Stacking ensemble learning models for daily runoff prediction using 1D and 2D CNNs

被引:63
|
作者
Xie, Yutong [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Miaomiao [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Shu [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zexi [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Xingyou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Runoff prediction; CNN; Dimensions; Stacking ensemble learning; Time steps; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; MONTHLY STREAMFLOW; RIVER; DECOMPOSITION; PERFORMANCE; BOOTSTRAP; FRAMEWORK; MACHINES; OUTPUTS; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119469
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In recent years, applications of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to runoff prediction have received some attention due to their excellent feature extraction capabilities. However, existing studies are still limited since merely either 1D or 2D CNNs are developed to predict runoff. In this study, a stacking ensemble learning model for daily runoff prediction based on different types of 1D and 2D CNNs is proposed and applied to the Quinebaug River Basin, Connecticut, USA. The structure of the CNN models is developed with reference to the classic LeNet5 network. Especially, the predictors are reconstructed into 1D vectors and 2D matrices with 10-, 20-and 30-day time steps. Totally 18 member models are constructed through selecting 3 representative 1D and 2D CNN models with 3 time steps. The simple average method (SAM) is used to integrate different CNN member models. The results show that the performance of the same-type SAM based on either 1D or 2D CNNs improves because it can counteract the effects of both positive and negative predicted values by the member models to some extent. Furthermore, the mixed-type SAM models based on both 1D and 2D CNN member models can further improve the prediction accuracy. The optimal model SAM15 consists of two 1D CNNs and four 2D CNNs. Compared with the optimal CNN member models, SAM15 reduces the validation RMSE by about 13% and improves the vali-dation R and NSE by about 3% and 7%, respectively. This study highlights that the proposed stacking ensemble learning model can improve the daily runoff prediction accuracy through integration of the nonlinear fitting ability of 1D and 2D CNN member models.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Stacking Ensemble Model of Various Machine Learning Models for Daily Runoff Forecasting
    Lu, Mingshen
    Hou, Qinyao
    Qin, Shujing
    Zhou, Lihao
    Hua, Dong
    Wang, Xiaoxia
    Cheng, Lei
    WATER, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [2] Discriminating seismic events using 1D and 2D CNNs: applications to volcanic and tectonic datasets
    Masaru Nakano
    Daisuke Sugiyama
    Earth, Planets and Space, 74
  • [3] Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D Coupled (Sewer/Surface) Hydraulic Models for Urban Flood Simulation
    Leandro, Jorge
    Chen, Albert S.
    Djordjevic, Slobodan
    Savic, Dragan A.
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2009, 135 (06): : 495 - 504
  • [4] Coupling of 1D and 2D models for river flow modelling
    Finaud-Guyot, Pascal
    Delenne, Carole
    Guinot, Vincent
    HOUILLE BLANCHE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE L EAU, 2011, (03): : 23 - 28
  • [5] 2D versus 1D models for Shallow Water Equations
    Vila, Jean Paul
    Chazel, Florent
    Noble, Pascal
    24TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS - FOUNDATION OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2017, 20 : 167 - 174
  • [6] Integrating 1D and 2D hydrodynamic models for flood simulation
    Lin, B
    Wicks, JM
    Falconer, RA
    Adams, K
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 159 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [7] Modelling of single-electron 1D and 2D arrays using physical models
    Abramov, I. I.
    Ignatenko, S. A.
    Lavrinovich, A. M.
    Pavlenok, S. N.
    2005 15TH INTERNATIONAL CRIMEAN CONFERENCE MICROWAVE & TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 619 - 620
  • [8] The prediction of crystal densities of a big data set using 1D and 2D structure features
    Li, Xianlan
    Kong, Dingling
    Luan, Yue
    Guo, Lili
    Lu, Yanhua
    Li, Wei
    Tang, Meng
    Zhang, Qingyou
    Pang, Aimin
    STRUCTURAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 35 (05) : 1375 - 1385
  • [9] The prediction of crystal densities of a big data set using 1D and 2D structure features
    Henan Engineering Research Center of Industrial Circulating Water Treatment, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Materials, Henan University, Kaifeng
    475004, China
    不详
    441003, China
    不详
    150001, China
    Struct Chem, 5 (1375-1385):
  • [10] 1D and 2D structured mass-spring models with preload
    Xiuzhong Wang
    Venkat Devarajan
    The Visual Computer, 2005, 21 : 429 - 448