Appropriateness of specialized care referrals for LBP: a cross-sectional analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Mathieu, Janny [1 ]
Robert, Marie-eve [2 ]
Chatillon, Claude-edouard [3 ,4 ]
Descarreaux, Martin [5 ]
Marchand, Andree-Anne [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Dept Anat, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Ctr integre Univ Sante & Serv Sociaux, Mauricie & du Ctr du Quebec, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Div Neurosurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Dept Human Kinet, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Dept Chiropract, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
关键词
low back pain; referral appropriateness; specialized services; wait time; cross-sectional study; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINE SURGERY REFERRALS; HEALTH-CARE; CLINICAL-COURSE; WAITING-LISTS; DISEASE; ONTARIO; CANADA; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2023.1292481
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) accounts for a significant proportion of primary care visits. Despite the development of evidence-based guidelines, studies point to the inefficient use of healthcare resources, resulting in over 60.0% of patients with LBP being referred to spine surgeons without any surgical indication. Centralized waiting lists (CWLs) have been implemented to improve access to specialized care by managing asymmetry between supply and demands. To date, no study has provided data on patients' clinical profiles and referral patterns to medical specialists for LBP in the context of a publicly funded healthcare system operating a prioritization model. The objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of specialized care referrals for LBP after the implementation of a CWL.MethodsA retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 500 randomly selected electronic health records of patients who attended the outpatient neurosurgery clinic of the administrative Mauricie-et-Centre-du-Quebec region was performed. Inclusion criteria were neurosurgery consultation referrals for adults >= 18 years suffering from a primary complaint of LBP, and performed between September 1st, 2018, and September 1st, 2021. Data relevant for drawing a comprehensive portrait of patients referred to the neurosurgery service and for judging referrals appropriateness were manually extracted.ResultsOf the 500 cases analyzed, only 112 (22.4%) were surgical candidates, while 221 (44.2%) were discharge from the neurosurgery service upon initial assessment. Key information was inconsistently documented in medical files, thus preventing the establishment of a comprehensive portrait of patients referred to the neurosurgery service for LBP. Nevertheless, over 80.0% of referrals made during the study period were deemed inappropriate. Inappropriate referrals were characterized by higher proportion of patients symptomatically improved, presenting a back-dominant chief complaint, exhibiting no objective neurological symptoms, and diagnosed with non-specific LBP.ConclusionThis study reveals a significant proportion of inappropriate referrals to specialized care for LBP. Further research is needed to better understand the factors that prompt referrals to medical specialists for LBP, and the criteria considered by neurosurgeons when selecting the appropriate management strategy. Recent studies suggest that triaging approaches led by musculoskeletal experts may improve referral appropriateness to specialized care.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sedation in specialized palliative care: A cross-sectional study
    Hedman, Christel
    Rosso, Aldana
    Haggstrom, Ola
    Norden, Charlotte
    Furst, Carl Johan
    Schelin, Maria E. C.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [2] Sedation in specialized palliative care: A cross-sectional study
    Hedman, Christel
    Rosso, Aldana
    Haggstrom, Ola
    Norden, Charlotte
    Furst, Carl Johan
    Schelin, Maria E. C.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (07):
  • [3] Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study
    Weckbecker, Klaus
    Puth, Marie-Therese
    Just, Johannes Maximilian
    Horn, Kirsten
    Grabenhorst, Ulrich
    Porz, Johannes
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2021, 83 (12) : 993 - 997
  • [4] Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in a primary care area: A cross-sectional study
    Fernandez-Urrusuno, Rocio
    Flores-Dorado, Macarena
    Vilches-Arenas, Angel
    Serrano-Martino, Carmen
    Corral-Baena, Susana
    Carmen Montero-Balosa, M.
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2014, 32 (05): : 285 - 292
  • [5] Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Sinusitis in Primary Care: A Cross-sectional Study
    Truitt, Katie N.
    Brown, Tiffany
    Lee, Ji Young
    Linder, Jeffrey A.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 72 (02) : 311 - 314
  • [6] End-of-life decisions and appropriateness of care in intensive care: a cross-sectional, pilot study
    Cescon, F.
    Monaco, E.
    Gregori, D.
    Martinato, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30 : V20 - V20
  • [7] Support for Family Caregivers in Specialized Palliative Care: A Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Vermogen, Maarten
    De Vleminck, Aline
    Leemans, Kathleen
    Van den Block, Lieve
    Van Audenhove, Chantal
    Deliens, Luc
    Cohen, Joachim
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 56 (06) : E92 - E93
  • [8] Integrality, absenteeism and resolubility of specialized care for pediatric patients: a cross-sectional study
    Gouvea, Daiana Back
    Neves, Matheus
    Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2023, 37
  • [9] Burdens and Resources of Staff of a Specialized Ward for Neuropalliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey
    Herwest, Sarah
    Kuhlmann, Stella Linnea
    Willert, Anna-Christin
    Ploner, Christoph Johannes
    Kowski, Alexander Bernhard
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [10] Quality of referrals to specialist palliative care and remote patient triage — a cross-sectional study
    Tomasz Grądalski
    Krystyna Kochan
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31