Belarusian Healthcare Professionals' Views on Monkeypox and Vaccine Hesitancy

被引:5
|
作者
Riad, Abanoub [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rybakova, Nadzeya [4 ]
Dubatouka, Nadzeya [4 ]
Zankevich, Ina [5 ]
Klugar, Miloslav [2 ,3 ]
Koscik, Michal [1 ]
Drobov, Anton [1 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol Physiol, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
[2] Inst Hlth Informat & Stat Czech Republ IHIS CR, Prague 12801, Czech Republic
[3] Masaryk Univ, Fac Med, Czech Natl Ctr Evidence Based Healthcare & Knowled, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
[4] Med Ctr Modern Pediat, Chervyakova Str 55, Minsk 220053, BELARUS
[5] Bausch Hlth LLC, Olshevskogo Str 22, Minsk 220073, BELARUS
关键词
cross-sectional studies; disease outbreaks; health belief model; health personnel; knowledge; monkeypox; Republic of Belarus; smallpox vaccine; vaccination hesitancy; KNOWLEDGE; WORKERS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines11081368
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Despite the low transmission risk of Monkeypox (mpox) in Belarus, this study is vital as it contributes to our understanding of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals (HCPs). It aims to assess vaccination perceptions and evaluate the willingness to pay for the vaccine among Belarusian HCPs, thereby enhancing pandemic preparedness. Methods: in October 2022, a cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted among Belarusian HCPs using a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ). Invitations were disseminated via social media platforms using a snowball sampling method. The SAQ encompassed various categories, including sociodemographic details, medical history, sources of mpox information, perceived and factual mpox knowledge, and perceptions of the mpox vaccine according to the health belief model (HBM), mpox vaccine acceptance and willingness to pay (WTP). Results: while a large proportion of respondents had good knowledge of mpox epidemiology and its clinical manifestations, their awareness of available vaccines and treatment options was limited. Consequently, a significant correlation was found between the history of influenza vaccination and mpox-related knowledge. Furthermore, the study showed that just over half of the participants (51.4%) were willing to receive the mpox vaccine if offered for free, safely, and effectively, with their decision largely influenced by perceived benefits (Spearman's rho = 0.451) and cues to action (Spearman's rho = 0.349). However, a considerable degree of hesitancy (30.6%) and resistance (18.1%) towards the mpox vaccine was observed, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to address these issues. Conclusions: this study highlights a significant knowledge gap among Belarusian HCPs about mpox vaccines and treatments, despite a general awareness of the disease's epidemiology and symptoms, and it underscores the need for targeted interventions to enhance mpox knowledge and vaccine acceptance.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monkeypox Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Workers in Pakistan
    Ali, Zahira
    Malik, Asmara
    Malik, Jahanzeb
    Fida, Tooba
    Ishaq, Uzma
    Ashraf, Amna
    Ahmed, Saqlain
    Karim, Ali
    Warayo, Allah
    Akhtar, Waheed
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INTERNAL MEDICINE PERSPECTIVES, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [2] The paradox of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals
    Karafillakis, E.
    Larson, H. J.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2018, 24 (08) : 799 - 800
  • [3] Vaccine hesitancy among primary healthcare professionals in Hungary
    Kun Eszter
    Benedek Angela
    Meszner Zsofia
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2019, 160 (48) : 1904 - 1914
  • [4] Vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals at a university hospital
    Fidelis, Renata Verissimo
    de Paula, Weslla Karla Albuquerque Silva
    Bezerra, Joana Lidyanne de Oliveira
    Coriolano-Marinus, Maria Wanderleya de Lavor
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2024, 37
  • [5] Healthcare Professionals' Discursive Constructions of Parental Vaccine Hesitancy: A Tale of Multiple Moralities
    Lermytte, Esther
    Bracke, Piet
    Ceuterick, Melissa
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2024, 34 (14) : 1384 - 1397
  • [6] Countering vaccine hesitancy: a systematic review of interventions to strengthen healthcare professionals' action
    Lo Moro, Giuseppina
    Ferrara, Maria
    Langiano, Elisa
    Accortanzo, Davide
    Cappelletti, Toni
    De Angelis, Aldo
    Esposito, Maurizio
    Prinzivalli, Alessandro
    Sannella, Alessandra
    Sbaragli, Sara
    Vuolanto, Pia
    Siliquini, Roberta
    De Vito, Elisabetta
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33 (05): : 905 - 915
  • [7] Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers
    Paterson, Pauline
    Meurice, Francois
    Stanberry, Lawrence R.
    Glismann, Steffen
    Rosenthal, Susan L.
    Larson, Heidi J.
    VACCINE, 2016, 34 (52) : 6700 - 6706
  • [8] Monkeypox: A Contemporary Review for Healthcare Professionals
    Titanji, Boghuma K.
    Tegomoh, Bryan
    Nematollahi, Saman
    Konomos, Michael
    Kulkarni, Prathit A.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 9 (07):
  • [9] Monkeypox Knowledge and Vaccine Hesitancy of Czech Healthcare Workers: A Health Belief Model (HBM)-Based Study
    Riad, Abanoub
    Drobov, Anton
    Rozmarinova, Jana
    Drapacova, Pavla
    Klugarova, Jitka
    Dusek, Ladislav
    Pokorna, Andrea
    Klugar, Miloslav
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [10] Addressing vaccine hesitancy in the training of healthcare professionals: Insights from the VAX-TRUST project
    Augusto, Fabio Rafael
    Guerreiro, Catia Sa
    Morais, Rita
    Mendonca, Joana
    Beja, Andre
    Correia, Tiago
    Hilario, Ana Patricia
    PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE, 2025, 9