Casing Reliability Evaluation of HTHP Wells Via Uncertainty and Stress-Strength Interference Theories

被引:0
|
作者
Han, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Rongdong [1 ]
Pu, Wenxue [3 ]
Guan, Zhichuan [4 ]
Tian, Qizhong [1 ]
Zhao, Haibin [3 ]
Ma, Xianming [4 ]
Chen, Shengnan [5 ]
Zhang, Bo [6 ]
Li, Chenglong [1 ,2 ]
Shao, Hui [3 ]
Zhang, Cong [3 ]
机构
[1] SINOPEC, Petr Engn Technol Res Inst Shengli Oilfield, Dongying, Peoples R China
[2] SINOPEC, Postdoctoral Sci Res Working Stn Shengli Oilfield, Dongying, Peoples R China
[3] Sinopec Matrix Corp, Geosteering & Logging Res Inst, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Petr Engn, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Chem & Petr Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] CNPC Res Inst Safety & Environm Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
HTHP wells; Casing reliability; Annulus pressure; Stress-strength interference theory; Hollowing degree; Uncertainty theory; ANNULAR PRESSURE; SAFETY; OIL;
D O I
10.1007/s40995-023-01564-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Casing reliability is essential for the high-temperature high-pressure (HTHP) wells. The complicated downhole geological environment, high casing external load during the drilling stage, and annulus pressure in the production stage may all lead to casing collapse and wellbore integrity failure. Thus, it remains a hot topic to quantitatively evaluate the casing reliability throughout the whole life cycle (WLC) of HTHP wells. In this paper, a WLC quantitative evaluation method of casing reliability of HTHP wells in the whole borehole section is established based on the Monte Carlo simulation and the stress-strength interference theory. More specifically, WLC casing load is calculated by integrating the annulus pressure, casing load under non-uniform in situ stress, and the drilling extreme conditions. The casing strength calculation model of HTHP wells is then established by the K-T formula, while considering the temperature effect on casing strength to compute the casing reliability. The proposed method is applied in an HTHP gas well in the South China Sea. The results indicate that, under the hollowing degrees with allowable safety factors, there is still some risk in the casing running and lost circulation conditions. The failure risk at the weak points of each spud is within 0.08-0.2 in the casing running condition and within 0.1-0.5 in the lost circulation condition. For the production stage, before and after annulus pressurization, the overall trend of the casing safety factor of anti-internal-pressure remains the same and decreases with increasing well depth. The weak points exist at the inner cement surface or boundary point of different wall thickness casings. The risk of casing extrusion after annulus pressurization increases with decreasing well depth. Due to the lack of consideration of annulus pressure and uncertainty in the conventional casing-strength design methods, there is a possible failure risk at the casing weak points after annulus pressurization, where the reliability at the weak points on both side casings of annulus C is within 0.55-0.67 under annulus pressure 19MPa. The research verifies that the casing strength design should leave a margin in the HTHP environment to avoid high temperatures reducing reliability. Under the leak-prone strata condition, the casing strength at weak points should be strengthened accordingly. The casing-strength design considering annulus pressure and uncertainty will improve the casing reliability. In addition, this method can also be used to calculate the maximum allowable annulus pressure and the maximum allowable hollowing degree under the existing production and drilling plans, thus helping to optimize production and casing strength design.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 227
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Casing Reliability Evaluation of HTHP Wells Via Uncertainty and Stress–Strength Interference Theories
    Chao Han
    Rongdong Dai
    Wenxue Pu
    Zhichuan Guan
    QiZhong Tian
    Haibin Zhao
    Xianming Ma
    Shengnan (Nancy) Chen
    Bo Zhang
    Chenglong Li
    Hui Shao
    Cong Zhang
    Iranian Journal of Science, 2024, 48 : 213 - 227
  • [2] Stress-strength interference model including model uncertainty
    Bao, Hongbing
    Yao, Weixing
    Lixue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2008, 40 (06): : 834 - 839
  • [3] Fuzzy reliability using a discrete stress-strength interference model
    Wang, JD
    Liu, TS
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1996, 45 (01) : 145 - 149
  • [4] OPTIMIZATION CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN RELIABILITY BY STRESS-STRENGTH INTERFERENCE THEORY
    TARAMAN, SI
    KAPUR, KC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1975, R 24 (02) : 136 - 138
  • [5] Fuzzy reliability using a discrete stress-strength interference model
    Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Hsinchu, Taiwan
    IEEE Trans Reliab, 1 (145-149):
  • [6] A Study on EMC Stress-strength Interference Model and EMC Reliability
    Wu, Jian
    Xie, Shuguo
    Ke, Tenglong
    Chen, Xi
    Li, Can
    2012 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS, PROPAGATION & EM THEORY (ISAPE), 2012, : 677 - 680
  • [7] STRESS-STRENGTH RELIABILITY MODELS
    DHILLON, BS
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1980, 20 (04): : 513 - 516
  • [8] Reliability design for initiating devices based on stress-strength interference model
    Yi, Xiao-Jian
    Dong, Hai-Ping
    Zhai, Zhi-Qiang
    Lei, Hua-Jin
    Cai, Rui-Jiao
    Beijing Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2014, 34 (10): : 1007 - 1011
  • [9] Reliability Assessment Method Based on Interference Variable for Stress-Strength Model
    吴琼
    杨建中
    王晶燕
    满剑锋
    孙国鹏
    Journal of Donghua University(English Edition), 2015, 32 (06) : 1047 - 1051
  • [10] Reliability Model Based on Stress-strength Interference for Marine Propulsion Shafting
    Chen, Shuai
    Yuan, Chengqing
    Yan, Xinping
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION AND SAFETY (ICTIS 2015), 2015, : 481 - 484