Interprofessional clinical decision-making process in health: A scoping review

被引:3
|
作者
Bouchez, Tiphanie [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Cagnon, Clemence [1 ]
Hamouche, Gouraya [1 ]
Majdoub, Marouan [1 ]
Charlet, Jean [2 ,3 ]
Schuers, Matthieu [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cote Azur, Dept Educ & Res Gen Practice, RETINES, HLTH, Nice, France
[2] Univ Sorbonne Paris Nord, Sorbonne Univ, INSERM, LIMICS, Paris, France
[3] Assistance Publ Hop Paris, DRCI, Paris, France
[4] Univ Rouen, Dept Gen Practice, Rouen, France
[5] Acad Hosp Rouen, Dept Med Informat, Rouen, France
[6] Univ Cote Azur, Fac Med, Dept Enseignement & Rech Med Gen, 28, Ave Valombrose, F-06107 Nice 2, France
关键词
decision-making; group process; interprofessional relations; literature review; nurses; patient care team; physicians; rehabilitation; scoping review; social workers; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; MULTIDISCIPLINARY CANCER TEAMS; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; SOCIAL-WORKERS; PHYSICIAN COLLABORATION; PALLIATIVE CARE; NURSE; PATIENT; COMMUNICATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/jan.15865
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimsTo describe the key elements of the interprofessional decision-making process in health, based on published scientific studies. To describe the authors, reviews and subject matter of those publications.DesignScoping review of the literature.Data SourcesMEDLINE, APA Psycinfo OpenGrey, Lissa and Cochrane databases were searched in December 2019 and January 2023.Review MethodsReferences were considered eligible if they (i) were written in French or English, (ii) concerned health, (iii) studied a clinical decision-making process, (iv) were performed in an interprofessional context. 'PRISMA-scoping review' guidelines were respected. The eligible studies were analysed and classified by an inductive approachResultsWe identified 1429 sources of information, 145 of which were retained for the analysis. Based on these studies, we identified five key elements of interprofessional decision-making in health. The process was found to be influenced by group dynamics, the available information and consideration of the unique characteristics of the patient. An organizational framework and specific training favoured improvements in the process.ConclusionDecision-making can be based on a willingness of the healthcare organization to promote models based on more shared leadership and to work on professional roles and values. It also requires healthcare professionals trained in the entire continuum of collaborative practices, to meet the unique needs of each patient. Finally, it appears essential to favour the sharing of multiple sources of accessible and structured information. Tools for knowledge formalization should help to optimize interprofessional decision-making in health.ImpactThe quality of a team decision-making is critical to the quality of care. Interprofessional decision-making can be structured and improved through different levels of action. These improvements could benefit to patients and healthcare professionals in every settings of care involving care collaboration.Impact StatementInterprofessional decision-making in health is an essential lever of quality of care, especially for the most complex patients which are a contemporary challenge. This scoping review article offers a synthesis of a large corpus of data published to date about the interprofessional clinical decision-making process in healthcare. It has the potential to provide a global vision, practical data and a list of references to facilitate the work of healthcare teams, organizations and teachers ready to initiate a change.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 907
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current Trends in Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Programmes in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review
    Sultan, Lama
    Alsaywid, Basim
    De Jong, Nynke
    De Nooijer, Jascha
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [2] Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review
    Schuler, Katharina
    Jung, Ian-C.
    Zerlik, Maria
    Hahn, Waldemar
    Sedlmayr, Martin
    Sedlmayr, Brita
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [3] Digital Twins for Clinical and Operational Decision-Making: Scoping Review
    Riahi, Vahid
    Diouf, Ibrahima
    Khanna, Sankalp
    Boyle, Justin
    Hassanzadeh, Hamed
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [4] INTERPROFESSIONAL DIFFERENCES IN CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING WITH CHILDREN
    WEISSMAN, HN
    PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 6 (03): : 7 - 14
  • [5] Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review
    Doody, Owen
    Davidson, Hope
    Lombard, John
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024,
  • [6] The impact of instrumented gait analysis on decision-making in the interprofessional management of cerebral palsy: A scoping review
    Hebda-Boon, Anna
    Tan, Xiang -Li
    Tillmann, Ricarda
    Shortland, Adam P.
    Firth, Gregory B.
    Morrissey, Dylan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2023, 42 : 60 - 70
  • [7] Wound management: Investigating the interprofessional decision-making process
    Heerschap, Corey
    Nicholas, Andrew
    Whitehead, Meredith
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (01) : 233 - 242
  • [8] Person-Centred Decision-Making in Mental Health: A Scoping Review
    Hormazabal-Salgado, Raul
    Whitehead, Dean
    Osman, Abdi D.
    Hills, Danny
    ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 45 (03) : 294 - 310
  • [9] Key attributes of health and environmental risk decision-making: A scoping review
    Bhuller, Yadvinder
    Bancroft, Xaand
    Deonandan, Raywat
    Grudniewicz, Agnes
    Wiles, Anne
    Krewski, Daniel
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2025,
  • [10] A scoping review of distributed cognition in acute care clinical decision-making
    Wilson, Eric
    Daniel, Michelle
    Rao, Aditi
    Torre, Dario
    Durning, Steven
    Anderson, Clare
    Goldhaber, Nicole H.
    Townsend, Whitney
    Seifert, Colleen M.
    DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 10 (02) : 68 - 88