Research Note: Welfare and stress responses of broiler chickens raised in conventional and animal welfare-certified broiler farms

被引:6
|
作者
Kwon, Byung-Yeon [1 ]
Lee, Hyun-Gwan [1 ]
Jeon, Yong-Sung [1 ]
Song, Ju-Yong [1 ]
Kim, Sang-Ho [2 ]
Kim, Dong-Wook [3 ]
Kim, Chan-Ho [4 ]
Lee, Kyung-Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] Konkuk Univ, Sanghuh Coll Life Sci, Dept Anim Sci & Technol, Seoul 05029, South Korea
[2] K AniWel, Suwon 16672, South Korea
[3] Korea Natl Univ Agr & Fisheries, Dept Livestock, Jeonju 54874, South Korea
[4] Natl Inst Anim Sci, Anim Welf Res Team, Wonju 55365, South Korea
关键词
animal welfare; broiler; footpad dermatitis; hock burn; stocking density; CORTICOSTERONE; LITTER; FEATHERS; BEHAVIOR; AMMONIA; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.psj.2023.103402
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The present study was conducted to assess the animal welfare status of broiler chickens raised in conventional and welfare-certified farms. One conventional farm (30,000 birds/house, 1,488 m(2)/house, 2 houses) and one animal welfare-certified farm (32,000 birds/house, 1,920 m(2)/house, 2 houses) were selected to measure productivity, stress responses, and animal welfare indicators in 3 broiler flocks (2 farms/season, n = 6 flocks/farm type) during summer, autumn, and spring. Upon farm visits, body weight, uniformity, and animal welfare indicators (i.e., fecal and feather corticosterone, footpad dermatitis, hock burn, feather dirtiness, and gait score) were measured at 26 d posthatch. Also, moisture, nitrogen, and pH of litter, light intensity, ammonia concentration, and body surface temperature of head, chest, and legs were measured. There was no difference in body weight and uniformity between farm types. Fecal corticosterone concentrations were higher (P = 0.021) in welfare-certified vs. conventional farm, but no significant difference was found in feather corticosterone. Welfare-certified vs. conventional farm had lower percentages of hock burn (P = 0.018), feather dirtiness scores (P = 0.009), and gait score (P = 0.040), and there was no difference in footpad dermatitis. Nitrogen content in litter samples tended to be higher in conventional vs. welfare-certified farms (P = 0.094), and there was no difference in moisture and pH between farm types. Ammonia concentration within the broiler houses was not different between 2 farms. However, animal welfare farm was found to be brighter than conventional farm (P < 0.001). The body surface temperature of head, chest, and legs was not different between farm types. In conclusion, the welfare-certified farm had higher welfare measures, including lower hock burn, feather dirtiness, and gait score, confirming an overall improvement in welfare indicators. However, the observation on the elevated feather corticosterone noted in welfare vs. conventionally raised chickens warrants further studies.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Effects of Perch on Productivity, Welfare, and Physiological Indicators of Broiler Chickens Reared in Animal Welfare-Certificated Farms
    Kwon, Byung-Yeon
    Kim, Seong-Taek
    Kim, Da-Hye
    Park, Jina
    Lee, Hyun-Gwan
    Jeon, Yong-Sung
    Song, Ju-Young
    Kim, Sang-Ho
    Kim, Dong-Wook
    Kim, Chan-Ho
    Lee, Kyung-Woo
    VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2024, 11 (12)
  • [2] Monitoring animal welfare on commercial broiler farms in Sweden
    Algers, B
    Berg, C
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 51 : 88 - 92
  • [3] Broiler chicken welfare assessment in GLOBALGAP® certified and non-certified farms in Brazil
    Souza, A. P. O.
    de Oliveira Sans, E. C.
    Mueller, B. R.
    Molento, C. F. M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2015, 24 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [4] Hybrid governance and welfare standards for broiler chickens raised for human consumption
    Chen, Peter John
    O'Sullivan, Siobhan
    Pyke, Susan
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2024,
  • [5] Physiological stress and welfare of broiler chickens in transit: Solutions not problems!
    Mitchell, MA
    Kettlewell, PJ
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1998, 77 (12) : 1803 - 1814
  • [6] Behaviour and animal welfare indicators of broiler chickens housed in an enriched environment
    Lourenco da Silva, Marconi Italo
    Almeida Paz, Ibiara Correia de Lima
    Chaves, Gustavo Henrique Coelho
    Almeida, Iane Correia de Lima
    Ouros, Caio Cesar dos
    Souza, Silvia Regina Lucas de
    Milbradt, Elisane Lenita
    Caldara, Fabiana Ribeiro
    Satin, Ana Julia Garcia
    Costa, Gabriel Augusto da
    Glavina, Andreia Soares Goncalves
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [7] Animal Welfare Assessment in Antibiotic-Free and Conventional Broiler Chicken
    Iannetti, Luigi
    Romagnoli, Sara
    Cotturone, Giuseppe
    Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [8] Differences in performance, body conformation, and welfare of conventional and slow-growing broiler chickens raised at 2 stocking densities
    Weimer, S. L.
    Mauromoustakos, A.
    Karcher, D. M.
    Erasmus, M. A.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2020, 99 (09) : 4398 - 4407
  • [9] Investigating the cecal microbiota in broiler poultry farms and its potential relationships with animal welfare
    Di Marcantonio, Lisa
    Marotta, Francesca
    Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri
    Sonntag, Quixi
    Iannetti, Luigi
    Janowicz, Anna
    Di Serafino, Gabriella
    Di Giannatale, Elisabetta
    Garofolo, Giuliano
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 144 : 115 - 125
  • [10] Reliability, practicability and farmers' acceptance of an animal welfare assessment protocol for broiler chickens and turkeys
    Michaelis, Sarina
    Gieseke, Daniel
    Knierim, Ute
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2024, 103 (10)