Comparative study for global warming potentials of Chinese and Norwegian roads with life cycle assessment

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Fusong [1 ]
Li, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Wu, Shaopeng [2 ]
Zheng, Lifei [3 ]
Luo, Qiuyuan [4 ]
Zhang, Jixin [4 ]
Barbieri, Diego Maria [5 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil & Hydraul Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, State Key Lab Silicate Mat Architectures, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn Architecture & Environm, Wuhan 430068, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Prov Transportat Res Inst Co Ltd, Fuzhou 350004, Peoples R China
[5] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
基金
芬兰科学院; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Road construction; GHG emission; Life cycle assessment; Road structural design; Global warming controlling; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; RECLAIMED ASPHALT; EMISSIONS; MIXTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mitigation of GHG emission is increasing concerned in the research field of road engineering. The quantitative assessments of integral road structural designs in different countries would shed light on the implementation of sustainable road development and global warming controlling. The study referred to the European E6 and the Yanqing-Chongli expressway to quantify the GHG emissions for Norwegian and Chinese roads, and investigate the critical procedures and factors in resulting in the differences of GHG emissions. The data inventory and research framework for life cycle assessment (LCA) were established according to their applied materials, structural design and construction techniques. Moreover, the quantification of GHG emission was conducted as considering the surface layers, base layers, subbase and frost protection layer. The comparative results indicate that the Norwegian road generated extra 1.43 t equivalent CO2 more than Chinese road during the 20-year service life, and the surface layers are the most source of GHG emission in road structure, which occupied 65.75% for Chinese road and 43.19% for Norwegian road. Additionally, the materials extraction phase caused the largest proportion of GHG emission in Chinese road case, while the road construction phase was verified as the capital GHG contributor in Norwegian road case with 108.27 t equivalent CO2 emitted. The obtained results in the comparative study could provide the practical references for low-carbon road construction and promising strategies for globalization development.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1180
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative life cycle assessment of heavy-duty drivetrains: A Norwegian study case
    Booto, Gaylord Kabongo
    Espegren, Kari Aamodt
    Hancke, Ragnhild
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 95
  • [2] Alternative "Global Warming" Metrics in Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study with Existing Transportation Data
    Peters, Glen P.
    Aamaas, Borgar
    Lund, Marianne T.
    Solli, Christian
    Fuglestvedt, Jan S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (20) : 8633 - 8641
  • [3] Global warming potential of wheat production in Western Australia: a life cycle assessment
    Biswas, Wahidul K.
    Barton, Louise
    Carter, Daniel
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 22 (03) : 206 - 216
  • [4] Global warming impact of electricity generation from beef cattle manure: A life cycle assessment study
    Ghafoori, Emad
    Flynn, Peter C.
    Checkel, M. David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2006, 3 (03) : 257 - 270
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of Norwegian road tunnel
    Huang, Lizhen
    Bohne, Rolf Andre
    Bruland, Amund
    Jakobsen, Pal Drevland
    Lohne, Jardar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (02): : 174 - 184
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of Norwegian road tunnel
    Lizhen Huang
    Rolf André Bohne
    Amund Bruland
    Pål Drevland Jakobsen
    Jardar Lohne
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 174 - 184
  • [7] Global Warming and Toxicity Impacts: Peanuts in Georgia, USA Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Alhashim, Rahmah
    Anandhi, Aavudai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [8] Global warming implications of facade parameters: A life cycle assessment of residential buildings in Bahrain
    Radhi, Hassan
    Sharples, Stephen
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 : 99 - 108
  • [9] Characterization Factors for Global Warming in Life Cycle Assessment Based on Damages to Humans and Ecosystems
    De Schryver, An M.
    Brakkee, Karin W.
    Goedkoop, Mark J.
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (06) : 1689 - 1695
  • [10] Global warming potential of food waste through the life cycle assessment: An analytical review
    Amicarelli, Vera
    Lagioia, Giovanni
    Bux, Christian
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 91