CMIP6 Earth System Models Project Greater Acceleration of Climate Zone Change Due To Stronger Warming Rates

被引:15
|
作者
Bayar, Ali Serkan [1 ]
Yilmaz, M. Tugrul [1 ]
Yucel, Ismail [1 ]
Dirmeyer, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Water Resources Lab, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] George Mason Univ, Ctr Ocean Land Atmosphere Studies, Fairfax, VA USA
关键词
CMIP6; CMIP5; climate change; global climate models; equilibrium climate sensitivity; Koppen-Geiger climate classification; SIMULATIONS; SHIFTS; PRECIPITATION; BIODIVERSITY; MULTIMODEL; VELOCITY; IMPACTS; RANGES; BIASES;
D O I
10.1029/2022EF002972
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Warming climate and precipitation changes induce notable shifts in climate zones. In this study, the latest generation of global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) and the previous generation CMIP5 under high-emission scenarios are used together with observations and applied to the Koppen-Geiger climate classification. The aim is to shed light on how projected warming and changes in precipitation will influence future climate zones and their associated ecosystems while revealing differences between the two model generations. Compared to CMIP5 models, CMIP6 models exhibit slightly improved performance in replicating the observed Koppen-Geiger map for the historical (1976-2005) period and similar inter-model agreement for the future. The models show major changes in climate zones with a range of projections depending on which ensemble subset is used: 37.9%-48.1% of the global land area is projected to change climate zone by the end of the century, with the most pronounced changes expected over Europe (71.4%-88.6%) and North America (51.2%-65.8%). CMIP6 models project a higher rate of areal climate zone change (km(2)/year) throughout the 21st century, which is mainly driven by their greater global land warming rates. Using a likely equilibrium climate sensitivity subset of CMIP6 models that is consistent with the latest evidence constrains the climate zone shifts, and their projections better match the results of CMIP5 simulations. Although the high warming rates of some CMIP6 models are less credible, the risks associated with them are greater, and they heighten the need for urgent action to preserve terrestrial ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arctic Ocean Amplification in a warming climate in CMIP6 models
    Shu, Qi
    Wang, Qiang
    Arthun, Marius
    Wang, Shizhu
    Song, Zhenya
    Zhang, Min
    Qiao, Fangli
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (30)
  • [2] CMIP6 climate models imply high committed warming
    Chris Huntingford
    Mark S. Williamson
    Femke J. M. M. Nijsse
    Climatic Change, 2020, 162 : 1515 - 1520
  • [3] CMIP6 climate models imply high committed warming
    Huntingford, Chris
    Williamson, Mark S.
    Nijsse, Femke J. M. M.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 162 (03) : 1515 - 1520
  • [4] Implementation of UK Earth System Models for CMIP6
    Sellar, Alistair A.
    Walton, Jeremy
    Jones, Colin G.
    Wood, Richard
    Abraham, Nathan Luke
    Andrejczuk, Miroslaw
    Andrews, Martin B.
    Andrews, Timothy
    Archibald, Alex T.
    de Mora, Lee
    Dyson, Harold
    Elkington, Mark
    Ellis, Richard
    Florek, Piotr
    Good, Peter
    Gohar, Laila
    Haddad, Stephen
    Hardiman, Steven C.
    Hogan, Emma
    Iwi, Alan
    Jones, Christopher D.
    Johnson, Ben
    Kelley, Douglas, I
    Kettleborough, Jamie
    Knight, Jeff R.
    Kohler, Marcus O.
    Kuhlbrodt, Till
    Liddicoat, Spencer
    Linova-Pavlova, Irina
    Mizielinski, Matthew S.
    Morgenstern, Olaf
    Mulcahy, Jane
    Neininger, Erica
    O'Connor, Fiona M.
    Petrie, Ruth
    Ridley, Jeff
    Rioual, Jean-Christophe
    Roberts, Malcolm
    Robertson, Eddy
    Rumbold, Steven
    Seddon, Jon
    Shepherd, Harry
    Shim, Sungbo
    Stephens, Ag
    Teixiera, Joao C.
    Tang, Yongming
    Williams, Jonny
    Wiltshire, Andy
    Griffiths, Paul T.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [5] Simulated responses of soil carbon to climate change in CMIP6 Earth system models: the role of false priming
    Varney, Rebecca M.
    Chadburn, Sarah E.
    Burke, Eleanor J.
    Jones, Simon
    Wiltshire, Andy J.
    Cox, Peter M.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2023, 20 (18) : 3767 - 3790
  • [6] Climate change penalty and benefit on surface ozone: a global perspective based on CMIP6 earth system models
    Zanis, Prodromos
    Akritidis, Dimitris
    Turnock, Steven
    Naik, Vaishali
    Szopa, Sophie
    Georgoulias, Aristeidis K.
    Bauer, Susanne E.
    Deushi, Makoto
    Horowitz, Larry W.
    Keeble, James
    Le Sager, Philippe
    O'Connor, Fiona M.
    Oshima, Naga
    Tsigaridis, Konstantinos
    van Noije, Twan
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [7] Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models
    Thornhill, Gillian
    Collins, William
    Olivi, Dirk
    Skeie, Ragnhild B.
    Archibald, Alex
    Bauer, Susanne
    Checa-Garcia, Ramiro
    Fiedler, Stephanie
    Folberth, Gerd
    Gjermundsen, Ada
    Horowitz, Larry
    Lamarque, Jean-Francois
    Michou, Martine
    Mulcahy, Jane
    Nabat, Pierre
    Naik, Vaishali
    O'Connor, Fiona M.
    Paulot, Fabien
    Schulz, Michael
    Scott, Catherine E.
    Seferian, Roland
    Smith, Chris
    Takemura, Toshihiko
    Tilmes, Simone
    Tsigaridis, Kostas
    Weber, James
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2021, 21 (02) : 1105 - 1126
  • [8] Bioclimatic change as a function of global warming from CMIP6 climate projections
    Sparey, Morgan
    Cox, Peter
    Williamson, Mark S.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2023, 20 (02) : 451 - 488
  • [9] Assessment and Constraint of Mesozooplankton in CMIP6 Earth System Models
    Petrik, C. M.
    Luo, J. Y.
    Heneghan, R. F.
    Everett, J. D.
    Harrison, C. S.
    Richardson, A. J.
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2022, 36 (11)
  • [10] Development of Climate and Earth System Models in China: Past Achievements and New CMIP6 Results
    Zhou, Tianjun
    Chen, Ziming
    Zou, Liwei
    Chen, Xiaolong
    Yu, Yongqiang
    Wang, Bin
    Bao, Qing
    Bao, Ying
    Cao, Jian
    He, Bian
    Hu, Shuai
    Li, Lijuan
    Li, Jian
    Lin, Yanluan
    Ma, Libin
    Qiao, Fangli
    Rong, Xinyao
    Song, Zhenya
    Tang, Yanli
    Wu, Bo
    Wu, Tongwen
    Xin, Xiaoge
    Zhang, He
    Zhang, Minghua
    JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (01) : 1 - 19