MRI-based analysis of different clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate of prostate imaging reporting and data system score 4 in the peripheral zone

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Zhoujie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, He [4 ]
Fu, Weixiao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Sainan [5 ]
Song, Gang [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Urol, 8 Xishiku St Xicheng Dist, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Inst Urol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Urol Canc Ctr China, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Stat, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Urol,Natl Canc Ctr, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; Prostate imaging reporting and data system; Dynamic contrast-enhanced; Targeted biopsy;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-022-03712-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rate between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) 4 and DWI 3 with positive dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) (hereinafter called 'DWI 3/DCE+') lesions in the peripheral zone (PZ) and to explore the diagnostic performance of targeted biopsy (TB) or systematic biopsy (SB) in patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 lesions. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 206 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and had at least one PI-RADS 4 lesion in the PZ. All patients subsequently underwent combined magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided TB and ultrasound-guided 12-core SB. The chi-square test was used to compare the csPCa detection rates between DWI 4 and DWI 3/DCE+ lesions. Based on the TB + SB results as a standard reference, we analyzed the sensitivity, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of TB alone or SB alone. Results Patients with DWI 4 lesions had higher csPCa detection rate than those with DWI 3/DCE + lesions when using TB + SB, TB, and SB, and the differences were significant for TB + SB (72.22 vs. 54.84%, p = 0.015) or SB (65.97 vs. 46.77%, p = 0.010). For DWI 3/DCE+ patients whose prostate-specific antigen levels ranged from 4 to 10 ng/mL, TB alone showed the highest negative predictive value (95% Cl 78.12-100). Conclusions DWI 4 tends to have worse results than DWI 3/DCE+. TB has great diagnostic performances in DWI 3/DCE+ patients, especially for those prostate-specific antigen ranging from 4 to 10 ng/mL. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 398
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MRI-based analysis of different clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate of prostate imaging reporting and data system score 4 in the peripheral zone
    Zhoujie Sun
    He Wang
    Weixiao Fu
    Sainan Zhu
    Gang Song
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 390 - 398
  • [2] CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATE OF PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM SCORE 4 IN THE PERIPHERAL ZONE
    Song, Gang
    Sun, Zhoujie
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E897 - E897
  • [3] A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer
    Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Ratnani, Parita
    Young, James
    Lantz, Anna
    Parekh, Sneha
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    Li, Li
    Lewis, Sara
    Haines, Kenneth, III
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Wiklund, Peter
    Tewari, Ash
    CANCER REPORTS, 2021, 4 (04)
  • [4] The impact of integrating PRIMARY score or SUVmax with MRI-based risk models for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Guo, Shikuan
    Ren, Jing
    Meng, Qingze
    Zhang, Boyuan
    Jiao, Jianhua
    Han, Donghui
    Wu, Peng
    Ma, Shuaijun
    Zhang, Jing
    Xing, Nianzeng
    Qin, Weijun
    Kang, Fei
    Zhang, Jingliang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2025, 52 (02) : 756 - 765
  • [5] Comparison of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient parameters with prostate imaging reporting and data system V2 assessment for detection of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer
    Elmira Hassanzadeh
    Francesco Alessandrino
    Olutayo I. Olubiyi
    Daniel I. Glazer
    Robert V. Mulkern
    Andriy Fedorov
    Clare M. Tempany
    Fiona M. Fennessy
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 1237 - 1244
  • [6] Comparison of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient parameters with prostate imaging reporting and data system V2 assessment for detection of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer
    Hassanzadeh, Elmira
    Alessandrino, Francesco
    Olubiyi, Olutayo I.
    Glazer, Daniel I.
    Mulkern, Robert V.
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (05) : 1237 - 1244
  • [7] Impact of a Structured Reporting Template on Adherence to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 and on the Diagnostic Performance of Prostate MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Shaish, Hiram
    Feltus, Whitney
    Steinman, Jonathan
    Hecht, Elizabeth
    Wenske, Sven
    Ahmed, Firas
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (05) : 749 - 754
  • [8] Association Between Tumor Multifocality on Multi-parametric MRI and Detection of Clinically-Significant Prostate Cancer in Lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score 4
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Swallow, Matthew
    Sherrer, Rachael L.
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Khajir, Ghazal
    Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 134 : 173 - 180
  • [9] Combining prostate-specific antigen density with prostate imaging reporting and data system score version 2.1 to improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: A retrospective study
    Lei, Yin
    Li, Tian Jie
    Gu, Peng
    Yang, Yu Kun
    Zhao, Lei
    Gao, Chao
    Hu, Juan
    Liu, Xiao Dong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [10] Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Sheridan, Alison D.
    Nath, Sameer K.
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Aneja, Sanjay
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Spektor, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (02) : 347 - 357