Performance of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging validated by targeted and systematic transperineal biopsies

被引:3
|
作者
Hsi, Richard A. [1 ,6 ]
Dinh, Tru-Khang [2 ]
Greer, Matthew [2 ]
Bensen, Carleen [3 ]
Mitchell, Marc A. [4 ]
Li, Amy Y. [4 ]
Stamm, Andrew [4 ]
Henne, Manfred [5 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Canc Care Alliance Peninsula, Poulsbo, WA USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Olymp Med Ctr, Port Angeles, WA USA
[4] Doctors Clin, Silverdale, WA USA
[5] Rayus Imaging, Poulsbo, WA USA
[6] Seattle Canc Care Alliance Peninsula, 19917 7th Ave NE, Suite 100, Poulsbo, WA 98370 USA
来源
BJUI COMPASS | 2023年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
MR-guided biopsy; multiparametric prostate MRI; PI-RADS score; prostate cancer; transperineal biopsy; VERSION; 2; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.184
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo measure the performance of multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify intraprostatic tumour deposits using a systematic and targeted MR-guided transperineal prostate biopsy technique.Materials and MethodsPatients underwent a combined systematic and targeted MR-guided transperineal biopsy procedure in the dorsal lithotomy position under general anaesthesia. Systematic biopsies were spaced 10 mm or less apart and additional biopsies targeted any Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3, 4 or 5 lesions identified on mpMRI. Cancer detection rates were calculated on a per patient and per lesion basis.ResultsA total of 125 patients underwent the biopsy procedure. The positive predictive value (PPV) of mpMRI per patient was 59% for any cancer and 49% for Gleason score (GS) >= 7 cancer. The negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI per patient was 67% for any cancer and 88% for GS >= 7 cancer. On a per lesion basis, the PPV of PI-RADS 3 lesions for any and GS >= 7 cancer was 24% and 10%. For PI-RADS 4 lesions it was 42% and 32%. For PI-RADS 5 lesions, it was 76% and 70%. MpMRI failed to identify GS >= 7 cancer found on systematic biopsy in 22% of patients.ConclusionBased on a combination of systematic and targeted transperineal prostate biopsies, mpMRI showed a high NPV and low PPV for GS >= 7 cancer on a per patient basis. The PPV of mpMRI on a per lesion basis increased with increasing PI-RADS score. However, there were a significant number of both false positive as well as false negative (mpMRI invisible) areas within the prostate that contained GS >= 7 cancer. Therefore, pathologic confirmation using both targeted and systematic mapping biopsy is necessary to accurately identify all intraprostatic tumour deposits.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 103
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted and systematic transperineal prostate biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis
    Galea, L. A.
    Frentescu, F.
    Tan, A.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2022, 81 : 188 - 188
  • [2] There Is No Way to Avoid Systematic Prostate Biopsies in Addition to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsies
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Stabile, Armando
    Soligo, Matteo
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Esposito, Antonio
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Deho, Federico
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (01): : 112 - 118
  • [3] Systematic transperineal and magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies: the resolution of uncertainty
    Popert, Rick
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (01) : 6 - 7
  • [4] Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and cognitively targeted transperineal biopsy: Initial results
    Minh, T. N.
    Thanh, H. P.
    Tuan, V. N.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 : 19 - 19
  • [5] Can we avoid systematic biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpRMI) targeted biopsies?
    Calzas Montalvo, C.
    Sopena Sutil, R.
    Juste Alvarez, S.
    Gil Moradillo, J.
    Garcia Gonzalez, L.
    Rodriguez-Izquierdo Jimenez, M.
    Garcia Gonzalez, B.
    Caro Gonzalez, M. A. D. P.
    De la Calle Moreno, A.
    Garcia-Rayo Encinas, C.
    Gonzalez Ginel, I
    Rodriguez Antolin, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S742 - S742
  • [6] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Charalampos, Fragkoulis
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 36 (03) : 229 - 230
  • [7] A Multicenter Study of the Clinical Utility of Nontargeted Systematic Transperineal Prostate Biopsies in Patients Undergoing Pre-Biopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Tay, Kae Jack
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (06): : 1201 - 1201
  • [8] Will Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies Replace Systematic Biopsies?
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2015, 1 (02): : 156 - 157
  • [9] Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cognitively Targeted Transperineal Biopsy in Patients With Previous Abdominoperineal Resection and Suspicion of Prostate Cancer
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Caglic, Iztok
    Berman, Laurence H.
    Kastner, Christof
    Doble, Andrew
    Barrett, Tristan
    UROLOGY, 2016, 96 : 8 - 14
  • [10] ROUTINE SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSIES NOT REPLACED BY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-TARGETED BIOPSY
    Gomez-Ortiz, David
    Garza-Gangemi, Adrian M.
    Oropeza-Aguilar, Mariano
    Rangel-Suarez, Sergio
    Espinosa-Cruz, Veronica
    Villegas-Hernandez, Antonio C.
    Martinez-Martinez, Ricardo
    Castillejos-Molina, Ricardo A.
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2022, 74 (04): : 212 - 218