Review of welding fume emission factor development

被引:3
|
作者
Quecke, Emily [1 ]
Quemerais, Bernadette [2 ,3 ]
Hashisho, Zaher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6R 2W2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB T6R 2R3, Canada
[3] 173B Heritage Med Res Ctr,11207-87 Ave NW E, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
关键词
emission factors; metalloids; metals; occupational health; welding fumes; STEEL; INHALATION; REDUCTION; FINE;
D O I
10.1093/annweh/wxad024
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The fumes created from welding activities present a unique occupational hazard. Due to the complex processes which govern fume formation, the characterization of welding fumes is difficult. Emission factors (EFs) are one method to characterize fume formation from different processes and scenarios. This paper reviews the development of EFs and similar metrics both historic research which contributed to the US EPAs AP-42 summary of welding emission factors released in 1995, and more recent research initiatives. Through a critical analysis of what research has been done in this area and the strength of the emission factors developed, this paper proposes a set of recommendations for future research. Research on emission factors for gas metal arc welding (GMAW) is the most complete amongst the different types of electric arc welding. Despite it being generally known that flux core arc welding (FCAW) creates significant fume emissions compared to some of the other processes few studies have looked at FCAW since the AP-42. Shielded metal arc welding is also under-researched particularly in terms of metal-specific emission factors. The influence of different welding activity parameters such as welding location, speed or current is well defined for GMAW but requires more attention for other welding processes. Further effort towards compiling and comparing available emission factor data of quality, evaluating the available data statistically and organizing this data in a practically useful way is required. The availability of reliable emission factors will allow the development or improvement of exposure modelling tools that would be very useful for exposure assessment when monitoring is not practical.s
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 693
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGICAL CONDITIONS ON THE EMISSION OF WELDING FUME DUE TO WELDING OF STAINLESS STEELS
    Matusiak, J.
    Wycislik, A.
    METALURGIJA, 2010, 49 (04): : 307 - 311
  • [2] Development and testing of a new sampler for welding fume
    Chung, KYK
    Aitken, RJ
    Bradley, DR
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1997, 41 (03): : 355 - 372
  • [3] Fume and gas emission during arc welding: Hazards and recommendation
    Popovic, Olivera
    Prokic-Cvetkovic, Radica
    Burzic, Men I.
    Lukic, Uros
    Bejic, Biljana
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 37 : 509 - 516
  • [4] Welding Fume Exposure and Epigenetic Alterations: A Systematic Review
    Leso, Veruscka
    Vetrani, Ilaria
    Della Volpe, Ilaria
    Nocera, Caterina
    Iavicoli, Ivo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (10)
  • [5] Development of a field method for measuring manganese in welding fume
    Marcy, A. Dale
    Drake, Pamela L.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2007, 9 (11): : 1199 - 1204
  • [6] Development of a lightweight fume hood for handheld welding guns
    Turkem, N
    Bilirgen, H
    Viecco, GA
    Caram, HS
    WELDING JOURNAL, 2005, 84 (02) : 31S - 36S
  • [7] Flux cored arc welding–determination and reduction of fume emission rates
    Hoefer, Kevin
    Kusch, Mario
    Welding International, 2021, 35 (4-6) : 138 - 144
  • [8] BARIUM IN WELDING FUME
    DARE, PRM
    HEWITT, PJ
    HICKS, R
    VANBEMST, A
    ZOBER, A
    FLEISCHER, M
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1984, 28 (04): : 445 - 448
  • [9] BARIUM IN WELDING FUME
    YEO, RBG
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1986, 30 (04): : 515 - 517
  • [10] BARIUM IN WELDING FUME
    MORETON, J
    JENKINS, N
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1985, 29 (03): : 443 - 444