共 50 条
Prediction of survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the updated Swedish cardiac arrest risk score (SCARS) model
被引:1
|作者:
Sultanian, Pedram
[1
]
Lundgren, Peter
[1
,2
]
Louca, Antros
[1
]
Andersson, Erik
[1
]
Djarv, Therese
[3
]
Hessulf, Fredrik
[4
,5
]
Henningsson, Anna
[4
,5
]
Martinsson, Andreas
[1
,2
]
Nordberg, Per
[6
,7
]
Piasecki, Adam
[4
,5
]
Gupta, Vibha
[1
]
Mandalenakis, Zacharias
[1
,2
]
Taha, Amar
[1
,2
]
Redfors, Bengt
[1
]
Herlitz, Johan
[1
,8
]
Rawshani, Araz
[1
,2
,8
]
机构:
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Inst Med, Dept Mol & Clin Med,Wallenberg Lab, Bla Straket 5, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Bla Straket 5, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Med, Med Solna, Framstegsgatan, S-17164 Solna, Sweden
[4] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Bla Straket 5, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Bla Straket 5, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Inst, Ctr Resuscitat Sci, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Sodersjukhuset, Jagargatan 20,Staircase 1, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Funct Perioperat Med & Intens Care, Tomtebodavagen 18, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Swedish Registry Cardiopulm Resuscitat, Medicinaregatan 18G, S-41390 Gothenburg, Sweden
来源:
关键词:
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest;
Machine learning;
Extreme gradient boosting;
LightGBM;
RESUSCITATION;
D O I:
10.1093/ehjdh/ztae016
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Aims Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major health concern worldwide. Although one-third of all patients achieve a return of spontaneous circulation and may undergo a difficult period in the intensive care unit, only 1 in 10 survive. This study aims to improve our previously developed machine learning model for early prognostication of survival in OHCA.Methods and results We studied all cases registered in the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry during 2010 and 2020 (n = 55 615). We compared the predictive performance of extreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), logistic regression, CatBoost, random forest, and TabNet. For each framework, we developed models that optimized (i) a weighted F1 score to penalize models that yielded more false negatives and (ii) a precision-recall area under the curve (PR AUC). LightGBM assigned higher importance values to a larger set of variables, while XGB made predictions using fewer predictors. The area under the curve receiver operating characteristic (AUC ROC) scores for LightGBM were 0.958 (optimized for weighted F1) and 0.961 (optimized for a PR AUC), while for XGB, the scores were 0.958 and 0.960, respectively. The calibration plots showed a subtle underestimation of survival for LightGBM, contrasting with a mild overestimation for XGB models. In the crucial range of 0-10% likelihood of survival, the XGB model, optimized with the PR AUC, emerged as a clinically safe model.Conclusion We improved our previous prediction model by creating a parsimonious model with an AUC ROC at 0.96, with excellent calibration and no apparent risk of underestimating survival in the critical probability range (0-10%). The model is available at www.gocares.se. Graphical Abstract
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 277
页数:8
相关论文