Indigenous food sovereignty assessment-A systematic literature review

被引:5
|
作者
Abdul, Malika [1 ]
Ingabire, Ale [1 ]
Lam, Chin Yu Nicole [1 ]
Bennett, Bindi [2 ]
Menzel, Kelly [3 ]
MacKenzie-Shalders, Kristen [1 ]
van Herwerden, Louise [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Australia
[2] Federat Univ, Natl Ctr Reconciliat Truth & Justice, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Southern Cross Univ, Gnibi Coll Indigenous Australian Peoples, Gold Coast, Australia
[4] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, 14 Univ Dr, Gold Coast, Qld 4226, Australia
关键词
assessment; culture; data sovereignty; food; food sovereignty; Indigenous peoples; 1ST NATIONS; TRADITIONAL FOODS; COMMUNITIES; SECURITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1111/1747-0080.12813
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
AimsThe aims of this systematic review were to (1) identify assessment approaches of Indigenous food sovereignty using the core domains of community ownership, inclusion of traditional food knowledge, inclusion/promotion of cultural foods and environmental/intervention sustainability, (2) describe Indigenous research methodologies when assessing Indigenous food sovereignty. MethodsGuided by Indigenous members of the research team, a systematic review across four databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO) was performed. Studies in any language from 1996 to 2021, that used one or more of the core domains (identified from a recent scoping review) of community ownership, inclusion of traditional food knowledge, inclusion/promotion of cultural foods and environmental/intervention sustainability were included. ResultsFrom 20 062 records, after exclusion criteria were applied, 34 studies were included. Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches were mostly qualitative (n = 17) or mixed methods (n = 16), with interviews the most utilised (n = 29), followed by focus groups and meetings (n = 23) and validated frameworks (n = 7) as assessment tools. Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches were mostly around inclusion of traditional food knowledge (n = 21), or environmental/intervention sustainability (n = 15). Community-Based Participatory Research approaches were utilised across many studies (n = 26), with one-third utilising Indigenous methods of inquiry. Acknowledgement of data sovereignty (n = 6) or collaboration with Indigenous researchers (n = 4) was limited. ConclusionThis review highlights Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches in the literature worldwide. It emphasises the importance of using Indigenous research methodologies in research conducted by or with Indigenous Peoples and acknowledges Indigenous communities should lead future research in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 27
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modes of modelling assessment-a literature review
    Frejd, Peter
    EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS, 2013, 84 (03) : 413 - 438
  • [2] Updates on Caries Risk Assessment-A Literature Review
    Ng, Toby Cheuk-Hang
    Luo, Bella Weijia
    Lam, Walter Yu-Hang
    Baysan, Aylin
    Chu, Chun-Hung
    Yu, Ollie Yiru
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [3] Drivers of the food system based on food sovereignty domains: an integrative systematic literature review
    Rivera, Igor
    de Leon, Denise Diaz
    Perez-Salazar, Maria del Rosario
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [4] Consumer sovereignty: a systematic literature review
    Borna, Shaheen
    Elhajjar, Samer
    Gu, Qiannong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2024, 39 (04) : 228 - 246
  • [5] Temporal issues in life cycle assessment-a systematic review
    Lueddeckens, Stefan
    Saling, Peter
    Guenther, Edeltraud
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (08): : 1385 - 1401
  • [6] ONCOLOGY SEQUENCE MODELS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT-A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Xue, W.
    Huang, M.
    Ramsey, S. D.
    Gu, C.
    Xie, J.
    Wu, E.
    Pellissier, J.
    Briggs, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S69 - S70
  • [7] Food sovereignty and autonomy for indigenous health as resistance to food globalization: Scoping review
    Farfan, Juan Camilo Calderon
    Medina, Diego Fernando Rosero
    Ninco, Yeymi Acevedo
    Marulanda, Sergio Cristancho
    Torres, Dolly Arias
    GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 37
  • [8] Improving Indigenous Food Sovereignty through sustainable food production: a narrative review
    Rowe, Sarah
    Brady, Catherine
    Sarang, Rhea
    Wiipongwii, Troy
    Leu, Matthias
    Jennings, Lydia
    Peterson, Tomalita
    Boston, Juan
    Roach, Beth
    Phillips, Jessica
    Conrad, Zach
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [9] Elements of Successful Food Sovereignty Interventions within Indigenous Communities in the United States and Canada: a Systematic Review
    Gutierrez, Belinda, V
    Kaloostian, Damita
    Redvers, Nicole
    CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 7 (09):
  • [10] Artificial senses and their fusion as a booming technique in food quality assessment-a review
    Kiran, Ekaspreet
    Kaur, Kamaljit
    Aggarwal, Poonam
    QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SAFETY OF CROPS & FOODS, 2022, 14 (03) : 9 - 18