Optimal Incentives for Salespeople with Learning Potential

被引:6
|
作者
Gao, Long [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Sch Business, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
salesforce; learning; compensation; dynamic incentives; agency theory; information asymmetry; SALES FORCE; MORAL HAZARD; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; COMPENSATION; DESIGN; MULTIPERIOD; ORIENTATION; DISCLOSURE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2022.4509
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We study a compensation problem for salespeople with learning potential. In our model, both the firm and sales agent are risk neutral and forward-looking; the agent can privately observe his skill, exert effort, and learn from experience; the firm can learn from the agent's choice and revise sales targets over time. The problem entails a dynamic tradeoff between exploiting learning, screening information, and maximizing efficiency. We find the optimal compensation plan differs substantially from the existing ones: it sets aggressive targets for expediting skill development, and pays the information rent for neutralizing the agent's misbehaving temptation over the entire relationship. We find learning drives the long-run outcomes; ignoring it can mislead compensation design and inflict substantial losses. Our results shed light on when and why firms distort sales, favor incumbents, and prefer long-term plans. By highlighting the critical role of learning in long-run performance, this study advances our understanding of salesforce theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:3285 / 3296
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] When Do Group Incentives for Salespeople Work?
    Lim, Noah
    Chen, Hua
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2014, 51 (03) : 320 - 334
  • [2] When Salespeople Manage Customer Relationships: Multidimensional Incentives and Private Information
    Kim, Minkyung
    Sudhir, K.
    Uetake, Kosuke
    Canales, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2019, 56 (05) : 749 - 766
  • [3] Options, incentives, and salespeople: How the FLSA discriminates against nonexempt employees
    Bartl, TJ
    EMPLOYEE RELATIONS LAW JOURNAL, 2000, 26 (02) : 57 - 88
  • [4] A 2-PERIOD MODEL ON OPTIMAL TAXATION WITH LEARNING INCENTIVES
    BRUNNER, JK
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE, 1986, 46 (01): : 31 - 47
  • [5] Optimal incentives for teams
    Che, YK
    Yoo, SW
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (03): : 525 - 541
  • [6] OPTIMAL FORECASTING INCENTIVES
    OSBAND, K
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (05) : 1091 - 1112
  • [7] Learning and performance orientation of salespeople: The role of supervisors
    Kohli, AK
    Shervani, TA
    Challagalla, GN
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (02) : 263 - 274
  • [8] Who Should Be Given Incentives? Counterfactual Optimal Treatment Regimes Learning for Recommendation
    Li, Haoxuan
    Zheng, Chunyuan
    Wu, Peng
    Kuang, Kun
    Liu, Yue
    Cui, Peng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, KDD 2023, 2023, : 1235 - 1247
  • [9] Managerial Expertise, Learning Potential and Dynamic Incentives: Get More for Less?
    Lukas, Christian
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2007, 28 (03) : 195 - 211
  • [10] Learning by Blogging: Understanding Salespeople's Learning Experiences on Social Media
    Rollins, Minna
    Wei, Jack
    Nickell, David
    2014 47TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2014, : 1656 - 1665