Is Twelve Hours Really the Optimum Photoperiod for Promoting Flowering in Indoor-Grown Cultivars of Cannabis sativa?

被引:6
|
作者
Ahrens, Ashleigh [1 ]
Llewellyn, David [1 ]
Zheng, Youbin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Sci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 14期
关键词
medicinal cannabis; daylength; flower initiation; controlled environment agriculture; lighting; L;
D O I
10.3390/plants12142605
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Cannabis sativa ("cannabis" hereafter) is a valuable recent addition to Canada's economy with the legalization for recreational use in 2018. The vast majority of indoor cannabis cultivators use a 12-h light/12-h dark photoperiod to promote flowering. To test the hypothesis that robust flowering initiation responses can be promoted in indoor-grown cannabis cultivars under longer photoperiods, clones of ten drug-type cannabis cultivars were grown under six photoperiod treatments. All treatments were based on a standard 24-h day and included 12 h, 12.5 h, 13 h, 13.5 h, 14 h, and 15 h of light. The plants were grown in a growth chamber for 3 to 4 weeks, receiving an approximate light intensity of 360 & mu;mol & BULL;m(-2)& BULL;s(-1) from white LEDs. Flowering initiation, defined as the appearance of & GE;3 pairs of stigmas at the apex of the primary shoot, occurred in all cultivars under all photoperiod treatments up to 14 h. Delays in flowering initiation time under 14 h vs. 12 h ranged from no delay to approximately 4 days, depending on the cultivar. Some cultivars also initiated flowering under 15 h, but floral tissues did not further develop beyond the initiation phase. Harvest metrics of some cultivars responded quadratically with increasing photoperiod, with ideal levels of key flowering parameters varying between 12 h and 13 h. These results suggest there is potential to increase yield in some indoor-grown cannabis cultivars by using longer than 12-h photoperiods during the flowering stage of production. This is attributed to the inherently higher daily light integrals. Indoor cannabis growers should investigate the photoperiod responses of their individual cultivars to determine the optimal photoperiod for producing floral biomass.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Longer Photoperiod Substantially Increases Indoor-Grown Cannabis' Yield and Quality: A Study of Two High-THC Cultivars Grown under 12 h vs. 13 h Days
    Ahrens, Ashleigh
    Llewellyn, David
    Zheng, Youbin
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (03):
  • [2] Development of a hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) simulation model 2.: The flowering response of two hemp cultivars to photoperiod
    Lisson, SN
    Mendham, NJ
    Carberry, PS
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2000, 40 (03) : 413 - 417
  • [3] Cannabis sativa L. Inflorescences from Monoecious Cultivars Grown in Central Italy: An Untargeted Chemical Characterization from Early Flowering to Ripening
    Ingallina, Cinzia
    Sobolev, Anatoly P.
    Circi, Simone
    Spano, Mattia
    Fraschetti, Caterina
    Filippi, Antonello
    Di Sotto, Antonella
    Di Giacomo, Silvia
    Mazzoccanti, Giulia
    Gasparrini, Francesco
    Quaglio, Deborah
    Campiglia, Enio
    Carradori, Simone
    Locatelli, Marcello
    Vinci, Giuliana
    Rapa, Mattia
    Ciano, Salvatore
    Giusti, Anna Maria
    Botta, Bruno
    Ghirga, Francesca
    Capitani, Donatella
    Mannina, Luisa
    MOLECULES, 2020, 25 (08):