMAGES INTERPRETATION AND THE FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE 2022 MENYUAN Ms6.9 EARTHQUAKE
    Wang L.
    Xie H.
    Yuan D.-Y.
    Li Z.-M.
    Xue S.-Y.
    Su R.-H.
    Wen Y.-M.
    Su Q.
    Dizhen Dizhi, 2023, 45 (02): : 401 - 421
  • [8] Coseismic slip distribution of the 2022 Menyuan MS6.9: Bayesian modeling based on joint InSAR, GPS and surface dislocation observations
    Lu Zhen
    Wang LiFeng
    Huang WeiLiang
    Liu ChuanJin
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2024, 67 (05): : 1781 - 1796
  • [9] Synthetic aperture radar interferometry—based coseismic deformation and slip distribution of the 2022 Menyuan MS6.9 earthquake in Qinghai, China
    Qiang Zhao
    Fengyun Jiang
    Liangyu Zhu
    Jing Xu
    Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2023, (06) : 541 - 550
  • [10] Quantification of rupture directivity effects on strong ground motion during the 8 January 2022 MS6.9 Menyuan earthquake in Qinghai, China
    Xie, Junju
    Wang, Wencai
    An, Zhao
    Li, Kewei
    Tian, Xiufeng
    Wu, Lina
    Gao, Shude
    Zhang, Weidong
    Yuan, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 10