Assessing and transferring social value of ecosystem services in wetland parks based on SolVES model

被引:8
|
作者
Guan, Dongjie [1 ]
Ran, Buwen [2 ]
Zhou, Lilei [1 ,3 ]
Jin, Chaojun [2 ]
Yu, Xiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Smart City, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Smart City, 66 Xuefu Rd, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Wetland parks; SolVES model; Visitor perception; Social value; Cultural ecosystem services; URBAN GREEN SPACES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111300
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Wetland parks have become important components of urban landscapes. Assessing and transferring the social value of wetland ecosystem services is important for enhancing human well-being. In this study, we selected Caiyunhu National Wetland Park (CNWP) in Chongqing, China, Huanhuaxi Wetland Park (HWP) in Chengdu, Sichuan, China and Wusongpaotaiwan National Wetland Park (WNWP) in Shanghai, China for study. The Social Value for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) model is constructed from a survey to quantitatively evaluate the social value of CNWP. Then, the social value transfer model is used to predict the social values at WNWP and HWP. This study discovered the followings: (1) when there are abundant environmental factors, aesthetic value and recreation value have higher performance, and policy sites with greater socioeconomic matching benefit more from the transfer model. (2) Water bodies and bridges have a high impact on social value in Chinese-style wetland parks, often generating higher social value near the water. (3) In the future construction of wetland parks, more attention should be given to the combination of water, bridges and roads, which can improve the cultural services of wetland parks. The value transfer model has a positive impact on the evaluation of the social value of wetland parks, and improving its utilization can play a guiding role in future wetland park planning and renovation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating and transferring social value of ecosystem services in urban wetland parks using the SolVES model
    Chen, Bingyan
    Lu, Yao
    Imran, Muhammad
    Adam, Nawal Abdalla
    Jang, Jin
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2025, 172
  • [2] Social Value Evaluation of Ecosystem Services in Global Geoparks Based on SolVES Model
    Zhu, Yiting
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [3] Assessing Social Values for Ecosystem Services in Rural Areas Based on the SolVES Model: A Case Study from Nanjing, China
    Duan, Haoran
    Xu, Ning
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (11):
  • [4] Inequality and ecosystem services: The value and social distribution of Niger Delta wetland services
    Adekola, Olalekan
    Mitchell, Gordon
    Grainger, Alan
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 12 : 42 - 54
  • [5] Understanding the dynamic changes in wetland cultural ecosystem services: Integrating annual social media data into the SolVES
    Huang, Sitong
    Tian, Tian
    Zhai, Lingge
    Deng, Lingzhi
    Che, Yue
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 156
  • [6] Net Value of Wetland Ecosystem Services in China
    Cao, Shixiong
    Zhang, Junze
    Su, Wei
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2018, 6 (10): : 1433 - 1441
  • [7] Assessment of ecosystem services value in Linghekou wetland based on landscape change
    Cheng, Qian
    Zhou, Linfei
    Wang, Tieliang
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2022, 15
  • [8] A simple method for assessing the vulnerability of wetland ecosystem services
    Stratford, Charlie J.
    Acreman, Mike C.
    Rees, H. Gwyn
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2011, 56 (08): : 1485 - 1500
  • [9] Ecosystem services value of wetland in Suzhou Taihu Lake
    GU Li-xia 1
    Ecological Economy, 2010, 6 (04) : 349 - 355
  • [10] Perceptions of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Urban Parks Based on Social Network Data
    Dai, Peichao
    Zhang, Shaoliang
    Chen, Zanxu
    Gong, Yunlong
    Hou, Huping
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)