The CGIAR needs a revolution

被引:8
|
作者
McIntire, John
Dobermann, Achim
机构
关键词
CGIAR; One CGIAR; International agricultural research; AGRICULTURAL-RESEARCH; SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION; GREEN-REVOLUTION; ADOPTION; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100712
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The CGIAR is a unique scientific organization that seeks to improve food security for low-income people. It should be leading efforts to generate sustainable productivity gains in agriculture, especially in sub-Saharan Africa where productivity lags. However, its current ill-adapted priorities and structure, its obsession with reorganizations, and its unproductive ventures into local development projects have reduced its impact and rendered it unable to respond to the challenge of food security under climate change. The system's efforts have become too diffuse and ineffective while attempts to revive impact through repeated re-organizations have failed. The CGIAR has unique strengths: access to plant germplasm, know-how to improve germplasm and agronomic practices, global networks of experimental sites and research collaborators, and excellent staff. The CGIAR's scientists are highly motivated, but leaders and funders of the system have failed to support them with a simple, focused, and better funded operational environment needed to succeed in their research - and have greater impact from it. This can be corrected. We propose a scientific and problem-driven focus on fewer global and regional research priorities, supported by adequate long-term funding, rigorous methods of project evaluation, and management that stimulates innovation and seeks verifiable results. These supports do not exist today and we do not see that the current One CGIAR system will provide them in the foreseeable future.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender research in the CGIAR: The revolution is far from over☆
    Quisumbing, Agnes R.
    Doss, Cheryl R.
    Peterman, Amber
    GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 40
  • [2] Reply to "Gender research in the CGIAR: The revolution is far from over"
    Mcintire, John
    Dobermann, Achim
    GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 40
  • [4] The CGIAR at a crossroads?
    Shands, H
    GLOBAL PUBLIC POLICIES AND PROGRAMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR FINANCING AND EVALUATION, 2001, : 139 - 144
  • [5] NRM impact assessment in the CGIAR: Meeting the challenge and implications for CGIAR centres
    Kelley, TG
    Gregersen, HM
    NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN AGRICULTURE: METHODS FOR ASSESSING ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, 2005, : 341 - +
  • [6] Taxonomy needs evolution, not revolution
    S. Knapp
    R. M. Bateman
    N. R. Chalmers
    C. J. Humphries
    P. S. Rainbow
    A. B. Smith
    P. D. Taylor
    R. I. Vane-Wright
    M. Wilkinson
    Nature, 2002, 419 : 559 - 559
  • [7] 'EMS needs revolution not evolution'
    Williams, Rob
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2023, 192 (04) : 177 - 177
  • [8] Economics needs a scientific revolution
    Bouchaud, Jean-Philippe
    NATURE, 2008, 455 (7217) : 1181 - 1181
  • [9] Disease surveillance needs a revolution
    Declan Butler
    Nature, 2006, 440 : 6 - 7
  • [10] Disease surveillance needs a revolution
    Butler, D
    NATURE, 2006, 440 (7080) : 6 - 7