Handedness, Bilateral, and Interdigit Strength Asymmetries in Male Climbers

被引:2
|
作者
Hartley, Cameron [1 ,2 ]
Taylor, Nicola [1 ]
Chidley, Joel [1 ]
Balas, Jiri [3 ]
Giles, Dave [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Derby, Clin Exercise & Rehabil Res Ctr, Derby, England
[2] Lattice Training Ltd, Chesterfield, England
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Phys Educ & Sport, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
finger strength; bouldering; dominant; injury; force production; FORCE PRODUCTION; IMBALANCES; INJURIES; KINETICS; TASKS; GRIP;
D O I
10.1123/ijspp.2023-0030
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether there are bilateral and interdigit differences in the maximal force production of experienced climbers and whether these differences are mediated by ability level or preferred style of climbing. Methods: Thirty-six male climbers (age 30 [9.4] y) took part in a single-session trial to test their maximal force production on both hands. The tests included a one-arm maximal isometric finger flexor strength test (MIFS) and a one-arm individual MIFS. Bilateral differences were analyzed by strongest hand (defined as the hand that produced the highest MIFS value) and dominance (defined as the writing hand). Results: A pairwise t test found that MIFS was significantly greater for the strongest hand (mean difference = 4.1%, 95% CI, -0.052 to 0.029, P < .001), with handedness explaining 89% of the variation. A 2-way mixed-model analysis of variance determined that there were no interactions between preferred style (bouldering or sport climbing) and MIFS or between ability level (advanced or elite) and MIFS. Conclusions: Climbers have significant finger flexor strength bilateral asymmetries between their strongest and weakest hand. Moreover, when dominance is controlled, this difference in strength is present, with the dominant hand producing more force. Neither preferred style of climbing nor the ability level of the climbers could explain these asymmetries. As such, practitioners should consider regularly monitoring unilateral strength, aiming to minimize the likelihood of large bilateral asymmetry occurring.
引用
收藏
页码:1390 / 1397
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bilateral and Unilateral Asymmetries of Isokinetic Strength and Flexibility in Male Young Professional Soccer Players
    Daneshjoo, Abdolhamid
    Rahnama, Nader
    Mokhtar, Abdul Halim
    Yusof, Ashril
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN KINETICS, 2013, 36 : 45 - 53
  • [2] The bilateral strength and power asymmetries in untrained boys
    Maly, Tomas
    Zahalka, Frantisek
    Mala, Lucia
    Cech, Pavol
    OPEN MEDICINE, 2015, 10 (01): : 224 - 232
  • [3] Dual asymmetries in handedness
    Jones, GV
    Martin, M
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2003, 26 (02) : 227 - +
  • [4] PEDAL ASYMMETRIES AND HANDEDNESS
    ORSINI, DL
    SATZ, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 7 (01) : 127 - 129
  • [5] MORPHOLOGIC CEREBRAL ASYMMETRIES AND HANDEDNESS
    GOLDBLATT, D
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1995, 52 (12) : 1137 - 1138
  • [6] ATTENTIONAL ASYMMETRIES AS A DETERMINANT OF HANDEDNESS
    VERFAELLIE, M
    HEILMAN, KM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 9 (01) : 32 - 32
  • [7] MORPHOLOGIC CEREBRAL ASYMMETRIES AND HANDEDNESS - REPLY
    FOUNDAS, AL
    LEONARD, CM
    HEILMAN, KM
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1995, 52 (12) : 1138 - 1138
  • [8] Exploring handedness asymmetries in the Simon effect
    Julia C. Seibold
    Jing Chen
    Robert W. Proctor
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2016, 78 : 437 - 451
  • [9] Handedness, hemispheric asymmetries, and joke comprehension
    Coulson, S
    Lovett, C
    COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 19 (03): : 275 - 288
  • [10] Exploring handedness asymmetries in the Simon effect
    Seibold, Julia C.
    Chen, Jing
    Proctor, Robert W.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2016, 78 (02) : 437 - 451