Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After Aortic Valve Replacement: Differences Between Biological and Mechanical Prostheses

被引:0
|
作者
Timmermans, Naomi [1 ]
Lam, Ka Yan [1 ]
van Straten, Albert [1 ]
van't Veer, Marcel [2 ]
Soliman-Hamad, Mohamed [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Heart Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Catharina Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Michelangelolaan 2,POB 1350, NL-5602 ZA Eindhoven, Netherlands
来源
HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION | 2024年 / 33卷 / 01期
关键词
Aortic valve replacement; Prosthetic valve endocarditis; Re-intervention; SURGERY; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOMES; SOCIETY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2023.11.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is the most severe form of infective endocarditis associated with a high mortality rate. Whether PVE affects biological and mechanical aortic valves to the same extent remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of re-intervention because of PVE between bioprosthetic and mechanical valves. Methods Patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or combined AVR in a single cardiac surgery centre between January 1998 and December 2019 were analysed. All patients who underwent re-intervention because of PVE were identified. The primary endpoint was the rate of explants. Freedom from re-intervention and variables associated with re-intervention were analysed using Cox regression analysis including correction for competing risk. Results During the study period, 5,983 aortic valve prostheses were implanted, including 3,620 biological (60.5%) and 2,363 mechanical (39.5%) prostheses. The overall mean follow-up period was 7.365.3 years (median, 6.5; IQR 2.9-11.2 years). The rate of re-intervention for PVE in the biological group was 1.5% (n=54) compared with 1.7% (n=40) in the mechanical group (p=0.541). Cox regression analysis revealed that younger age (HR 0.960, 95% CI 0.942-0.979; p,0.001), male sex (HR 2.362, 95% CI 1.384-4.033; p=0.002), higher creatinine (HR 1.002, 95% CI 0.999-1.004; p=0.057), and biological valve prosthesis (HR 2.073, 95% CI 1.258-3.414; p=0.004) were associated with re-intervention for PVE. After correction for competing risk of death, biological valve prosthesis was significantly associated with a higher rate of reintervention for PVE (HR 2.011, 95% CI 1.177-3.437; p=0.011). Conclusions According to this single -centre, observational, retrospective cohort study, AVR using biological prosthesis is associated with re-intervention for PVE compared to mechanical prosthesis. Further investigations are needed to verify these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 137
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Glaser, Natalie
    Jackson, Veronica
    Holzmann, Martin J.
    Franco-Cereceda, Anders
    Sartipy, Ulrik
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136 (03) : 329 - 331
  • [2] Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Fukuhara, Shinichi
    Wu, Xiaoting
    Hawkins, Robert
    Ailawadi, Gorav
    Deeb, Michael
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 116 (02): : 314 - 321
  • [3] Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Treat Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After Valve-in- Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Jena, Nihar
    Patel, Kinjal
    Desai, Ronak
    Siddiqui, Nazia
    Ahluwalia, Guneet
    Halabi, Abdul R.
    Schwartz, Charles
    Krishnan, Sandeep
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [4] Biological versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement
    Rodriguez-Caulo, Emiliano A.
    Blanco-Herrera, Oscar R.
    Berastegui, Elisabet
    Arias-Dachary, Javier
    Souaf-Khalafi, Souhayla
    Parody-Cuerda, Gertrudis
    Laguna, Gregorio
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 165 (02): : 609 - +
  • [5] Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis with Valvular Obstruction after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Pabilona, Christine
    Gitler, Bernard
    Lederman, Jeffrey A.
    Miller, Donald
    Keltz, Theodore N.
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2014, 42 (02) : 172 - 174
  • [6] AN ENIGMATIC DIAGNOSIS: PROSTHETIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
    Davis, John
    Staloch, Dustin
    Levit, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 1262 - 1262
  • [7] Utilizing a sutureless valve for prosthetic valve endocarditis after aortic root replacement
    Hayatsu, Yukihiro
    Naganuma, Masaaki
    Nomura, Hayate
    Yamaya, Kazuhiro
    Hata, Masaki
    SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [8] PROSTHETIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS AFTER TAVI REQUIRING SURGICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT AND ASCENDING REPLACEMENT
    Kameda, Yuika
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 2698 - 2698
  • [9] Mycobacterium chimaera After Aortic Valve Replacement Causing Aortic Rupture and Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis
    Shan, Shubham David
    Bozso, Sabin Joseph
    Akioyamen, Leo
    MacArthur, Roderick
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 111 (05): : E335 - E337
  • [10] Incidence and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands
    Brouwer, J.
    van den Brink, F. S.
    Nijenhuis, V. J.
    Vossenberg, T. N.
    Delewi, R.
    van Mourik, M. S.
    den Heijer, P.
    Tanis, W.
    Kievit, P. C.
    Holvoet, W.
    Hermanides, R. S.
    ten Berg, J. M.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 28 (10) : 520 - 525