Scholars and the Politics of International Art Restitution

被引:1
|
作者
Subotic, Jelena [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Atlanta, GA 30302 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0960777322000613
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
Almost every week brings news of another major European museum agreeing to return looted art. Since the 2000s we have grown somewhat accustomed to the headlines describing a ceremonial return to its original owners of a painting looted in the Holocaust, a process that took decades to develop and was initially met with considerable resistance in the art world and in the countries where this art was displayed.(1) In the past few years, however, building in part on the perceived success of Holocaust art restitution but also on the increased visibility and impact of national and global social movements demanding racial justice and institutional decolonisation, major international museums have come under ever stronger pressure to return art looted as part of colonial occupations. Perhaps the most organised of the current campaigns is the campaign to return the so-called 'Benin Bronzes' - a vast collection of various artifacts looted from the Kingdom of Benin (in today's Nigeria) and dispersed across major international museums, most prominently the British Museum in London, the Ethnological Museum in Berlin, and the Musee du quai Branly in Paris, among others. Since 2020, a number of museums have pledged to return their holdings of Benin Bronzes and restitute them to Nigeria, where a major new museum is being built to display them in Benin City. All of this activity has also reenergised perhaps the most famous case for restitution - the movement to return the Parthenon 'Elgin' marbles from the British Museum to the Acropolis in Athens.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 37
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条