Exploring the impacts of ecosystem services on human well-being in Qinghai Province under the framework of the sustainable development goals

被引:20
|
作者
Li, Sihan [1 ]
Yu, Deyong [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Li, Xinyu [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol E, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Normal Univ, Key Lab Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Proc & Ecol C, Minist Educ, Xining 810016, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Acad Forestry & Landscape Architecture, Beijing Key Lab Ecol Funct Assessment & Regulat Te, Beijing 100102, Peoples R China
[4] 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[5] 7 Huajiadi South St, Beijing 100102, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem service; Human well-being; Landscape sustainability; Sustainable development goals; Qinghai province;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118880
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ESs) play vital roles in meeting the needs of human well-being and supporting sustainable development. However, there is limited research on how the types, amounts, interactions, and changes of the ESs collectively impact human well-being under the context of sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the United Nations. This study selected Qinghai Province of China as the study area and intended to make such an attempt to fill this gap in terms of the following aspects: (1) analyzing the spatial patterns and changing trends of ten ESs (food supply, water supply, carbon sink, soil retention, sand fixation, hydrological regulation, flood mitigation, cultural service,net primary productivity, and habitat quality) in Qinghai Province from 2000 to 2018; (2) constructing a multi-level index system of human well-being under the framework of the SDGs, and setting the criteria to assess the level of local human well-being; and (3) building a structural equation model to explore the direct and indirect impacts of the types, amounts, interactions and changes of the ESs on actual human well-being and the gaps between actual and targeted human well-being. The findings revealed that: (1) most of the ecosystem services fluctuated with significant downward or upward trends during 2000-2018, except for four ESs (i.e., carbon sink, soil retention, flood mitigation, and habitat quality); (2) only a few indicators of local residents' well-being such as meat production, milk production, the numbers of medical technical personnel in hospitals and health centers, and the numbers of scientific and technical personnel met the SDG criteria in most time, while other indicators remained at low levels and there were large gaps between them and the SDG criteria; (3) actual human well-being and the gaps between actual and targeted human well-being were affected by the types, amounts, interactions and changes of the ESs with different degrees directly or indirectly. The approaches and results in this study are instructive for other regions of the world to make certain the roles of ESs in promoting human well-being and substantiating the SDGs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influential paths of ecosystem services on human well-being in the context of the sustainable development goals
    Qiu, Jiaqi
    Yu, Deyong
    Huang, Ting
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 852
  • [2] Ecosystems and human well-being in the Sustainable Development Goals
    Wood, Sylvia L. R.
    DeClerck, Fabrice
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 13 (03) : 123 - 123
  • [3] Impact mechanism of ecosystem services on resident well-being under sustainable development goals: A case study of the Shanghai metropolitan area
    Yang, Lan
    Zhou, Xiaoping
    Gu, Xiaokun
    Liang, Ying
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 103
  • [4] Exploring the relationship between ecosystem services and sustainable development goals in Guangdong province, China
    Zhu, Linglong
    Wu, Zhuo
    Huang, Xiaocheng
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 169
  • [5] Ecosystem Services: The Key to Human Well-Being
    Paletto, Alessandro
    Favargiotti, Sara
    FORESTS, 2021, 12 (04):
  • [6] What are the impacts of sugarcane production on ecosystem services and human well-being? A review
    El Chami, Daniel
    Daccache, Andre
    El Moujabber, Maroun
    ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2020, 65 (02): : 188 - 199
  • [7] Linking human well-being and jellyfish: ecosystem services, impacts, and societal responses
    Graham, William M.
    Gelcich, Stefan
    Robinson, Kelly L.
    Duarte, Carlos M.
    Brotz, Lucas
    Purcell, Jennifer E.
    Madin, Laurence P.
    Mianzan, Hermes
    Sutherland, Kelly R.
    Uye, Shin-ichi
    Pitt, Kylie A.
    Lucas, Cathy H.
    Bogeberg, Molly
    Brodeur, Richard D.
    Condon, Rolert H.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 12 (09) : 515 - 523
  • [8] Healthy living, well-being and the sustainable development goals
    Mohammed, Amina J.
    Ghebreyesus, Tedros Adhanom
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2018, 96 (09) : 590 - +
  • [9] A framework linking ecosystem services and human well-being: Saltmarsh as a case study
    Rendon, Olivia R.
    Garbutt, Angus
    Skov, Martin
    Moller, Iris
    Alexander, Meghan
    Ballinger, Rhoda
    Wyles, Kayleigh
    Smith, Greg
    McKinley, Emma
    Griffin, John
    Thomas, Merryn
    Davidson, Kate
    Pages, Jordi F.
    Read, Simon
    Beaumont, Nicola
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2019, 1 (04) : 486 - 496
  • [10] The UN Sustainable Development Goals and the dynamics of well-being
    Costanza, Robert
    Fioramonti, Lorenzo
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (02) : 59 - 59