Different cognitive mechanisms used for solving open and closed math problems

被引:1
|
作者
Cui, Jiaxin [1 ]
Wang, Shumin [1 ]
Lv, Liting [1 ]
Ran, Xiaomeng [1 ]
Cui, Zhanling [1 ]
Zhou, Xinlin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Normal Univ, Coll Educ, Shijiazhuang 050024, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Cognit Neurosci & Learning, Beijing 100874, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Adv Ctr Future Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Open math problem; Closed math problem; Reactive cognitive flexibility; Spatial working memory; High school students; WORKING-MEMORY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; WORD; CHILDREN; DIFFICULTIES; ACHIEVEMENT; ANXIETY; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/ijop.12934
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Problem-solving skills are very important in our daily life. Almost all problem-solving studies have addressed the cognitive correlates of solving closed problems, but only limited studies have investigated the cognitive mechanisms of solving open problems. The current study aimed to systematically examine differences between the cognitive mechanisms used for solving open and closed problems. In total, the abilities of 142 high school students to solve open and closed problems were assessed, as were a series of general cognitive abilities as controlled variates. Analogical reasoning uniquely contributed to solving both open and closed math problems, after controlling for age, gender, and inductive reasoning. Reactive cognitive flexibility (measured using the Wisconsin card sorting test) and spatial working memory uniquely correlated only with solving open and closed math problems, respectively. These findings suggest that the cognitive processes used to solve open and closed math problems differ. Open and closed math problems appear to require more reactive cognitive flexibility for generation and more memory for retrieval, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 593
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Different cognitive mechanisms for process-open and process-constrained problem solving
    Li Wang
    Jieying Zeng
    Xiaomeng Ran
    Zhanling Cui
    Xinlin Zhou
    ZDM – Mathematics Education, 2022, 54 : 529 - 541
  • [2] Different cognitive mechanisms for process-open and process-constrained problem solving
    Wang, Li
    Zeng, Jieying
    Ran, Xiaomeng
    Cui, Zhanling
    Zhou, Xinlin
    ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2022, 54 (03): : 529 - 541
  • [3] Cognitive Backgrounds of Problem Solving: A Comparison of Open-ended vs. Closed Mathematics Problems
    Bahar, Abdulkadir
    Maker, C. June
    EURASIA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2015, 11 (06) : 1531 - 1546
  • [4] STRATEGIES FOR SOLVING MATH DOCUMENT PROBLEMS
    KIRSCH, IS
    MOSENTHAL, PB
    JOURNAL OF READING, 1993, 36 (06): : 498 - 501
  • [5] SOLVING KNOTTY PROBLEMS IN MATH AND BIOLOGY
    KOLATA, G
    SCIENCE, 1986, 231 (4745) : 1506 - 1508
  • [6] Spreadsheets as cognitive tools: A study of the impact of spreadsheets on problem solving of math story problems
    Lavidas, Kostas
    Komis, Vasilis
    Gialamas, Vasilis
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, 18 (01) : 113 - 129
  • [7] COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE MECHANISMS OF CREATIVE PROBLEMS SOLVING FACILITATION BY HUMOR
    Korovkin, S. Yu
    Nikiforova, O. S.
    EKSPERIMENTALNAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA, 2014, 7 (04): : 37 - 51
  • [8] The Benetech Math Editor: An Inclusive Multistep Math Editor for Solving Problems
    Soiffer, Neil
    COMPUTERS HELPING PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, PT I, 2018, 10896 : 565 - 572
  • [9] Solving Math Problems Approximately: A Developmental Perspective
    Ganor-Stern, Dana
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [10] Solving Math Word Problems with Teacher Supervision
    Liang, Zhenwen
    Zhang, Xiangliang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2021, 2021, : 3522 - 3528