Use of different anticholinergic scales and their correlation with anticholinergic symptom burden in a cohort of people living with HIV

被引:3
|
作者
Mazzitelli, Maria [1 ]
Trunfio, Mattia [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Coin, Alessandra [6 ]
Sasset, Lolita [1 ]
Farina, Jacopo [6 ]
Brundu, Monica [1 ]
Scaglione, Vincenzo [1 ]
Devita, Maria [7 ]
Sergi, Giuseppe [6 ]
Cattelan, Anna M. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Padua Univ Hosp, Infect & Trop Dis Unit, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Amedeo Savoia Hosp, Dept Med Sci, Infect Dis Unit, I-10149 Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, HIV Neurobehav Res Program, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Neurosci, San Diego, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Padua Univ Hosp, Geriatr Unit, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[7] Univ Padua, Gen Psychol Dept, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[8] Univ Padua, Dept Mol Med, I-35128 Padua, Italy
关键词
OLDER-ADULTS; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; BENZODIAZEPINE USE; ELDERLY-PEOPLE; MEDICATION USE; QT INTERVAL; RISK; POLYPHARMACY; DRUGS; PROLONGATION;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkad348
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: How to detect the clinical impact of anticholinergic (AC) burden in people with HIV (PWH) remains poorly investigated. We cross-sectionally described the prevalence and type of AC signs/symptoms and the screening accuracy of three AC scales in detecting their presence in a modern cohort of PWH. Methods: We calculated AC Burden Scale (ABS), AC Risk Score (ARS) and AC Drug Score (ADS) in 721 adult PWH and recorded the presence of AC signs/symptoms over the previous 3 months. High AC risk was defined by ABS score >= 2, and ARS or ADS score >= 3. Comparisons among the scale were based on Cohen's inter-rater agreement, and their screening accuracy was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and performance measures. Results: We enrolled 721 PWH, of whom 72.0% of participants were male; the median age was 53 years, and 164 participants (22.7%) were on at least one AC drug. Among these, 28.6% experienced at least one AC sign/ symptom. Agreement in AC risk classification was substantial only between ARS and ADS (k = 0.6). Lower and higher risk of AC signs/symptoms was associated with dual regimens [adjusted OR (aOR) = 0.12 versus three-drug regimens, P = 0.002] and increasing number of AC drugs (aOR = 12.91, P < 0.001). Depression and COPD were also associated with higher risk of AC signs/symptoms in analysis unadjusted for number of AC drugs. ABS and ADS showed the best area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.85 (0.78-0.92) and 0.84 (0.75-0.92; P < 0.001 for both). However, at the cut-off used for the general population, the sensitivity of all three scales was very low (34.0%, 46.8% and 46.8%). Conclusions: Up to one-fourth of participants in our cohort were exposed to at least one AC drug, and among them AC signs/symptoms affected more than one-fourth. Both polypharmacy (as number of antiretrovirals and of co-medications with AC properties) and to a lesser extent specific comorbidities shaped the risk of developing AC signs/symptoms. Sensitive screenings for AC risk in PWH should prefer ABS or ADS based on lower cut-offs than those suggested for the general population.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 77
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Polypharmacy and evaluation of anticholinergic risk in a cohort of elderly people living with HIV
    Mazzitelli, Maria
    Milinkovic, Ana
    Pereira, Branca
    Palmer, James
    Tong, Timothy
    Asboe, David
    Boffito, Marta
    AIDS, 2019, 33 (15) : 2439 - 2441
  • [2] Anticholinergic burden quantified by anticholinergic risk scales and adverse outcomes in older people: a systematic review
    Salahudeen, Mohammed Saji
    Duffull, Stephen B.
    Nishtala, Prasad S.
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2015, 15
  • [3] Anticholinergic burden quantified by anticholinergic risk scales and adverse outcomes in older people: a systematic review
    Mohammed Saji Salahudeen
    Stephen B Duffull
    Prasad S Nishtala
    BMC Geriatrics, 15
  • [4] Anticholinergic risk: Use and limitations of anticholinergic scales
    Ma Villalba-Moreno, Angela
    Rocio Alfaro-Lara, Eva
    Santos-Ramos, Bernardo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 26 (10) : E65 - E66
  • [5] Cognitive impact of anticholinergic and sedative burden in people with HIV
    Michael, Henry Ukachukwu
    Brouillette, Marie-Josee
    Tamblyn, Robyn
    Fellows, Lesley K.
    Mayo, Nancy E.
    AIDS, 2024, 38 (13) : 1819 - 1828
  • [6] Evaluation of the association of anticholinergic burden and delirium in older hospitalised patients - A cohort study comparing 19 anticholinergic burden scales
    Lisibach, Angela
    Gallucci, Giulia
    Benelli, Valerie
    Kalin, Ramona
    Schulthess, Sven
    Beeler, Patrick E.
    Csajka, Chantal
    Lutters, Monika
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 88 (11) : 4915 - 4927
  • [7] Concordance among anticholinergic burden scales
    Naples, Jennifer G.
    Marcum, Zachary A.
    Perera, Subashan
    Gray, Shelly L.
    Newman, Anne B.
    Simonsick, Eleanor M.
    Yaffe, Kristine
    Shorr, Ronald I.
    Hanlon, Joseph T.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 : 99 - 100
  • [8] Concordance Between Anticholinergic Burden Scales
    Naples, Jennifer G.
    Marcum, Zachary A.
    Perera, Subashan
    Gray, Shelly L.
    Newman, Anne B.
    Simonsick, Eleanor M.
    Yaffe, Kristine
    Shorr, Ronald I.
    Hanlon, Joseph T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 (10) : 2120 - 2124
  • [9] Concordance Among Anticholinergic Burden Scales
    Naples, J. G.
    Marcum, Z.
    Perera, S.
    Gray, S. L.
    Newman, A. B.
    Shorr, R. I.
    Simonsick, E. M.
    Yaffe, K.
    Hanlon, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 : S7 - S7
  • [10] High anticholinergic burden at admission associated with in-hospital mortality in older patients: A comparison of 19 different anticholinergic burden scales
    Lisibach, Angela
    Gallucci, Giulia
    Beeler, Patrick E.
    Csajka, Chantal
    Lutters, Monika
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 130 (02) : 288 - 300