Adjusting 1.5 degree C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information

被引:7
|
作者
Gambhir, Ajay [1 ]
Mittal, Shivika [1 ]
Lamboll, Robin D. [2 ]
Grant, Neil [1 ,3 ]
Bernie, Dan [4 ,5 ]
Gohar, Laila [4 ]
Hawkes, Adam [6 ]
Koeberle, Alexandre [1 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Rogelj, Joeri [1 ,2 ,10 ]
Lowe, Jason A. [4 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Grantham Inst, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, London, England
[3] Climate Analyt, Berlin, Germany
[4] Met Off Hadley Ctr, Exeter, England
[5] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Bristol, England
[6] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, London, England
[7] Imperial Coll Business Sch, Ctr Climate Finance & Investment, London, England
[8] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany
[9] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, Inst Dom Luiz, Lisbon, Portugal
[10] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Energy Climate & Environm Program, Laxenburg, Austria
[11] Univ Leeds, Priestley Ctr, Leeds, England
关键词
EMISSIONS; TECHNOLOGIES; REDUCTION; FUTURE; GASES; COSTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-023-40673-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Understanding how 1.5 degrees C pathways could adjust in light of new adverse information, such as a reduced 1.5 degrees C carbon budget, or slower-than-expected low-carbon technology deployment, is critical for planning resilient pathways. We use an integrated assessment model to explore potential pathway adjustments starting in 2025 and 2030, following the arrival of new information. The 1.5 degrees C target remains achievable in the model, in light of some adverse information, provided a broad portfolio of technologies and measures is still available. If multiple pieces of adverse information arrive simultaneously, average annual emissions reductions near 3 GtCO(2)/yr for the first five years following the pathway adjustment, compared to 2 GtCO(2)/yr in 2020 when the Covid-19 pandemic began. Moreover, in these scenarios of multiple simultaneous adverse information, by 2050 mitigation costs are 4-5 times as high as a no adverse information scenario, highlighting the criticality of developing a wide range of mitigation options, including energy demand reduction options.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adjusting 1.5 degree C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information
    Ajay Gambhir
    Shivika Mittal
    Robin D. Lamboll
    Neil Grant
    Dan Bernie
    Laila Gohar
    Adam Hawkes
    Alexandre Köberle
    Joeri Rogelj
    Jason A. Lowe
    Nature Communications, 14
  • [2] Adjusting Mitigation Pathways to Stabilize Climate at 1.5°C and 2.0°C Rise in Global Temperatures to Year 2300
    Goodwin, Philip
    Brown, Sally
    Haigh, Ivan David
    Nicholls, Robert James
    Matter, Juerg M.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2018, 6 (03) : 601 - 615
  • [3] On the political feasibility of climate change mitigation pathways: Is it too late to keep warming below 1.5°C?
    Jewell, Jessica
    Cherp, Aleh
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [4] 1.5°C degrowth scenarios suggest the need for new mitigation pathways
    Keysser, Lorenz T.
    Lenzen, Manfred
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [5] 1.5 °C degrowth scenarios suggest the need for new mitigation pathways
    Lorenz T. Keyßer
    Manfred Lenzen
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [6] Underwriting 1.5°C: competitive approaches to financing accelerated climate change mitigation
    Bodnar, Paul
    Ott, Caroline
    Edwards, Rupert
    Hoch, Stephan
    McGlynn, Emily F.
    Wagner, Gernot
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (03) : 368 - 382
  • [7] Inclusive climate change mitigation and food security policy under 1.5 °C climate goal
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Rogelj, Joeri
    Su, Xuanming
    Havlik, Petr
    Krey, Volker
    Takahashi, Kiyoshi
    Riahi, Keywan
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [8] Adjusting agricultural emissions for trade matters for climate change mitigation
    Foong, Adrian
    Pradhan, Prajal
    Froer, Oliver
    Kropp, Juergen P.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [9] Adjusting agricultural emissions for trade matters for climate change mitigation
    Adrian Foong
    Prajal Pradhan
    Oliver Frör
    Jürgen P. Kropp
    Nature Communications, 13
  • [10] Climate Change Mitigation Pathways for the Aviation Sector
    Hasan, Md Arif
    Al Mamun, Abdullah
    Rahman, Syed Masiur
    Malik, Karim
    Al Amran, Md. Iqram Uddin
    Khondaker, Abu Nasser
    Reshi, Omer
    Tiwari, Surya Prakash
    Alismail, Fahad Saleh
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (07)