Socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing practices and expenditure patterns: Results from a cross-sectional household survey in western Kenya

被引:1
|
作者
Were, Vincent [1 ]
Foley, Louise [2 ]
Musuva, Rosemary [1 ]
Pearce, Matthew [2 ]
Wadende, Pamela [3 ]
Lwanga, Charles [1 ]
Mogo, Ebele [2 ]
Turner-Moss, Eleanor [2 ]
Obonyo, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Kenya Govt Med Res Ctr, Ctr Global Hlth Res, Kisumu, Kenya
[2] Univ Cambridge Sch Clin Med, Med Res Council MRC Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge, England
[3] Kisii Univ, Sch Educ & Human Resource Dev, Kisii, Kenya
关键词
purchase; socioeconomic; inequalities; food; diet; consumption; expenditure; Kenya; MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES; DETERMINANTS; ASSOCIATION; HEALTH; DIET;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.943523
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionSocioeconomic inequalities contribute to poor health. Inequitable access to diverse and healthy foods can be a risk factor for non-communicable diseases, especially in individuals of low socioeconomic status. We examined the extent of socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing practices, expenditure, and consumption in a resource-poor setting in Kenya. MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of baseline cross-sectional data from a natural experimental study with a sample size of 512 individuals from 376 households in western Kenya. Data were collected on household food sources, expenditure and food consumption. Household socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed using the multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) model. Concentration indices (Ci) and multivariable linear regression models were used to establish socioeconomic inequalities. ResultsAbout half (47.9%) of individuals achieved a minimum level of dietary diversity with the majority coming from wealthier households. The two most consumed food groups were grains and roots (97.5%, n = 499) and dark green leafy vegetables (73.8%, n = 378), but these did not vary by SES. The consumption of dark green leafy vegetables was similar across wealth quantiles (Ci = 0.014, p = 0.314). Overall, the wealthier households spent significantly more money on food purchases with a median of USD 50 (IQR = 60) in a month compared to the poorest who spent a median of USD 40 (IQR = 40). Of all the sources of food, the highest amount was spent at open-air markets median of USD 20 (IQR = 30) and the expenditure did not vary significantly by SES (Ci = 0.4, p = 0.684). The higher the socioeconomic status the higher the total amount spent on food purchases. In multivariable regression analysis, household SES was a significant determinant of food expenditure [Adjusted coefficient = 6.09 (95%confidence interval CI = 2.19, 9.99)]. ConclusionWealthier households spent more money on food compared to the poorest households, especially on buying food at supermarkets. Individuals from the poorest households were dominant in eating grains and roots and less likely to consume a variety of food groups, including pulses, dairy, eggs and fruits, and vegetables. Individuals from the poorest households were also less likely to achieve adequate dietary diversity. Deliberate policies on diet and nutrition are required to address socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing practices.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urban-regional patterns of food purchasing behaviour: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015–2016 Australian Household Expenditure Survey
    Fiona Dangerfield
    Karen E. Lamb
    Laura H. Oostenbach
    Kylie Ball
    Lukar E. Thornton
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2021, 75 : 697 - 707
  • [2] Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of substances of abuse: results from a household cross-sectional survey in Murang’ a County, Kenya
    Were V.O.
    Okoyo C.O.
    Araka S.B.
    Kanyi H.M.
    Echoka E.E.
    Mwandawiro C.S.
    Njomo D.W.
    Discover Social Science and Health, 2 (1):
  • [3] Catastrophic household expenditure on health in Nepal: a cross-sectional survey
    Saito, Eiko
    Gilmour, Stuart
    Rahman, Md Mizanur
    Gautam, Ghan Shyam
    Shrestha, Pradeep Krishna
    Shibuya, Kenji
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2014, 92 (10) : 760 - 767
  • [4] Urban-regional patterns of food purchasing behaviour: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015-2016 Australian Household Expenditure Survey (vol 74, pg , 2020)
    Dangerfield, Fiona
    Lamb, Karen E.
    Oostenbach, Laura H.
    Ball, Kylie
    Thornton, Lukar E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2021, 75 (04) : 733 - 733
  • [5] Measuring and Explaining Socioeconomic Inequalities In Public Healthcare Utilization In Western Iran: Evidence from a Cross-sectional Survey
    Rezaeian, Shahab
    Hajizadeh, Mohammad
    Rezaei, Satar
    Ahmadi, Sina
    Karyani, Ali Kazemi
    Salimi, Yahya
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 18 (02)
  • [6] Socioeconomic inequalities in the delivery of brief interventions for smoking and excessive drinking: findings from a cross-sectional household survey in England
    Angus, Colin
    Brown, Jamie
    Beard, Emma
    Gillespie, Duncan
    Buykx, Penelope
    Kaner, Eileen F. S.
    Michie, Susan
    Meier, Petra
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (04):
  • [7] Socioeconomic determinants of household food security in the Red Sea state of Sudan: insights from a cross-sectional survey
    Fadol, Ahmed A. A.
    Tong, Guanggji
    Raza, Ali
    Mohamed, Wlaa
    GEOJOURNAL, 2024, 89 (02)
  • [8] Socioeconomic determinants of household food security in the Red Sea state of Sudan: insights from a cross-sectional survey
    Ahmed A. A. Fadol
    Guanggji Tong
    Ali Raza
    Wlaa Mohamed
    GeoJournal, 89
  • [9] The role of dwelling type on food expenditure: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015-2016 Australian Household Expenditure Survey
    Oostenbach, Laura H.
    Lamb, Karen E.
    Dangerfield, Fiona
    Poelman, Maartje P.
    Kremers, Stef
    Thornton, Lukar
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2021, 24 (08) : 2132 - 2143
  • [10] Trends in malaria prevalence and health related socioeconomic inequality in rural western Kenya: results from repeated household malaria cross-sectional surveys from 2006 to 2013
    Were, Vincent
    Buff, Ann M.
    Desai, Meghna
    Kariuki, Simon
    Samuels, A. M.
    Phillips-Howard, Penelope
    ter Kuile, Feiko O.
    Kachur, S. P.
    Niessen, Louis Wilhelmus
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09):