Human Factor Interrelationships to Improve Worker Reliability: Implementation of MCDM in the Agri-Food Sector

被引:3
|
作者
La Fata, Concetta Manuela [1 ]
Giallanza, Antonio [1 ]
Adelfio, Luca [1 ]
Micale, Rosa [2 ]
La Scalia, Giada [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Dept Engn, Viale Sci Bld 8, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
[2] Univ Messina, Dept Engn, Contrada Dio, I-98166 Messina, Italy
关键词
Human Error Probability (HEP); Performance Shaping Factor (PSF); interdependence; Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM); PERFORMANCE SHAPING FACTORS; HRA;
D O I
10.3390/electronics12020283
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Performance Shaping Factors (PSFs) are contextual, individual, and cognitive factors used in Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) to quantify the worker contribution to errors when performing a generic task. Although the empirical evidence demonstrates the existence of PSF interrelationships, the majority of HRA methods assume their independence. As a consequence, the resulting Human Error Probability (HEP) might be over- or underestimated. To deal with this issue, only a few qualitative guidelines or statistical-based approaches have been proposed so far. While the former are not well structured, the latter require a high computational effort and a proper number of input data. Therefore, the present paper provides an alternative approach to deal with the PSFs interaction issue to facilitate the identification of the most influential human factors on which to take corrective actions. To this purpose, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods may represent a structured, effortless, and easily replicable framework. Owing to their ability to deal with the interdependence of decision factors, DEMATEL and ANP are hence considered and afterwards compared, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. Both methods are implemented in an agri-food company which produces pistachios in Southern Italy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nanotechnology in Agri-Food Sector
    Kumari, Avnesh
    Yadav, Sudesh Kumar
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2014, 54 (08) : 975 - 984
  • [2] Brexit and the Agri-food Sector
    Davis, John
    EUROCHOICES, 2016, 15 (02) : 3 - +
  • [3] AGRI-FOOD SECTOR IN SERBIA
    Zaric, Vlade
    EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2014, 61 (01): : 245 - 247
  • [4] MULTIFUNCTIONALITY OF AGRI-FOOD SECTOR: THEORETIC CONSEPTION, PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION
    Nikolaevna, Krylatykh Elmira
    EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2011, 4 : 29 - +
  • [5] MULTIFUNCTIONALITY OF AGRI-FOOD SECTOR: THEORETIC CONCEPTION, PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION
    Krylatukh, E. N.
    EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2009, 1 : 42 - +
  • [6] Risk Management in the Agri-food Sector
    Bachev, Hrabrin
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS, 2013, 7 (01) : 45 - 62
  • [7] Application of RFID in agri-food sector
    Kumari, Leena
    Narsaiah, K.
    Grewal, M. K.
    Anurag, R. K.
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 43 (02) : 144 - 161
  • [8] Traceability Technologies in the Agri-food Sector
    Tudora, Eleonora
    Tirziu, Eugenia
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATIC CONTROL-REVISTA ROMANA DE INFORMATICA SI AUTOMATICA, 2019, 29 (02): : 101 - 112
  • [9] Industrialization in the agri-food sector and globalization
    Rehber, E
    AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2004, 15 (03): : 46 - 50
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence: Implications for the Agri-Food Sector
    Taneja, Akriti
    Nair, Gayathri
    Joshi, Manisha
    Sharma, Somesh
    Sharma, Surabhi
    Jambrak, Anet Rezek
    Rosello-Soto, Elena
    Barba, Francisco J.
    Castagnini, Juan M.
    Leksawasdi, Noppol
    Phimolsiripol, Yuthana
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (05):