Mechanisms of Forestry Carbon Sink Policies on Land Use Efficiency: A Perspective from the Drivers of Policy Implementation

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Yunduan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Law, Int Law, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
[2] Jimei Univ, Finance & Econ Coll, Dept Int Econ & Trade, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
关键词
difference-in-difference model; forestry carbon sink; land use efficiency; public opinion; rewards and penalties; IMPACT; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.3390/land12101860
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapid urbanization has brought economic dividends to China, but it has been accompanied by inefficient land use. Meanwhile, the mechanism of forestry carbon sinks (FCSs) on land use efficiency (LUE) has not been sufficiently discussed in the context of the pursuit of "carbon neutrality" around the world. Based on the idea of the benefit-cost theory, this study investigated the impact of FCSs on LUE in 30 provincial-level regions (2006-2019) in China using the difference-in-difference model. The results showed that, first, via the mechanisms of public opinion (PO) and rewards and penalties (RP), FCSs could significantly improve the LUE in the regions, and that the former had a greater effect than the latter; second, the tests of the assumption of parallel trends showed that FCSs had a slower effect on the LUE under the PO mechanism than under the RP mechanism; third, the analysis of the LUE showed that the improvement in LUE mainly occurred in the eastern, central, and southwestern regions of China. The conclusions were as follows: (1) FCS is able to promote LUE via both the PO and RP mechanisms; (2) there is a lag in the promotion of LUE by FCS, and the lag is larger with the PO mechanism; and (3) there is spatial clustering in the promotion of LUE by FCS. In line with these conclusions, we propose policy recommendations to better exploit the policy effects of FCSs in three aspects, namely promoting the development of forestry carbon sink projects, improving the relevant mechanisms of FCSs, and improving the mechanisms of PO and RP.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of Forestry Carbon Sink on Land Use Space Based on FLUS Model
    Feng, Shuo
    Chen, Ke
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [2] Annual emissions of carbon from land use, land-use change, and forestry from 1850 to 2020
    Houghton, Richard A.
    Castanho, Andrea
    EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA, 2023, 15 (05) : 2025 - 2054
  • [3] Identification and analysis of drivers for carbon regulatory environmental policies implementation in manufacturing supply chain: A zero carbon perspective
    Solanki, Rahul
    Kannan, Devika
    Darbari, Jyoti Dhingra
    Jha, P. C.
    CLEANER LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN, 2024, 11
  • [4] The Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy and Urban Land Use Efficiency: A Policy Assessment from China
    Liu, Jingbo
    Feng, Haoyuan
    Wang, Kun
    LAND, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [5] Emissions of carbon from forestry and land-use change in tropical Asia
    Houghton, RA
    Hackler, JL
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 1999, 5 (04) : 481 - 492
  • [6] Drivers and reduction potential of carbon emissions from cultivated land use
    Ma, Jiayi
    Feng, Xinhui
    Wang, Sensen
    Liu, Fei
    Li, Yan
    CATENA, 2024, 247
  • [7] The implementation of strategic land use policy: Lessons from the Lyon conurbation
    Booth, P
    Poxon, J
    Stephenson, R
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2001, 35 (05) : 479 - 485
  • [8] Carbon prices and greenhouse gases abatement from agriculture, forestry and land use in Nepal
    Pradhan, Bijay B.
    Shrestha, Ram M.
    Hoa, Nguyen T.
    Matsuoka, Yuzuru
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 43 : 26 - 36
  • [9] The Impact of Land Use Change on Disaster Risk from the Perspective of Efficiency
    Su, Qingmu
    Chen, Kaida
    Liao, Lingyun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [10] Country-level estimates of gross and net carbon fluxes from land use, land-use change and forestry
    Obermeier, Wolfgang Alexander
    Schwingshackl, Clemens
    Bastos, Ana
    Conchedda, Giulia
    Gasser, Thomas
    Grassi, Giacomo
    Houghton, Richard A.
    Tubiello, Francesco Nicola
    Sitch, Stephen
    Pongratz, Julia
    EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA, 2024, 16 (01) : 605 - 645