Can NIRS be a surrogate indicator of elective shunt in carotid endarterectomy? A single-center observational retrospective study says no

被引:1
|
作者
Plata-Bello, Julio [1 ]
Perez-Lorensu, Pedro Javier [2 ]
Saponaro-Gonzalez, Angel [2 ]
Darias-Delbey, Beneharo [3 ,4 ]
Farina-Jeronimo, Helga [1 ]
Dominguez-Lorenzo, Jose Maria [2 ]
Ucelay-Gomez, Roberto [3 ]
Gonzalez-Tabares, Enrique Francisco [3 ]
Ibrahim-Achi, Zena [3 ]
Guerrero-Ramirez, Christian Salvador [3 ]
Padron-Encalada, Carol Elizabeth [3 ]
Perez-Burkhardt, Jose Luis [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Canarias, Dept Neurosurg, Carretera Ofra S-N Cuesta,S-C De Tenerife, Santa Cruz De Tenerife 38320, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Canarias, Dept Neurol, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Canarias, Dept Gastroenterol, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Canarias, Dept Vasc Surg, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
关键词
Carotid endarterectomy; Intraoperative neuromonitoring; Near infrared spectroscopy; Brain ischemia; NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS; EEG CHANGES; PERIOPERATIVE STROKE; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CEREBRAL OXIMETRY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ISCHEMIA; ARTERY; CORRELATE;
D O I
10.1007/s10877-023-01114-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundNeuromonitoring during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under general anesthesia is desirable and may be useful for preventing brain ischemia, but the selection of the most appropriate method remains controversial.PurposeTo determine the effectiveness of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) compared to multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in indicating elective shunts and predicting postoperative neurological status.MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study including 86 consecutive patients with CEA under general anesthesia. NIRS and multimodality IONM were performed during the procedure. IONM included electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated for each neuromonitoring modality.ResultsNIRS presented a sensitivity and a specificity for detecting brain ischemia of 77.7% and 89.6%, respectively (PPV = 46.6% and NPV = 97.2%). In contrast, a 100% sensitivity and specificity for multimodality IONM was determined (PPV and NPV = 100%). No significant difference (in demographical or clinical data) between "true positive" and "false-positive" patients was identified.Among the methods included in multimodality IONM, EEG showed the best results for predicting postoperative outcome after CEA (PPV and NPV=100%).ResultsNIRS presented a sensitivity and a specificity for detecting brain ischemia of 77.7% and 89.6%, respectively (PPV = 46.6% and NPV = 97.2%). In contrast, a 100% sensitivity and specificity for multimodality IONM was determined (PPV and NPV = 100%). No significant difference (in demographical or clinical data) between "true positive" and "false-positive" patients was identified.Among the methods included in multimodality IONM, EEG showed the best results for predicting postoperative outcome after CEA (PPV and NPV=100%).ConclusionNIRS is inferior to multimodality IONM in detecting brain ischemia and predicting postoperative neurological status during CEA under general anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 638
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison Between Conventional and Patch Carotid Endarterectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Wu, Sensen
    Wang, Hui
    Guo, Julong
    Zhang, Fan
    Pan, Dikang
    Ning, Yachan
    Gu, Yongquan
    Guo, Lianrui
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 184 : E340 - E345
  • [2] Comparing carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: retrospective single-center analysis
    Cho, Jeong Su
    Song, Seunghwan
    Huh, Up
    Lee, Chung Won
    Lee, Jae Il
    Ko, Jun Kyeung
    Lee, Tea Hong
    Hwangbo, Lee
    Sung, Sang Min
    Cho, Han Jin
    Kim, Gwon-Min
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, : 3409 - 3416
  • [3] Comparative on the effectiveness and safety of different carotid endarterectomy techniques: a single-center Retrospective Study
    Wu, Sensen
    Wang, Hui
    Guo, Julong
    Zhang, Fan
    Pan, Dikang
    Ning, Yachan
    Gu, Yongquan
    Guo, Lianrui
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [4] Internal carotid artery stenosis - angioplasty with stenting or endarterectomy? A restrospective, single-center, observational study
    Woronowicz, Konrad
    Krasinski, Zbigniew
    Lukawiecki, Sebastian K.
    Gotlibowski, Wojciech J.
    Aboul-Hassan, Sleiman Sebastian
    POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 96 (06) : 63 - 69
  • [5] Effects of patient age on outcomes after carotid endarterectomy A retrospective, single-center study in Korea
    Jeong, Min-Jae
    Kwon, Sun U.
    Kim, Min-Ju
    Han, Youngjin
    Kwon, Tae-Won
    Cho, Yong-Pil
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (32)
  • [6] The Efficacy of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study
    Wang, Yu
    Li, Li
    Wang, Tianlong
    Zhao, Lei
    Feng, Hua
    Wang, Qian
    Fan, Long
    Feng, Xuexin
    Xiao, Wei
    Feng, Kunpeng
    CELL TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 28 (02) : 170 - 175
  • [7] Effects of Sarpogrelate Combined with Aspirin in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy in China: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Guo, Jianming
    Gu, Yongquan
    Guo, Lianrui
    Yu, Hengxi
    Qi, Lixing
    Tong, Zhu
    Zhang, Jian
    Wang, Zhonghao
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 35 : 183 - 188
  • [8] Letter to the Editor Regarding: "Comparison Between Conventional and Patch Carotid Endarterectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study"
    Asif, Rehman
    Iqbal, Umer
    Tariq, Maryam
    Kumar, Aashish
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 189 : 502 - 502
  • [9] Fetal ciliopathies: a retrospective observational single-center study
    Corinna Simonini
    Anne Floeck
    Brigitte Strizek
    Andreas Mueller
    Ulrich Gembruch
    Annegret Geipel
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 71 - 83
  • [10] Fetal ciliopathies: a retrospective observational single-center study
    Simonini, Corinna
    Floeck, Anne
    Strizek, Brigitte
    Mueller, Andreas
    Gembruch, Ulrich
    Geipel, Annegret
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (01) : 71 - 83