Partner Phubbing and Relationship Satisfaction among High and Low Reward Romantic Partners: An Expectancy Violations Theory Perspective

被引:3
|
作者
Roberts, James A. [1 ,2 ]
David, Meredith E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Waco, TX USA
[2] Baylor Univ, One Bear Pl 98007, Waco, TX 76798 USA
关键词
Partner phubbing; Expectancy Violation Theory; relationship satisfaction; partner reward value; CONVERSATION; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1080/10447318.2023.2238341
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Partner phubbing (phone snubbing) is the perceived extent to which an individual uses or is distracted by his or her cellphone while in the company of his/her relationship partner. The present research examines the impact of partner phubbing on relationship satisfaction through an Expectancy Violations Theory perspective. Across two studies, including a survey of 180 adults currently in a romantic relationship, and an experiment of 141 married adults, results reveal that partner phubbing results in negative expectancy violations, which in turn lower relationship satisfaction. However, support is found for moderated mediation, such that the negative indirect effect of partner phubbing on relationship satisfaction depends on the phubber's level of partner reward value. When partner reward value is low, expectancy violations from partner phubbing have a strong negative effect on relationship satisfaction, but this effect is attenuated to non-significance when partner reward value is high.
引用
收藏
页码:5493 / 5502
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] An Actor-Partner Model of Partner Phubbing, Mobile Phone Conflict, and Relationship Satisfaction Between Romantic Partners in Liberia
    Togar, Euriahs M.
    Vanden Abeele, M. M. P.
    van Wijk, Carel H.
    Yasin, Raja Mehtab
    Antheunis, Marjolijn L.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2023, 40 (10) : 3147 - 3170
  • [2] My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners
    Roberts, James A.
    David, Meredith E.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 54 : 134 - 141
  • [3] The Relationship Between Partner Phubbing and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Relationship Satisfaction and Perceived Romantic Relationship Quality
    Yam, Faruk Caner
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2023, 126 (01) : 303 - 331
  • [4] Partner Facebook Intrusion, Jealousy Over Facebook Use, and Relationship Satisfaction Among Romantic Partners
    Gonzalez-Rivera, Juan Anibal
    Aquino-Serrano, Francisco
    Mendez-Cortes, Tomas J.
    Rivera-Viruet, Jonathan
    COUPLE AND FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 11 (03) : 254 - 262
  • [5] Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction through the lens of social allergy theory
    Roberts, James A.
    David, Meredith E.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2022, 195
  • [6] Investigating the impact of partner phubbing on romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction: The moderating role of attachment anxiety
    David, Meredith E.
    Roberts, James A.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2021, 38 (12) : 3590 - 3609
  • [7] Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length
    Wang, Xingchao
    Xie, Xiaochun
    Wang, Yuhui
    Wang, Pengcheng
    Lei, Li
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 110 : 12 - 17
  • [8] Emotion Regulation and Romantic Partners' Relationship Satisfaction: Self-Reports and Partner Reports
    Kardum, Igor
    Gracanin, Asmir
    Hudek-Knezevic, Jasna
    Blazic, Barbara
    PSIHOLOGIJSKE TEME, 2021, 30 (01): : 145 - 159
  • [9] Disclosure of Sexual Trauma to Romantic Partners: Examining PTSD Clusters, Partner Reactions, Perceived Partner Responsiveness, and Relationship Satisfaction
    Hinnenkamp, Lynsey
    Owens, Gina P.
    VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2024,
  • [10] The Compatibility of Ideal and Real Romantic Partner Characteristics, Attachment to Partner and Relationship Satisfaction Among Indian Women
    Aiste Gerdvilyte
    Shobhana C. Abhyankar
    Psychological Studies, 2010, 55 (3) : 188 - 194