Combining low-volatility and momentum: recent evidence from the Nordic equities

被引:0
|
作者
Grobys, Klaus [1 ,3 ]
Fatmy, Veda [2 ]
Rajalin, Topias [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vaasa, Sch Accounting & Finance, Finance Res Grp, Innovat & Entrepreneurship InnoLab, Vaasa, Finland
[2] Univ Vaasa, Sch Accounting & Finance, Finance Res Grp, Vaasa, Finland
[3] Univ Vaasa, Sch Accounting & Finance, Finance Res Grp, Innovat & Entrepreneurship InnoLab, Wolffintie 34, Vaasa 65200, Finland
关键词
Efficient markets; volatility effect; momentum; stock markets; asset pricing; G10; G11; G14; G15; RISK; RETURNS; EQUILIBRIUM; WORK;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2024.2337806
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the profitability of combined low-volatility and momentum investment strategies in the Nordic stock markets from January 1999 to September 2022. Confirming earlier studies, our results first indicate that both the volatility and momentum effects persist as pure-play strategies. Further, we explore combined strategies using 50/50, double screening, and ranking strategies. Among the long-only portfolios, the momentum-first strategy generates the best Sharpe ratio using the double screening method-slightly outperforming the ranking method. Additionally, all long-only combination portfolios outperform the market in terms of risk-adjusted returns. Combination long-short strategies produce significantly higher risk-adjusted returns than pure-play strategies. Surprisingly, novel evidence suggests that none of the combination long-short strategies outperforms the pure momentum strategy after risk-adjusting the returns using the Fama and French five-factor model, implying that while momentum may enhance the returns from the low-volatility strategy, the reverse is not true for the Nordic stock markets.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low-Volatility Cycles: The Influence of Valuation and Momentum on Low-Volatility Portfolios
    Garcia-Feijoo, Luis
    Kochard, Lawrence
    Sullivan, Rodney N.
    Wang, Peng
    FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2015, 71 (03) : 47 - 60
  • [2] Combining value and momentum: evidence from the Nordic equity market
    Grobys, Klaus
    Huhta-Halkola, Topi
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (26) : 2872 - 2884
  • [3] Formation of Low-Volatility Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere: Recent Advancements and Insights
    Barsanti, Kelley C.
    Kroll, Jesse H.
    Thornton, Joel A.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2017, 8 (07): : 1503 - 1511
  • [4] Funding liquidity risk and the low-volatility anomaly: Evidence from the Taiwan stock market
    Hsu, Ching-Chi
    Wei, An-Pin
    Chen, Miao-Ling
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 54
  • [5] A global perspective on aerosol from low-volatility organic compounds
    Pye, H. O. T.
    Seinfeld, J. H.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (09) : 4377 - 4401
  • [6] The Low-Volatility Anomaly: Market Evidence on Systematic Risk vs. Mispricing
    Li, Xi
    Sullivan, Rodney N.
    Garcia-Feijoo, Luis
    FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2016, 72 (01) : 36 - 47
  • [7] Formation of highly oxygenated low-volatility products from cresol oxidation
    Schwantes, Rebecca H.
    Schilling, Katherine A.
    McVay, Renee C.
    Lignell, Hanna
    Coggon, Matthew M.
    Zhang, Xuan
    Wennberg, Paul O.
    Seinfeld, John H.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2017, 17 (05) : 3453 - 3474
  • [8] Indoor Dust/Air Partitioning: Evidence for Kinetic Delay in Equilibration for Low-Volatility SVOCs
    Parnis, J. Mark
    Taskovic, T.
    Celsie, Alena K. D.
    Mackay, Donald
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (11) : 6723 - 6729
  • [9] Superior forecasting with simple AR(1) models in a low-volatility environment: evidence from the CAT bond market
    Guertler, Marc
    Witowski, Eileen
    JOURNAL OF ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [10] Further evidence in support of a low-volatility anomaly: Optimizing buy-and-hold portfolios by minimizing historical aggregate volatility
    Maguire P.
    Kelly S.
    Miller R.
    Moser P.
    Hyland P.
    Maguire R.
    Journal of Asset Management, 2017, 18 (4) : 326 - 339