Why it is good to communicate the bad: understanding the influence of message framing in persuasive communication on consumer decision-making processes

被引:2
|
作者
Gier, Nadine R. [1 ]
Krampe, Caspar [1 ,2 ]
Kenning, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Business Adm & Econ, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
关键词
message framing; decision-making; fMRI; consumer neuroscience; brain network perspective; persuasive communication; sustainable marketing; reflective-impulsive model; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; IMPULSIVE DETERMINANTS; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; REVERSE INFERENCE; PARIETAL LOBE; NEUROSCIENCE; INTEGRATION; BEHAVIOR; EMOTION; MEMORY;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2023.1085810
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
IntroductionOne approach to bridging the gap between consumer intentions and behavior is persuasive communication to reinforce their intentions and thereby support their behavior change. Message framing has proven to be a useful, persuasive communication tool. However, message framing is considered more complicated than other types of framing because, in addition to concept-specific elements, it is also strongly influenced by and, in turn, influences emotions. Therefore, it is almost impossible for consumers to verbally express their attitudes, so the challenge is to explain and measure its impact. This research aims to help in this regard by suggesting a theoretical model to understand how message framing is processed from a consumer neuroscience perspective. More precisely, the factors that constitute message framing are systematized and built on a reflective-impulsive model and a neural emotion-cognition framework interpreted to explain the persuasive effects of message framing.MethodA functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment is used to examine the effects of message framing for four different frame types that are hypothesized to affect consumer information processing differently.ResultThe results suggest that communication strategies should take into account the valence of the objects and the frame used. The behavioral results partially confirm the assumption that two types of information processing could take place, as suggested by the reflective-impulsive model. At the neural level, using the network perspective, the results show that certain brain regions primarily associated with emotional and cognitive interaction processes are active during processing, depending on the framing of the message.DiscussionIn cases of indirect avoidance value-consistent framing, it may be good to communicate the bad in the appropriate frame to influence information processing.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 7 条