Comparative performance analysis of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0 and Bard in answering common patient questions on melanoma<show/>

被引：1

作者：

Deliyannis, Eduardo Panaiotis ^{[1
]}

Paul, Navreet ^{[2
]}

Patel, Priya U. ^{[2
]}

Papanikolaou, Marieta ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Kings Lynn, England

[2] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Dermatol Dept, Norwich, England

[3] Kings Coll London, St Johns Inst Dermatol, Sch Basic & Med Biosci, London, England

来源：

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY | 2024年 / 49卷 / 07期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1093/ced/llad409

中图分类号：

R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];

学科分类号：

100206 ;

摘要：

This study evaluates the effectiveness of ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0, and Google's Bard in answering patient questions on melanoma. Results show that both versions of ChatGPT outperform Bard, particularly in readability, with no significant difference between the two ChatGPT versions. The study underscores the potential of large language models in healthcare, highlighting the need for professional oversight and further research.

引用

页码：743 / 746

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] Comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Bard in answering pathology examination questions requiring image interpretation
Apornvirat, Sompon
Namboonlue, Chutimon
Laohawetwanit, Thiyaphat
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2024, 162 (03) : 252 - 260
[2] Performance of ChatGPT on Solving Orthopedic Board-Style Questions: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4
Kim, Sung Eun
Lee, Ji Han
Choi, Byung Sun
Han, Hyuk-Soo
Lee, Myung Chul
Ro, Du Hyun
CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (04) : 669 - 673
[3] News Verifiers Showdown: A Comparative Performance Evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0, Bing AI, and Bard in News Fact-Checking
Caramancion, Kevin Matthe
2023 IEEE FUTURE NETWORKS WORLD FORUM, FNWF, 2024,
[4] Evaluating ChatGPT's performance in answering common patient questions on cervical cancer
Do, Anthony
Li, Andrew
Smith, Haller
Chambers, Laura
Esselen, Kate
Liang, Margaret
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190 : S376 - S376
[5] AI IN HEPATOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CHATGPT-4, BING, AND BARD AT ANSWERING CLINICAL QUESTIONS
Anvari, Sama
Lee, Yung
Jin, David S.
Malone, Sarah
Collins, Matthew
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S888 - S888
[6] Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard
Lim, Zhi Wei
Pushpanathan, Krithi
Yew, Samantha Min Er
Lai, Yien
Sun, Chen-Hsin
Lam, Janice Sing Harn
Chen, David Ziyou
Goh, Jocelyn Hui Lin
Tan, Marcus Chun Jin
Sheng, Bin
Cheng, Ching-Yu
Koh, Victor Teck Chang
Tham, Yih-Chung
EBIOMEDICINE, 2023, 95
[7] Artificial intelligence in hepatology: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard at answering clinical questions
Anvari, Sama
Lee, Yung
Jin, David Shiqiang
Malone, Sarah
Collins, Matthew
JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2025,
[8] Burn Patient Education in the Modern Age: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Performance Answering Common Questions on Burn Injury and Management
Pandya, Sumaarg
Bonetti, Mario Alessandri
Liu, Hilary Y.
Jeong, Tiffany
Ziembicki, Jenny A.
Egro, Francesco M.
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2025,
[9] A comparative evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 in responses to selected genetics questions
McGrath, Scott P.
Kozel, Beth A.
Gracefo, Sara
Sutherland, Nykole
Danford, Christopher J.
Walton, Nephi
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2024, 31 (10) : 2271 - 2283
[10] Evaluating ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 Responses on Hyperlipidemia for Patient Education
Lee, Thomas J.
Rao, Abhinav K.
Campbell, Daniel J.
Radfar, Navid
Dayal, Manik
Khrais, Ayham
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →