Rutting Resistance Evaluation of Highly Polymer-Modified Asphalt Binder and Mixes Using Different Performance Parameters

This study focused on evaluating the rutting performance of three different highly polymer-modified asphalt (HiMA) binders (i.e., O, T and B) using binder-based [i.e., multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) and force ductility (FD)] and mix-based [flow number (FN) and Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT)] rutting performance tests. The binder-based rutting indicators were compared with mix rutting performance to determine a parameter that can help in the correct prediction of HiMA rutting resistance. In addition, the study looked into application of a simple performance test, the indirect rutting tolerance index (IDEAL-RT), for HiMA mix rutting prediction. The MSCR test revealed different rankings of recovery at 0.1- and 3.2-kPa stress levels. Moreover, the T and B binders did not satisfy the stress sensitivity criteria (J(nr_difference)) of Max 75%. The force ductility tests revealed that the peak force observed for polymer network phase in HiMA was significantly higher than base binder stiffness, which is in contrast with force distribution in polymer-modified binders (PMBs). The mix rutting resistance ranking (O>T>B) was similar in all the tests (i.e., FN, HWTT, and IDEAL-RT). Although IDEAL-RT can be used to compare the rutting resistances of HiMA mixes, detailed future work is required to establish its acceptability in comparing various types of mixes and the minimum requirements of RTIndex. The comparison between binder and mix rutting indicators demonstrated that MSCR testing on binder at stress levels of 6.4 kPa and higher can be used to predict the rutting resistance of HiMA binders. Parameters like slope and cohesion energy and a newly introduced parameter-work done for polymer activation (W-PA)-from FD tests can be used to determine the polymeric phase dominance in HiMA binders. Overall, this study provides pavement stakeholders with a framework for rightly predicting the rutting resistance and polymeric phase dominance of HiMA binders and mixes using MSCR, FD, and IDEAL-RT tests.