共 5 条
- [1] AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v TPG INTERNET PTY LTD; FORREST v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION MISLEADING CONDUCT ARISING FROM PUBLIC STATEMENTS: ESTABLISHING THE KNOWLEDGE BASE OF THE TARGET AUDIENCE MELBOURNE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2014, 38 (01): : 281 - 315
- [2] CONTINUOUS DISCLOSURE, CIVIL PENALTIES AND THE ADDITION OF STATE OF MIND REQUIREMENTS - AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION V HOLISTA COLLTECH LTD COMPANY AND SECURITIES LAW JOURNAL, 2025, 41 (01):
- [3] AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION V QUANTUM HOUSING GROUP PTY LTD: A QUANTUM LEAP IN OUR UNDERSTANDING OF UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT? AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF COMPETITION AND CONSUMER LAW, 2021, 29 (03): : 208 - 214
- [4] Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University: The triumph of case management CIVIL JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2010, 29 (01): : 13 - 18
- [5] Misleading or deceptive conduct in the provision of financial services: an empirical and theoretical critique of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) COMPANY AND SECURITIES LAW JOURNAL, 2015, 33 (07): : 451 - 477