Can environmental protection tax drive manufacturing carbon unlocking? Empirical evidence from China

被引:2
|
作者
Wen, Limin [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Shufang [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Res Ctr Management Sci & Engn, Nanchang, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Nanchang, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
environmental protection tax; manufacturing; carbon unlocking; super-efficiency sbm; PSM-DID; DOUBLE DIVIDEND; ECONOMY; TAXATION;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2023.1274785
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
IntroductionChina's environmental protection tax policy has emerged as a pivotal force in steering the country towards reduced pollution and carbon emissions. This study focuses on evaluating the impact of the environmental protection tax on carbon unlocking within the manufacturing industry, offering crucial insights to address the dual challenges of industry development and carbon emission reduction.MethodsUtilizing Chinese provincial panel data spanning from 2004 to 2020, we gauge the carbon unlocking efficiency of the manufacturing industry using the super-efficiency slacks-based measure (SBM) model with undesired outputs. Additionally, we empirically examine the impact of the environmental protection tax policy on manufacturing carbon unlocking through the propensity score matching difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) model.ResultsOur findings indicate a significant enhancement in the carbon unlocking efficiency of the manufacturing industry due to the implementation of the environmental protection tax policy. Compared with the provinces (municipalities) that did not raise the environmental protection tax rate standard, the carbon unlocking efficiency of manufacturing in the provinces (municipalities) that raised the environmental protection tax rate standard increased by 11.6%, and the dynamic effect shows that the policy effect increases gradually over time. Further mechanism tests reveal that an environmental protection tax improves manufacturing carbon unlocking efficiency mainly by stimulating manufacturing firms to increase environmental protection investment and green technology innovation. Moreover, there is heterogeneity in the policy effect of the environmental protection tax, and its impact on manufacturing carbon unlocking is more significant in the central and western regions and regions with higher levels of legalization.DiscussionTherefore, we should adhere to the policy orientation of low-carbon development in manufacturing, accelerate green technological innovation in manufacturing, and coordinate the special advantages of each region according to local conditions to bring into play the role of an environmental protection tax in reducing carbon and improving efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can "environmental protection fee to tax" reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from China
    Du, Jiangze
    Li, Zhiwei
    Shi, Guoping
    Wang, Bin
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
  • [2] Can Social Capital Drive Economic Growth and Environmental Protection?-Evidence from China
    Wan, Jianxiang
    Wan, Haiyan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 66
  • [3] Can Environmental Protection Tax Promote Urban Green Transformation? Experimental Evidence from China
    Qi, Zhankun
    Long, Feng
    Bi, Fenfen
    Tian, Xue
    Qian, Ziwei
    Duan, Xianming
    Ge, Chazhong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [4] Environmental protection tax and trade credit: Evidence from China
    Lu, Xueyao
    Cheng, Lin
    Niu, Yuhao
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [5] Can environmental regulation improve the industrial ecology efficiency? Evidence from China's environmental protection tax reform
    Kong, Lingqian
    Yao, Yuxiu
    Xu, Kai
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 373
  • [6] Environmental protection tax and firms' ESG investment: Evidence from China
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Ye, Yingying
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2024, 131
  • [7] How can carbon markets drive the development of renewable energy sector ? Empirical evidence from China
    Cheng, Jiamin
    Jiang, Yuanying
    DATA SCIENCE IN FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 2024, 4 (02): : 249 - 269
  • [8] Can environmental tax curb air pollution: evidence from China
    Li, Zheng
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (11) : 1449 - 1452
  • [9] Impact of Environmental Protection Tax on carbon intensity in China
    Zhong S.
    Zhou Z.
    Jin D.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (20) : 29695 - 29718
  • [10] Tax incentives and environmental, social, and governance performance: empirical evidence from China
    Naiping Zhu
    Yueyong Zhou
    Siyi Zhang
    Jin Yan
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 54899 - 54913