Low risk is low risk, regardless of race or ethnicity: Outcomes of prostate cancer active surveillance and factors associated with reclassification in a racially diverse cohort

被引:0
|
作者
Labagnara, Kevin [1 ]
Zhu, Denzel [1 ,2 ]
Loloi, Justin [1 ]
Shreck, Evan [1 ]
Abeshouse, Marnie [3 ]
Watts, Kara L. [1 ]
Sankin, Alex [1 ]
Aboumohamed, Ahmed A. [1 ]
Kovac, Evan [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[5] Canc Inst New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
关键词
Active surveillance; Prostate cancer; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MEN; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.01.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Active surveillance (AS) is the standard for very low- and low-risk prostate cancer. Although risk factors for pathologic reclassification while on AS have been identified, results are mixed for non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic ethnicity. We aim to further explore how race and ethnicity may be affecting AS participation and outcomes in a primarily urban, diverse, and vulnerable population. Materials and Methods: Patients eligible for AS from 2005-2020 were reviewed. Demographics, race/ethnicity, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, and pathologic characteristics were analyzed between patients enrolled in AS and those that underwent immediate therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates. Cox proportional hazards models were used to develop prediction models for clinical reclassification. Results: A total of 471 men were eligible for AS. Of those, 188 (39.9%) enrolled in AS while 283 (60.1%) underwent immediate radical therapy. No significant differences were found in racial/ethnic composition between the AS and immediate treatment groups. In our AS cohort, 79 (42.0%) experienced clinical reclassification and underwent deferred treatment. BCR rates were similar between treatment groups. Race/ethnicity were not found to be predictors of clinical reclassification, while metrics at diagnostic biopsy such as elevated PSA, higher PSA density, and lower prostate volume increased reclassification odds. Conclusions: In our diverse population, NHB race and Hispanic ethnicity were not significant predictors of adverse reclassification while on AS. Our findings support utilizing other metrics taken at initial biopsy to identify high-risk patients such as PSA, prostate volume, and PSA density. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:204e7 / 204e15
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PATHOLOGICAL RECLASSIFICATION OF LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Ho, Austin Y.
    Li, Eric
    Bennett, Richard
    Aguiar, Jonathan
    Kumar, Sai
    Neill, Clayton
    Sun, Zequn
    Schaeffer, Edward
    Patel, Hiten
    Ross, Ashley
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E972 - E972
  • [2] Outcomes and factors associated with reclassification in a multiethnic cohort enrolled in active surveillance for prostate cancer.
    Zhu, Denzel
    Loloi, Justin
    Shreck, Evan
    Abeshouse, Marnie
    Sankin, Alexander
    Watts, Kara
    Stern, Joshua M.
    Aboumohamed, Ahmed A.
    Kovac, Evan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (06)
  • [3] VERY LOW RISK VS. LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER DESIGNATIONS IN AN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE COHORT
    Cohen, Andrew J.
    Pariser, Joseph J.
    Lapin, Brittany
    Wang, Chi-Hsiung
    Helfand, Brian T.
    McGuire, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E158 - E158
  • [4] Active surveillance in low risk prostate cancer
    Bozkurt, Ozan
    Demir, Omer
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2013, 12 (02): : 76 - 79
  • [5] Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer
    Lellig, K.
    Beyer, B.
    Graefen, M.
    Zaak, D.
    Stief, C.
    UROLOGE, 2014, 53 (07): : 1031 - 1039
  • [6] Active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer
    Gnanappiragasam, S.
    Forde, J. C.
    Moloney, M.
    Kiely, S.
    Walsh, K.
    Durkan, G. C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 : 24 - 24
  • [7] GRADE RECLASSIFICATION IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN WITH VERY LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Simopoulos, Demetrios
    Landis, Patricia
    Epstein, Jonathan
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Gorin, Michael
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E700 - E700
  • [8] Extended Followup and Risk Factors for Disease Reclassification in a Large Active Surveillance Cohort for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Welty, Christopher J.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Nguyen, Hao
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Perez, Nannette
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Chan, June M.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Simko, Jeffry P.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (03): : 807 - 811
  • [9] Active Surveillance for the Management of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in a Japanese Cohort
    Takeda, H.
    Nakano, Y.
    Kashiwagi, Y.
    Kojima, I
    Takai, S.
    Fujita, T.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S292 - S293
  • [10] Pathological Outcomes in Men with Low Risk and Very Low Risk Prostate Cancer: Implications on the Practice of Active Surveillance
    Adamy, Ari
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (04): : 1222 - 1223