Population-Based Impact of Rurality and Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage on Pediatric Cancer Mortality in Washington State

被引:14
|
作者
Ohlsen, Timothy J. D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Doody, David R. [4 ]
Mueller, Beth A. [4 ,5 ]
Desai, Arti D. [2 ,3 ]
Chow, Eric J. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Ben Towne Ctr Childhood Canc Res, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Ctr Child Hlth Behav & Dev, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Fred Hutchinson Canc Ctr, Publ Hlth Sci Div, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Seattle Childrens Hosp, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
关键词
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; CHILDREN; SURVIVAL; URBAN; DISPARITIES; PERSPECTIVES; ADOLESCENTS; AREAS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0897
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Childhood cancer-related mortality differs by socioeconomic factors, but the impact of residential location, including rurality and neighborhood-level socioeconomic disad-vantage, is not well-characterized.Methods: This retrospective cohort study linked Washington State cancer registry data (1992-2013) to state birth (1974-2013) and death records (1992-2013) to identify residents <20 years diagnosed with cancer (n = 4,306). Census-based rural-urban commuting area codes and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) defined rural residence and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage at time of cancer diag-nosis, respectively. Neighborhoods in the highest state ADI quintile were classified as the most disadvantaged. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox hazards models, adjusted for key characteristics, were used to compare mortality by rural and ADI classification.Results: Five-year overall survival for children from non rural low ADI neighborhoods (referent) was 80.9%+/- 0.8%, versus 66.4%+/- 2.9% from non-rural high ADI neighborhoods, 69.4%+/- 3.8% from rural low ADI neighborhoods, and 66.9%+/- 3.8% from rural high ADI neighborhoods (P < 0.01 for each compar-ison versus referent). Compared with the referent group, children from comparator neighborhoods had a greater mortality risk: Rural low ADI [hazard ratio (HR), 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-2.02], rural high ADI (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16-2.01), and non-rural high ADI (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.32-2.04). Associa-tions of ADI and rurality with mortality varied in sub-analyses by cancer type.Conclusions: Children with cancer living in rural and/or socio-economically disadvantaged neighborhoods at diagnosis experi-enced greater mortality relative to those without either factor. Impact: Future investigation is needed to examine how rurality and poverty potentially impact healthcare utilization and health -related outcomes in pediatric oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Population-based impact of rurality and neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage on pediatric cancer mortality in Washington State.
    Ohlsen, Timothy James Daeeun
    Doody, David R.
    Desai, Arti D.
    Mueller, Beth A.
    Chow, Eric Jessen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [2] The effect of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on racial differences in ovarian cancer treatment in a population-based analysis in Chicago
    Joslin, Charlotte E.
    Brewer, Katherine C.
    Davis, Faith G.
    Hoskins, Kent
    Peterson, Caryn E.
    Pauls, Heather A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 135 (02) : 285 - 291
  • [3] Exploring the Neighborhood-Level Impact of Retail Marijuana Outlets on Crime in Washington State
    John Thacker
    Maggie Elliott Martin
    Yvonne Cristy
    Deirdre Rabideau
    Michael Shively
    Ryan Kling
    Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2023, 39 : 253 - 281
  • [4] Exploring the Neighborhood-Level Impact of Retail Marijuana Outlets on Crime in Washington State
    Thacker, John
    Martin, Maggie Elliott
    Cristy, Yvonne
    Rabideau, Deirdre
    Shively, Michael
    Kling, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2023, 39 (02) : 253 - 281
  • [5] Incidence of melanoma and its subtypes by neighborhood-level socioeconomic status: A United States population-based cohort analysis
    Hoang, M.
    Mirza, F. N.
    Weinstock, M. A.
    Qureshi, A. A.
    Cho, E.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 144 (08) : S91 - S91
  • [6] The Impact of Rurality and Disadvantage on the Diagnostic Interval for Breast Cancer in a Large Population-Based Study of 3202 Women in Queensland, Australia
    Youl, Philippa H.
    Aitken, Joanne F.
    Turrell, Gavin
    Chambers, Suzanne K.
    Dunn, Jeffrey
    Pyke, Christopher
    Baade, Peter D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (11):
  • [7] Associations of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Chronic Conditions by Age, Sex, Race, and Ethnicity in a Population-Based Cohort
    Chamberlain, Alanna M.
    St Sauver, Jennifer L.
    Rutten, Lila J. Finney
    Fan, Chun
    Jacobson, Debra J.
    Wilson, Patrick M.
    Boyd, Cynthia M.
    Rocca, Walter A.
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 97 (01) : 57 - 67
  • [8] Impact of parental socioeconomic factors on childhood cancer mortality: a population-based registry study
    Tolkkinen, Anniina
    Madanat-Harjuoja, Laura
    Taskinen, Mervi
    Rantanen, Matti
    Malila, Nea
    Pitkaniemi, Janne
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2018, 57 (11) : 1547 - 1555
  • [9] Negative impact of rurality on lung cancer survival in a population-based study
    Westeel, Virginie
    Pitard, Alexandre
    Martin, Mael
    Thaon, Isabelle
    Depierre, Alain
    Dalphin, Jean-Charles
    Arveux, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2 (07) : 613 - 618
  • [10] Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Determinants Impact Outcomes in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the Southeastern United States
    Erhunmwunsee, Loretta
    Joshi, Mary-Beth M.
    Conlon, Debbi H.
    Harpole, David H., Jr.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (20) : 5117 - 5123