Predicting the Performance of Retail Market Firms: Regression and Machine Learning Methods

被引:4
|
作者
Vukovic, Darko B. [1 ,2 ]
Spitsina, Lubov [3 ]
Gribanova, Ekaterina [3 ]
Spitsin, Vladislav [4 ]
Lyzin, Ivan [5 ]
机构
[1] St Petersburg State Univ, Grad Sch Management, Volkhovskiy Pereulok 3, St Petersburg 199004, Russia
[2] Geog Inst Jovan Cvij SASA, Djure Jaks 9, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[3] Natl Res Tomsk Polytech Univ, Sch Engn Educ, Div Social Sci & Humanities, Lenina Ave 30, Tomsk 634050, Russia
[4] Natl Res Tomsk Polytech Univ, Sch Engn Entrepreneurship, Lenina Ave 30, Tomsk 634050, Russia
[5] Natl Res Tomsk Polytech Univ, Sch Informat Technol & Robot Engn, Lenina Ave, 30, Tomsk 634050, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
firm performance; non-linear models of panel data forecasting; retail market companies; profitability prediction; random effects regression; machine learning methods; Random Forest; long short-term memory; deep neural network; portfolio algorithm; ensemble algorithm; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; PROFITABILITY; GROWTH; MODELS; PROFITS;
D O I
10.3390/math11081916
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The problem of predicting profitability is exceptionally relevant for investors and company owners. This paper examines the factors affecting firm performance and tests and compares various methods based on linear and non-linear dependencies between variables for predicting firm performance. In this study, the methods include random effects regression, individual machine learning algorithms with optimizers (DNN, LSTM, and Random Forest), and advanced machine learning methods consisting of sets of algorithms (portfolios and ensembles). The training sample includes 551 retail-oriented companies and data for 2017-2019 (panel data, 1653 observations). The test sample contains data for these companies for 2020. This study combines two approaches (stages): an econometric analysis of the influence of factors on the company's profitability and machine learning methods to predict the company's profitability. To compare forecasting methods, we used parametric and non-parametric predictive measures and ANOVA. The paper shows that previous profitability has a strong positive impact on a firm's performance. We also find a non-linear positive effect of sales growth and web traffic on firm profitability. These variables significantly improve the prediction accuracy. Regression is inferior in forecast accuracy to machine learning methods. Advanced methods (portfolios and ensembles) demonstrate better and more steady results compared with individual machine learning methods.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of Machine Learning Compared With Regression Analysis in Predicting Albuminuria
    Arsiwala, Ali Haider
    Mathew, Marcella
    Scheppach, Johannes B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 33 (11): : 301 - 301
  • [2] Predicting Market Performance Using Machine and Deep Learning Techniques
    El Mahjouby, Mohamed
    Bennani, Mohamed Taj
    Lamrini, Mohamed
    Bossoufi, Badre
    Alghamdi, Thamer A. H.
    El Far, Mohamed
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 82033 - 82040
  • [3] Predicting Sales Prices of the Houses Using Regression Methods of Machine Learning
    Viktorovich, Parasich Andrey
    Aleksandrovich, Parasich Viktor
    Leopoldovich, Kaftannikov Igor
    Vasilevna, Parasich Irina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 3RD RUSSIAN-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS (RPC), 2018,
  • [4] Comparative analysis of regression and machine learning methods for predicting fault proneness models
    Singh, Yogesh
    Kaur, Arvinder
    Malhotra, Ruchika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 35 (2-4) : 183 - 193
  • [5] Predicting Performance of Solar updraught Tower using Machine Learning Regression Model
    Patil, Snehal
    Dhoble, Ashwin
    Sathe, Tushar
    Thawkar, Vivek
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 22 (05) : 825 - 843
  • [6] A machine learning based regression methods to predicting syngas composition for plasma gasification system
    Abdelrahim, Anass I. M.
    Yucel, Ozgun
    FUEL, 2025, 381
  • [7] Multicenter Comparison Of Conventional Regression And Machine Learning Methods For Predicting Clinical Deterioration On The Wards
    Churpek, M. M.
    Winslow, C. J.
    Meltzer, D. O.
    Kattan, M.
    Edelson, D. P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [8] Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards
    Churpek, Matthew M.
    Yuen, Trevor C.
    Winslow, Christopher
    Meltzer, David O.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Edelson, Dana P.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (02) : 368 - 374
  • [9] Predicting Spray Dried Dispersion Particle Size Via Machine Learning Regression Methods
    John M. Schmitt
    John M. Baumann
    Michael M. Morgen
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2022, 39 : 3223 - 3239
  • [10] Predicting Spray Dried Dispersion Particle Size Via Machine Learning Regression Methods
    Schmitt, John M.
    Baumann, John M.
    Morgen, Michael M.
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 39 (12) : 3223 - 3239