共 50 条
Personnel selection: A review of ways to maximize validity, diversity, and the applicant experience
被引:15
|作者:
Van Iddekinge, Chad H.
[1
,4
]
Lievens, Filip
[2
]
Sackett, Paul R.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Iowa, Tippie Coll Business, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Singapore Management Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Business, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Tippie Coll Business, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, 108 John Pappajohn Business Bldg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词:
applicant;
perceptions;
reactions;
selection-methods;
selection-validation;
SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS;
CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY;
HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;
COGNITIVE-ABILITY TESTS;
GENERAL MENTAL-ABILITY;
FRAME-OF-REFERENCE;
PERSONALITY SCALE SCORES;
REDUCING ADVERSE IMPACT;
JOB-PERFORMANCE;
EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW;
D O I:
10.1111/peps.12578
中图分类号:
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号:
040203 ;
摘要:
Personnel Psychology has a long tradition of publishing important research on personnel selection. In this article, we review some of the key questions and findings from studies published in the journal and in the selection literature more broadly. In doing so, we focus on the various decisions organizations face regarding selection procedure development (e.g., use multiple selection procedures, contextualize procedure content), administration (e.g., provide pre-test explanations, reveal target knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics [KSAOs]), and scoring (e.g., weight predictors and criteria, use artificial intelligence). Further, we focus on how these decisions affect the validity of inferences drawn from the procedures, how use of the procedures may affect organizational diversity, and how applicants experience the procedures. We also consider factors such as cost and time. Based on our review, we highlight practical implications and key directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 686
页数:36
相关论文