Information and optimal trading strategies with dark pools
被引:1
|
作者:
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Bayona, Anna
[1
]
Dumitrescu, Ariadna
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Ramon Llull, ESADE Business School, Ave Pedralbes 60-62, Barcelona 08034, SpainUniv Ramon Llull, ESADE Business School, Ave Pedralbes 60-62, Barcelona 08034, Spain
Dumitrescu, Ariadna
[1
]
Manzano, Carolina
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Rovira i Virgili, Ave Univ 1, Reus 43204, Spain
CREIP, Ave Univ 1, Reus 43204, SpainUniv Ramon Llull, ESADE Business School, Ave Pedralbes 60-62, Barcelona 08034, Spain
Manzano, Carolina
[2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Ramon Llull, ESADE Business School, Ave Pedralbes 60-62, Barcelona 08034, Spain
Dark liquidity;
Limit order book;
Adverse selection;
Market performance;
LIMIT ORDER BOOK;
SUBMISSION STRATEGIES;
DEALER MARKETS;
LIQUIDITY;
COMPETITION;
PRICE;
FRAGMENTATION;
CONSOLIDATION;
TRANSPARENCY;
MODEL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106376
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
This paper examines the effects of the competition between asset trading venues with different levels of transparency: an opaque dark pool alongside a transparent exchange organized as a limit order book (two-venue market). In a model with asymmetric information, we compare traders' strategies and market performance in the two-venue market with that of a single-venue market (trading only in the exchange). We show that price informativeness is lower in the two-venue market when informed traders migrate to the dark pool and uninformed investors remain in the exchange. We also find that when orders migrate to the dark pool in the first period, market liquidity is lower (higher) in the two-venue market for high (low) fundamental volatility stocks as traders migrating to the dark pool would have demanded (supplied) liquidity in the exchange. Finally, the expected profits of informed traders are never lower in the two-venue market, but this may not always be true for uninformed traders.