Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography reveals alterations in cortical excitability during pain

被引:4
|
作者
Chowdhury, Nahian Shahmat [1 ,2 ]
Chiang, Alan K., I [1 ,2 ]
Millard, Samantha K. [1 ,2 ]
Skippen, Patrick [1 ]
Chang, Wei-Ju [1 ,3 ]
Seminowicz, David A. [1 ,4 ]
Schabrun, Siobhan M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Neurosci Res Australia, Ctr Pain IMPACT, Sydney, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Coll Hlth Med & Wellbeing, Sch Hlth Sci, Callaghan, Australia
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Gray Ctr Mobil & Act, London, ON, Canada
来源
ELIFE | 2023年 / 12卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; electroencephalography; combined TMS-EEG; experimental pain; acute pain; Human; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; TMS-EEG; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; MUSCLE PAIN; CORTEX; BRAIN; INHIBITION; EIGENMODES; PARAMETERS; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.7554/eLife.88567
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to examine inhibitory and facilitatory circuits during experimental pain and in chronic pain populations. However, current applications of TMS to pain have been restricted to measurements of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from peripheral muscles. Here, TMS was combined with electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether experimental pain could induce alterations in cortical inhibitory/facilitatory activity observed in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). In Experiment 1 (n=29), multiple sustained thermal stimuli were administered to the forearm, with the first, second, and third block of thermal stimuli consisting of warm but non-painful (pre-pain block), painful (pain block) and warm but non-painful (post-pain block) temperatures, respectively. During each stimulus, TMS pulses were delivered while EEG (64 channels) was simultaneously recorded. Verbal pain ratings were collected between TMS pulses. Relative to pre-pain warm stimuli, painful stimuli led to an increase in the amplitude of the frontocentral negative peak similar to 45 ms post-TMS (N45), with a larger increase associated with higher pain ratings. Experiments 2 and 3 (n=10 in each) showed that the increase in the N45 in response to pain was not due to changes in sensory potentials associated with TMS, or a result of stronger reafferent muscle feedback during pain. This is the first study to use combined TMS-EEG to examine alterations in cortical excitability in response to pain. These results suggest that the N45 TEP peak, which indexes GABAergic neurotransmission, is implicated in pain perception and is a potential marker of individual differences in pain sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Cortical Excitability by Means of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography
    Silvia Casarotto
    Paola Canali
    Mario Rosanova
    Andrea Pigorini
    Matteo Fecchio
    Maurizio Mariotti
    Adelio Lucca
    Cristina Colombo
    Francesco Benedetti
    Marcello Massimini
    Brain Topography, 2013, 26 : 326 - 337
  • [2] Assessing the Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Cortical Excitability by Means of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography
    Casarotto, Silvia
    Canali, Paola
    Rosanova, Mario
    Pigorini, Andrea
    Fecchio, Matteo
    Mariotti, Maurizio
    Lucca, Adelio
    Colombo, Cristina
    Benedetti, Francesco
    Massimini, Marcello
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2013, 26 (02) : 326 - 337
  • [3] Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals altered cortical excitability in succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency
    Reis, Janine
    Cohen, L. G.
    Pearl, P. L.
    Gibson, K. M.
    Dustin, I.
    Theodore, W. H.
    EPILEPSIA, 2007, 48 : 258 - 258
  • [4] Motor cortical network excitability in Parkinson's disease: A transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography study
    Leodori, Giorgio
    De Bartolo, Maria Ilenia
    Guerra, Andrea
    Fabbrini, Andrea
    Belvisi, Daniele
    Paparella, Giulia
    Latorre, Anna
    Rocchi, Lorenzo
    Bhatia, Kailash
    Rothwell, John
    Conte, Antonella
    Berardelli, Alfredo
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 429
  • [5] Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of cortical excitability in depression
    Maeda, F
    Keenan, JP
    Freund, S
    Birnbaum, R
    Vaccaro, B
    Pascual-Leone, A
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 47 (08) : 169S - 170S
  • [6] PERAMPANEL AND CORTICAL EXCITABILITY: A TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION STUDY
    Stern, W. M.
    Sander, J. W.
    Rothwell, J. C.
    Sisodiya, S. M.
    EPILEPSIA, 2014, 55 : 52 - 52
  • [7] Cortical excitability and response variability of transcranial magnetic stimulation
    vanderKamp, W
    Zwinderman, AH
    Ferrari, MD
    vanDijk, JG
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 13 (02) : 164 - 171
  • [8] A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of cortical excitability in schizophrenia
    Fitzgerald, PB
    Brown, TL
    Daskalakis, ZJ
    Kulkarni, J
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2001, 49 (1-2) : 201 - 202
  • [9] Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study
    Strafella, AP
    Paus, T
    NEUROREPORT, 2000, 11 (10) : 2289 - 2292
  • [10] Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Pascual-Leone, A
    Tormos, JM
    Keenan, J
    Tarazona, F
    Cañete, C
    Catalá, MD
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (04) : 333 - 343