Evaluating ChatGPT as an adjunct for the multidisciplinary tumor board decision-making in primary breast cancer cases

被引:48
|
作者
Lukac, Stefan [1 ]
Dayan, Davut [1 ]
Fink, Visnja [1 ]
Leinert, Elena [1 ]
Hartkopf, Andreas [1 ]
Veselinovic, Kristina [1 ]
Janni, Wolfgang [1 ]
Rack, Brigitte [1 ]
Pfister, Kerstin [1 ]
Heitmeir, Benedikt [1 ]
Ebner, Florian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ulm, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Prittwitzstr 43, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[2] Gynakol Gemeinschaftspraxis Freising & Moosburg, Munich, Germany
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Breast cancer; Multidisciplinary tumor board; ChatGPT; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; AGREEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-023-07130-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundAs the available information about breast cancer is growing every day, the decision-making process for the therapy is getting more complex. ChatGPT as a transformer-based language model possesses the ability to write scientific articles and pass medical exams. But is it able to support the multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) in the planning of the therapy of patients with breast cancer?Material and MethodsWe performed a pilot study on 10 consecutive cases of breast cancer patients discussed in MDT at our department in January 2023. Included were patients with a primary diagnosis of early breast cancer. The recommendation of MDT was compared with the recommendation of the ChatGPT for particular patients and the clinical score of the agreement was calculated.ResultsResults showed that ChatGPT provided mostly general answers regarding chemotherapy, breast surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and antibody therapy. It was able to identify risk factors for hereditary breast cancer and point out the elderly patient indicated for chemotherapy to evaluate the cost/benefit effect. ChatGPT wrongly identified the patient with Her2 1 + and 2 + (FISH negative) as in need of therapy with an antibody and called endocrine therapy "hormonal treatment".ConclusionsSupport of artificial intelligence by finding individualized and personalized therapy for our patients in the time of rapidly expanding amount of information is looking for the ways in the clinical routine. ChatGPT has the potential to find its spot in clinical medicine, but the current version is not able to provide specific recommendations for the therapy of patients with primary breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1831 / 1844
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating ChatGPT as an adjunct for the multidisciplinary tumor board decision-making in primary breast cancer cases
    Stefan Lukac
    Davut Dayan
    Visnja Fink
    Elena Leinert
    Andreas Hartkopf
    Kristina Veselinovic
    Wolfgang Janni
    Brigitte Rack
    Kerstin Pfister
    Benedikt Heitmeir
    Florian Ebner
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 308 : 1831 - 1844
  • [2] Decision-making concordance: A comparative analysis between a multidisciplinary tumor board and a large language model (ChatGPT) in breast cancer management
    Torres-Cisneros, Eduardo Rey
    Canavati-Marcos, Mauricio
    Tamez-Salazar, Jaime
    Magallanes-Garza, Gerardo Israel
    Guzman-Huerta, Eduardo A.
    Mireles-Aguilar, Teresa
    Gomez-Macias, Gabriela Sofia
    Perez-Ramos, Erik
    de la Pena-Hinojosa, Cuauhtemoc
    Garza Montemayor, Margarita Lilia
    Garza-Garcia, Nancy Lorena
    Aguilar y Mendez, Dione
    Olivares-Antunez, Yazmin
    Vazquez-Avila, Jose Raul
    Vazquez Juarez, Daniela
    Diaz-Perez, Hector Marcelino
    Rodriguez Gomez, David Omar Omar
    Palacios-Trevino, Emmeline Rochelle
    Bruni-Guerrero, Carla Renata
    Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [3] Assessing the role of advanced artificial intelligence as a tool in multidisciplinary tumor board decision-making for primary head and neck cancer cases
    Schmidl, Benedikt
    Huetten, Tobias
    Pigorsch, Steffi
    Stoegbauer, Fabian
    Hoch, Cosima C.
    Hussain, Timon
    Wollenberg, Barbara
    Wirth, Markus
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [4] Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Breast Cancer Care - An Observational Study
    Schellenberger, Barbara
    Diekmann, Annika
    Heuser, Christian
    Gambashidze, Nikoloz
    Ernstnnann, Nicole
    Ansmann, Lena
    JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2021, 14 : 1275 - 1284
  • [5] Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT at Breast Tumor Board
    Xu, Y.
    Logie, N.
    Phan, T.
    Barbera, L.
    Nordal, R. A.
    Stosky, J. M.
    Lee, S. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E493 - E493
  • [6] Artificial intelligence-based decision-making: can ChatGPT replace a multidisciplinary tumour board?
    Ulloa, Javier Vela
    Valenzuela, Sebastian King
    Altamirano, Christophe Riquoir
    Schmied, Gonzalo Urrejola
    BJS-BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110 (11): : 1543 - 1544
  • [7] Challenging ChatGPT 3.5 in Senology-An Assessment of Concordance with Breast Cancer Tumor Board Decision Making
    Griewing, Sebastian
    Gremke, Niklas
    Wagner, Uwe
    Lingenfelder, Michael
    Kuhn, Sebastian
    Boekhoff, Jelena
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [8] Assessing the role of advanced artificial intelligence as a tool in multidisciplinary tumor board decision-making for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer cases - the first study on ChatGPT 4o and a comparison to ChatGPT 4.0
    Schmidl, Benedikt
    Huetten, Tobias
    Pigorsch, Steffi
    Stoegbauer, Fabian
    Hoch, Cosima C.
    Hussain, Timon
    Wollenberg, Barbara
    Wirth, Markus
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [9] Exploration of Clinician Perspectives on Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Function Beyond Clinical Decision-making
    Wong, Bonnie O.
    Blythe, Jacob A.
    Wu, Adela
    Batten, Jason N.
    Kennedy, Kristin M.
    Kouaho, Amanda S.
    Wren, Sherry M.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (08) : 1210 - 1212
  • [10] Treatment decision-making in breast cancer: role of the multidisciplinary team meeting in a breast unit
    Generali, Daniele
    Rossi, Camillo
    Bottini, Alberto
    BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2015, 4 (03) : 121 - 123