General deficits of attentional inhibition in high trait anxiety: ERP evidence

被引:4
|
作者
Hu, Liping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tang, Hongsi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Yan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Brain Connectome & Behav, CAS Key Lab Brain Connectome & Manipulat, Brain Cognit & Brain Dis Inst BCBDI,Shenzhen Inst, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Hong Kong Inst Brain Sci Shenzhen Fundam, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
trait anxiety; attentional inhibition; attentional control; non-emotional; ERP; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; THREAT; STATE; DISTRACTION; SUPPRESSION; CAPTURE; TARGET; BIAS; MECHANISMS; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bhad038
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Behavioral evidence shows that individuals with high trait anxiety tend to be distracted by irrelevant stimulation not only for threat-related stimuli but also for non-emotional neutral stimuli. These findings suggest that there may be a general deficit of attentional control in trait anxiety. However, the neural mechanism underlying the anxiety-related deficit in attentional control, especially inhibition function, is still unclear. Here, we examined the attentional processing of the non-emotional neutral distractor on 66 young adults with different levels of trait anxiety, using the ERP indices of attentional selection (N2pc) and top-down inhibition (Pd) in a search task with geometric stimuli. We found that the distractor-evoked N2pc amplitude did not vary with anxiety levels, but increased anxiety was associated with smaller Pds (i.e. worse inhibition). Besides, delayed attentional selection of targets was associated with higher anxiety levels. These correlations of trait anxiety remained significant even after controlling for state anxiety, and state anxiety did not affect the attentional processing of distractors and targets, suggesting that trait anxiety, not current anxiety, affects attentional function. Our findings clarify the mechanism underlying the general attentional deficits in trait anxiety, e.g. reduced distractor inhibition and delayed target selection.
引用
收藏
页码:7288 / 7296
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] General deficits of attentional inhibition in high trait anxiety: ERP evidence (feb, 10.1093/cercor/bhad038, 2023)
    Garcia, Ernest
    Piccinelli, Marina
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2023, 33 (09) : 5759 - 5759
  • [2] Attentional capture and trait anxiety: Evidence from inhibition of return
    Perez-Duenas, Carolina
    Acosta, Alberto
    Lupianez, Juan
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2009, 23 (06) : 782 - 790
  • [3] Implicit Emotion Regulation Deficits in Trait Anxiety: An ERP Study
    Liu, Bingqian
    Wang, Yi
    Li, Xuebing
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [4] Social anxiety and attentional bias variability: electrophysiological evidence of attentional control deficits
    Yuan, Jing
    Mao, Ningning
    Chen, Rongrong
    Zhang, Qin
    Cui, Lixia
    NEUROREPORT, 2019, 30 (13) : 887 - 892
  • [5] The relationship between trait anxiety and attentional bias in archers-An ERP study
    Lung, I-Fu
    Chuang, Lan-Ya
    Hung, Tsung-Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 77 (03) : 293 - 293
  • [6] ATTENTIONAL BIAS IN HIGH AND LOW TRAIT ANXIETY SUBJECTS
    VANDENBERGH, O
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 471 - 471
  • [7] Fear Inhibition in High Trait Anxiety
    Kindt, Merel
    Soeter, Marieke
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [8] Neural Correlates Related to Anxiety in Attentional Inhibition Control: an ERP Study
    S. H. Seo
    Ch. K. Lee
    S. K. Yoo
    Neurophysiology, 2014, 46 : 428 - 437
  • [9] Neural Correlates Related to Anxiety in Attentional Inhibition Control: an ERP Study
    Seo, S. H.
    Lee, Ch. K.
    Yoo, S. K.
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 46 (05) : 428 - 437
  • [10] Response inhibition deficits are positively associated with trait rumination, but attentional inhibition deficits are not: aggressive behaviors and interpersonal stressors as mediators
    Hasegawa, Akira
    Matsumoto, Noboru
    Yamashita, Yuko
    Tanaka, Keisuke
    Kawaguchi, Jun
    Yamamoto, Tetsuya
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2022, 86 (03): : 858 - 870