Prediction of portal dosimetry quality assurance results using log files-derived errors and machine learning techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Lew, Kah Seng [1 ]
Chua, Clifford Ghee Ann [1 ]
Koh, Calvin Wei Yang [1 ]
Lee, James Cheow Lei [1 ]
Park, Sung Yong [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Hong Qi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Div Radiat Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Duke NUS Med Sch, Oncol Acad Clin Programme, Singapore, Singapore
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 12卷
关键词
machine learning; patient specific quality assurance; portal dosimetry; log file; radiotherapy; RADIOTHERAPY; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.1096838
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis work aims to use machine learning models to predict gamma passing rate of portal dosimetry quality assurance with log file derived features. This allows daily treatment monitoring for patients and reduce wear and tear on EPID detectors to save cost and prevent downtime. Methods578 VMAT trajectory log files selected from prostate, lung and spine SBRT were used in this work. Four machine learning models were explored to identify the best performing regression model for predicting gamma passing rate within each sub-site and the entire unstratified data. Predictors used in these models comprised of hand-crafted log file-derived features as well as modulation complexity score. Cross validation was used to evaluate the model performance in terms of R-2 and RMSE. ResultUsing gamma passing rate of 1%/1mm criteria and entire dataset, LASSO regression has a R-2 of 0.121 +/- 0.005 and RMSE of 4.794 +/- 0.013%, SVM regression has a R-2 of 0.605 +/- 0.036 and RMSE of 3.210 +/- 0.145%, Random Forest regression has a R-2 of 0.940 +/- 0.019 and RMSE of 1.233 +/- 0.197%. XGBoost regression has the best performance with a R-2 and RMSE value of 0.981 +/- 0.015 and 0.652 +/- 0.276%, respectively. ConclusionLog file-derived features can predict gamma passing rate of portal dosimetry with an average error of less than 2% using the 1%/1mm criteria. This model can potentially be applied to predict the patient specific QA results for every treatment fraction.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Portal dosimetry prediction using Pinnacle ® TPS for clinical quality assurance applications.
    Fawzi, M.
    Cerbah, Y.
    Eid, D.
    Mohamad, M. Alabdoaburas
    Sandjon, M.
    Belshi, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S730 - S730
  • [2] Patient-specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
    Chow, Vivian U. Y.
    Kan, Monica W. K.
    Chan, Anthony T. C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (11): : 179 - 187
  • [3] Water quality assurance in aquaculture ponds using Machine Learning and IoT techniques
    Quintero, Ricardo
    Parra, Jaqueline
    Felix, Francisco
    2022 IEEE MEXICAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE (ENC), 2022,
  • [4] Red Wine Quality Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Kumar, Sunny
    Agrawal, Kanika
    Mandan, Nelshan
    2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS (ICCCI - 2020), 2020, : 495 - 500
  • [5] Patient Specific Quality Assurance Using Machine Log Files for the Mevion S250i Proton Therapy System
    Bunker, A.
    Ahmad, S.
    Chen, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E325 - E325
  • [6] Paper quality enhancement and model prediction using machine learning techniques
    Devi, T. Kalavathi
    Priyanka, E. B.
    Sakthivel, P.
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 17
  • [7] Ethos Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Outcome Prediction Using Machine Learning
    Witztum, A.
    Hink, J.
    Wall, P. D. H.
    Neylon, J.
    Solberg, T. D.
    Lamb, J. M.
    Valdes, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (10) : 7706 - 7707
  • [8] Analysis and Prediction of Student Performance Based on Moodle Log Data using Machine Learning Techniques
    Kaensar C.
    Wongnin W.
    International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2023, 18 (10) : 184 - 203
  • [9] Prediction of water quality and LULC analysis using machine learning and geospatial techniques
    Kaur, Komalpreet
    Singh, Kanwarpreet
    Gupta, Sushindra Kumar
    Tiwary, Aditya Kumar
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 20 (01) : 275 - 294
  • [10] Prediction and Control of Coke Plant Wastewater Quality using Machine Learning Techniques
    Shweta Himanshu Khandelwal
    Adity Shrivastava
    Abhijit Ganguly
    Coke and Chemistry, 2020, 63 : 47 - 56