Personnel selection: A review of ways to maximize validity, diversity, and the applicant experience

被引:15
|
作者
Van Iddekinge, Chad H. [1 ,4 ]
Lievens, Filip [2 ]
Sackett, Paul R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Tippie Coll Business, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Singapore Management Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Business, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Tippie Coll Business, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, 108 John Pappajohn Business Bldg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
applicant; perceptions; reactions; selection-methods; selection-validation; SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS; CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; COGNITIVE-ABILITY TESTS; GENERAL MENTAL-ABILITY; FRAME-OF-REFERENCE; PERSONALITY SCALE SCORES; REDUCING ADVERSE IMPACT; JOB-PERFORMANCE; EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1111/peps.12578
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Personnel Psychology has a long tradition of publishing important research on personnel selection. In this article, we review some of the key questions and findings from studies published in the journal and in the selection literature more broadly. In doing so, we focus on the various decisions organizations face regarding selection procedure development (e.g., use multiple selection procedures, contextualize procedure content), administration (e.g., provide pre-test explanations, reveal target knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics [KSAOs]), and scoring (e.g., weight predictors and criteria, use artificial intelligence). Further, we focus on how these decisions affect the validity of inferences drawn from the procedures, how use of the procedures may affect organizational diversity, and how applicants experience the procedures. We also consider factors such as cost and time. Based on our review, we highlight practical implications and key directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 686
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Personnel selection in the digital age: a review of validity and applicant reactions, and future research challenges
    Woods, Stephen A.
    Ahmed, Sara
    Nikolaou, Ioannis
    Costa, Ana Cristina
    Anderson, Neil R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 29 (01) : 64 - 77
  • [2] Emotional Intelligence in Personnel Selection: Applicant reactions, criterion, and incremental validity
    Iliescu, Dragos
    Ilie, Alexandra
    Ispas, Dan
    Ion, Andrei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2012, 20 (03) : 347 - 358
  • [3] Selection interview: A review of validity evidence, adverse impact and applicant reactions
    Moscoso, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, 8 (04) : 237 - 247
  • [4] Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection
    Honkaniemi, Laura
    Tolvanen, Asko
    Feldt, Taru
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 52 (04) : 376 - 381
  • [5] Holistic Review in Applicant Selection: A Scoping Review
    Gottlieb, Michael
    Davenport, Dayle
    Landry, Adaira
    Bailey, Jacob
    Westrick, Jennifer
    Daniel, Michelle
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2025, 100 (02) : 219 - 228
  • [6] A review of applicant faking in selection interviews
    Melchers, Klaus G.
    Roulin, Nicolas
    Buehl, Anne-Kathrin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 28 (02) : 123 - 142
  • [7] The Five Factor Model in personnel selection: Measurement equivalence between applicant and non-applicant groups
    Vecchione, Michele
    Alessandri, Guido
    Barbaranelli, Claudio
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 52 (04) : 503 - 508
  • [8] Personnel selection systems and diversity
    Berry, Christopher M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 60
  • [9] Validity of assessment centers for personnel selection
    Thornton, George C., III
    Gibbons, Alyssa M.
    HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2009, 19 (03) : 169 - 187
  • [10] PERSONNEL-SELECTION DECISIONS - EFFECTS OF APPLICANT PERSONALITY AND THE LETTER OF REFERENCE
    PAUNONEN, SV
    JACKSON, DN
    OBERMAN, SM
    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1987, 40 (01) : 96 - 114