Estimating the lifetime risk of a false positive screening test result

被引:7
|
作者
White, Tim [1 ,2 ]
Algeri, Sara [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Stat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Stat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE; RECOMMENDATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; ADHERENCE; BIOPSY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0281153
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
False positive results in screening tests have potentially severe psychological, medical, and financial consequences for the recipient. However, there have been few efforts to quantify how the risk of a false positive accumulates over time. We seek to fill this gap by estimating the probability that an individual who adheres to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening guidelines will receive at least one false positive in a lifetime. To do so, we assembled a data set of 116 studies cited by the USPSTF that report the number of true positives, false negatives, true negatives, and false positives for the primary screening procedure for one of five cancers or six sexually transmitted diseases. We use these data to estimate the probability that an individual in one of 14 demographic subpopulations will receive at least one false positive for one of these eleven diseases in a lifetime. We specify a suitable statistical model to account for the hierarchical structure of the data, and we use the parametric bootstrap to quantify the uncertainty surrounding our estimates. The estimated probability of receiving at least one false positive in a lifetime is 85.5% (+/- 0.9%) and 38.9% (+/- 3.6%) for baseline groups of women and men, respectively. It is higher for subpopulations recommended to screen more frequently than the baseline, including more vulnerable groups such as pregnant women and men who have sex with men. Since screening technology is imperfect, false positives remain inevitable. The high lifetime risk of a false positive reveals the importance of educating patients about this phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive test in a repeated screening program
    Xu, JL
    Fagerstrom, RM
    Prorok, PC
    Kramer, BS
    BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (03) : 651 - 660
  • [2] Estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive test in a repeated screening program
    Xu, Jian-Lun
    Fagerstrom, Richard M.
    Prorok, Philip C.
    Kramer, Barnett S.
    Biometrics, 3 (651-660):
  • [3] CUMULATIVE RISK OF FALSE POSITIVE SCREENING MAMMOGRAM RESULT
    Henderson, L. M.
    Matuszewski, J.
    Jarman, M.
    Yankaskas, B. C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 171 : S95 - S95
  • [4] Mammography screening adherence after a false positive test result
    Marsh, Mary W.
    Benefield, Thad
    Greenwood-Hickman, Mikael Anne
    Jones, Laura
    Meyer, Anne Marie
    Henderson, Louise M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [5] Risk of false-positive result in mammography screening in Brazil
    Santos, Renata Oliveira Maciel dos
    de Assis, Monica
    Dias, Maria Beatriz Kneipp
    Tomazelli, Jeane Glaucia
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2023, 39 (05):
  • [6] Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test
    Baker, Stuart G.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (03) : 291 - 293
  • [7] Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Smith, Robert A.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (05) : 429 - 449
  • [8] A false-positive tuberculin test result
    Parmar, MS
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2000, 162 (01) : 19 - 19
  • [9] THERAPEUTIC COOLING: A POSSIBLE CAUSE OF A FALSE POSITIVE TSH NEWBORN SCREENING TEST RESULT?
    Perlsteyn, Martin
    Van Vliet, Guy
    Deladoey, Johnny
    HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS, 2017, 88 : 397 - 397
  • [10] False positive result on colorimetric methanol screening test: report of two cases with hyperglycaemia
    Chan, Jones C. M.
    Ng, James M. H.
    Wong, Raymond S. M.
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 58 (06) : 602 - 602